As the US exits Afghanistan, China makes its move

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
As US and NATO forces gradual withdraw troops from Afghanistan, China has turned it up a notch. On Oct. 31, Afghan president Ashraf Ghani went to Beijing for the China-hosted Istanbul Process, a plan to integrate Russia and Central Asia, in the process benefiting Afghanistan's economy, security and stability.

After the meeting, the US Department of State broke its usual stance and issued a statement welcoming China and other countries to participate in Afghanistan's reconstruction and development.

China has three strategic goals in Afghanistan: first, to utilize raw materials and resources; second, to promote joint business opportunities, including infrastructure projects such as railways, roads and telecom; and third, to prevent Afghanistan from becoming a base for Xinjiang separatists including the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM).

During the 13 years of US troop presence in the country, Chinese enterprises have utilized the relative security to foray into Afghanistan's raw material and energy sectors. Once the US withdraws its forces, Chinese enterprises will face a changing security environment and a question mark on the future of operations.

China's response to this changing environment is threefold: first, it is seeking support from Pakistan to jointly crack down on Xinjiang separatist forces in Afghanistan. Second, Beijing plans to establish a dialogue channel and negotiation mechanism with the Taliban, hoping to protect Chinese enterprises in the Taliban's sphere of influence and even working with the Taliban in its campaign against ETIM. Third, China will include Afghanistan in its current six-party Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) security framework, which would heighten security measures in the to jointly raise China's security interest in Afghanistan.

After 13 years of war and US presence, Afghanistan would likely be receptive to the entry of other major powers in providing economic opportunities to develop its economy.

China is simultaneously developing relations with Afghanistan's new government and the Taliban, in a bid to develop energy resources and conduct an anti-terror campaign. The Islamic State has threatened to launch attacks in Xinjiang and even occupy the autonomous region, which has Beijing on the offensive.

Beijing lacks experience in communicating with Afghanistan's tribes and is proceeding with caution so as not to repeat the mistakes of the Soviet Union and the US barging into the Middle Eastern country.

(Tseng Fu-sheng is a national security adviser to the National Policy Foundation. Translated by Want China Times.)


As the US exits Afghanistan, China makes its move|Op-Ed Contributors|Opinion|WantChinaTimes.com
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
No that is actually bad to know if you look at the ultra high speed train plans between Moscow and Beijing. The 1st link east from Moscow was supposed to be built by France but they ****ed that up in the ship (not) deal so it is in-house. China does the long run so as fast as they can track it is the delivery date. This might change the cargo for both routes. The short 'to Moscow' run would be the supply run from the ammo supply places aka Headquarters, striking that deep would take a bit more than a re-fuel.

Of course Moscow would have a few words like, 'At least this time you let us know what was coming'

 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
No that is actually bad to know if you look at the ultra high speed train plans between Moscow and Beijing. The 1st link east from Moscow was supposed to be built by France but they ****ed that up in the ship (not) deal so it is in-house. China does the long run so as fast as they can track it is the delivery date. This might change the cargo for both routes. The short 'to Moscow' run would be the supply run from the ammo supply places aka Headquarters, striking that deep would take a bit more than a re-fuel.

The result of the information may be bad. But it's still good to know the information.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
When is somebody going to ship NG by boat like promised, I got that 1 penny stock share that is supposed to soar
I assume that is the same route as any new pipeline would take. How about mag lev (self powered) train with a variety of cargo, oil being just one such product. doing ore by that route would make for some expensive products. If Russia has the ore and the fire then a finer product is still only a step or two that leads to a final product that will make it a two way line.

You will notice that in Canada it was the West that had the oil and gas and food and it was the East that had none and they had all sorts of devices that came into play that got their fingers in the pot for nothing, or at least a hidden greatly reduced price. Now it is Ukraine and the East has the oil and the gas and the food and it is the West that is looking for devices but the doors are not opening, period, time isn't going to change that, it will reinforce it thought, not a result we want to see happen.

In the meantime some newer CP Rail leveling crews would be able to cut down the 7 day time (didn't write it down) and the US had plans to aid cornerning so it was full throttle all the way. If it was load shifting to the inside the perhaps the cargo cars can do the same, let their wheels build up a pressure reserve and optic fiber the rest to a central control. It takes me 7 days to get things from the east and it it lot closer than their rail line.

If they aren't bringing arms in then this is a good Russia thread, oops, forgot they can do no good. lol the more things never change the more they stay the same. author unknown for obvious reasons.
 
Last edited: