Denmark’s Obsequious Treatment of Returning ISIS Fighters

[Locutus]

ob·se·qui·ous

adjective \əb-ˈsē-kwē-əs, äb-\ : too socially squeamish and sensitive to do the right thing; eager to help or obey someone important where self-congratulations are in order; feeble minded; politically correct to a sickening degree.


Denmark tries a soft-handed approach to returned Islamist fighters




Moonbat Euroweenies are once again trying a “soft-handed approach” to Islam. The Islamic State hasn’t finished filling the power vacuum Obama created by prematurely withdrawing US forces from Iraq, but already homegrown Islamists from welfare-financed immigrant communities are returning from the battlefields more radicalized than ever and possessing new skills that can be applied to terrorism. You would think they would be prevented from reentering European countries, or locked up for treason. But in Denmark, #1 European producer of ISIS fighters per capita,

not one returned fighter has been locked up. Instead, taking the view that discrimination at home is as criminal as Islamic State recruiting, officials here are providing free psychological counseling while finding returnees jobs and spots in schools and universities. Officials credit a new effort to reach out to a radical mosque with stanching the flow of recruits.
​

If the flow is diminishing, it is probably because those who want to go fight for ISIS have already done it by now, not because liberals are bending extra low to nuzzle Muslims’ hindquarters.

Some progressives say Aarhus should become a model for other communities in the United States and Europe that are trying to cope with the question of what to do when the jihad generation comes back to town.


Here’s an alternative answer to the question:

Obama’s coalition against ISIS is mostly a sham, but Denmark has joined it, technically putting it on the side of Western Civilization. Even if they are the offspring of Muslim immigrants, Danish citizens have committed treason if they fight for the Islamic State. Granting them special jobs and university slots isn’t just foolish and wrong; it is insane.

Where Islam finds weakness, it will expand. Danes are advised to learn to like the sound of bombs going off in crowded public places.

Denmark rewards participants.


Moonbattery » Denmark’s Obsequious Treatment of Returning ISIS Fighters

ob·se·qui·ous
​

 

[spaminator]

obsequious you are not the father.

 

[Blackleaf]

Moonbat Euroweenies are once again trying a “soft-handed approach” to Islam.

So Denmark, which has a population of just over 5 million, represents a whole continent of 743 million people, constituting 11% of the world's population and many vastly different cultures in 50 different countries?

As for the term "Euroweenies", you are applying it to a country which fought remarkably bravely in the War in Afghanistan. Denmark has lost 43 troops in the conflict, whereas Canada (whose population is seven to eight times that of Denmark) only lost 158, a much smaller proportion of your population than Denmark. The European countries which are taking part in the conflict against ISIS will also last a lot longer in the conflict than Canada, which is bailing out after six months whether they've had any effect on ISIS or not.

You also have to remember that it's actually Canada which is seen around the world as being liberal and soft and having a "soft-handed approach" to things.

You would think they would be prevented from reentering European countries, or locked up for treason.

What Denmark does is what Denmark does. There are fifty countries in Europe, each with their own laws. Just because Denmark is not preventing ISIS terrorists from returning to Denmark doesn't mean that all fifty European countries, from Ireland to Moldova and from Norway, San Marino, France and Belgium to Lithuania and Slovenia, will each do the same. That's like saying that if Jamaica does one thing then the whole of North America will also do it.

 

[Locutus]

daft: definition of daft in Oxford dictionary (British & World English)

So Denmark, which has a population of just over 5 million, represents a whole continent of 743 million people, constituting 11% of the world's population and many vastly different cultures in 50 different countries?

As for the term "Euroweenies", you are applying it to a country which fought remarkably bravely in the War in Afghanistan. Denmark has lost 43 troops in the conflict, whereas Canada (whose population is seven to eight times that of Denmark) only lost 158, a much smaller proportion of your population than Denmark. The European countries which are taking part in the conflict against ISIS will also last a lot longer in the conflict than Canada, which is bailing out after six months whether they've had any effect on ISIS or not.

You also have to remember that it's actually Canada which is seen around the world as being liberal and soft and having a "soft-handed approach" to things.



What Denmark does is what Denmark does. There are fifty countries in Europe, each with their own laws. Just because Denmark is not preventing ISIS terrorists from returning to Denmark doesn't mean that all fifty European countries, from Ireland to Moldova and from Norway, San Marino, France and Belgium to Lithuania and Slovenia, will each do the same. That's like saying that if Jamaica does one thing then the whole of North America will also do it.

 

[captain morgan]

So Denmark, which has a population of just over 5 million, represents a whole continent of 743 million people, constituting 11% of the world's population and many vastly different cultures in 50 different countries?

As for the term "Euroweenies", you are applying it to a country which fought remarkably bravely in the War in Afghanistan. Denmark has lost 43 troops in the conflict, whereas Canada (whose population is seven to eight times that of Denmark) only lost 158, a much smaller proportion of your population than Denmark. The European countries which are taking part in the conflict against ISIS will also last a lot longer in the conflict than Canada, which is bailing out after six months whether they've had any effect on ISIS or not.

You also have to remember that it's actually Canada which is seen around the world as being liberal and soft and having a "soft-handed approach" to things.



What Denmark does is what Denmark does. There are fifty countries in Europe, each with their own laws. Just because Denmark is not preventing ISIS terrorists from returning to Denmark doesn't mean that all fifty European countries, from Ireland to Moldova and from Norway, San Marino, France and Belgium to Lithuania and Slovenia, will each do the same. That's like saying that if Jamaica does one thing then the whole of North America will also do it.

Liberal Bleeding Heart Euroweenies

That a better fit BL?

 

[WLDB]

As for the term "Euroweenies", you are applying it to a country which fought remarkably bravely in the War in Afghanistan. Denmark has lost 43 troops in the conflict, whereas Canada (whose population is seven to eight times that of Denmark) only lost 158, a much smaller proportion of your population than Denmark.

So we were better at not getting our folks killed. Perhaps the Europeans could learn something from ours.

 

[Nuggler]

Beware Danes; the a s s you kiss may be your own.8O

 

[Sal]

So we were better at not getting our folks killed. Perhaps the Europeans could learn something from ours.

first thought that went through my head...we are the toughest of the tough

Beware Danes; the a s s you kiss may be your own.8O

and might not even have to bend over

 

[taxslave]

The Danes don't have to ever worry about learning what bombs going off sounds like. They will just roll over, play dead and adhere to Sharia Law when it is imposed on them.

 

[petros]

The Danes don't have to ever worry about learning what bombs going off sounds like. They will just roll over, play dead and adhere to Sharia Law when it is imposed on them.

Qanun. Ever heard of it?

 

[Blackleaf]

Liberal Bleeding Heart Euroweenies

That a better fit BL?

A Canadian calling people "liberal bleeding hearts" is like a German calling people humourless or a Chinaman saying that someone looks sinister and regimented. It's like a Yank calling someone fat, loud, boisterous and arrogant.

 

[lone wolf]

A Brit calling out other people on faults is just plain hypocrisy and characteristic of the breed

 

[Blackleaf]

So we were better at not getting our folks killed. Perhaps the Europeans could learn something from ours.

Well, you lost more people per head of population than the French and Germans did, and they're useless in war nowadays.

The fact is that Europeans like the Danes, Dutch, Estonians and British were still taking the fight to the Taliban long after the Canadians bailed out, and several European countries will be in the conflict against ISIS for far longer than Canada, which is sending a few shi*ty CF-18 Hornets (some of which will crash without ISIS even doing anything to them), and then bravely bailing out after just six months.

The Danes don't have to ever worry about learning what bombs going off sounds like. They will just roll over, play dead and adhere to Sharia Law when it is imposed on them.

That's the same Denmark whose newspaper Jyllands-Posten published several anti-Mohammed cartoons in September 2005, whereas every Canadian newspaper bar one refused to post them for fear of causing "offence".

 

[Goober]

Well, you lost more people per head of population than the French and Germans did, and they're useless in war nowadays.

The fact is that Europeans like the Danes, Dutch, Estonians and British were still taking the fight to the Taliban long after the Canadians bailed out, and several European countries will be in the conflict against ISIS for far longer than Canada, which is sending a few shi*ty CF-18 Hornets (some of which will crash without ISIS even doing anything to them), and then bravely bailing out after just six months.




That's the same Denmark whose newspaper Jyllands-Posten published several anti-Mohammed cartoons in September 2005, whereas every Canadian newspaper bar one refused to post them for fear of causing "offence".

Just because you are thicker than fuk, look to the Area of Operations.
Kandahar was the center point, ya thick fuk.
Then the audacity of using numbers for soldiers killed as an excuse to slam another countries soldiers who also served and died again shows what a disgusting puke you are.

 

[captain morgan]

A Brit calling out other people on faults is just plain hypocrisy and characteristic of the breed

Perhaps what you really meant was 'inbred' as in characteristic of onbreeding

Well, you lost more people per head of population than the French and Germans did, and they're useless in war nowadays.

Your list of uselessness is incomplete.. Britain is missing.

By the by; the Canadians and Americans suffered losses associated with actual fighting and exposure to combat.... It's an unfortunate byproduct of saving the UK from utter domination over and over and over

 

[Blackleaf]

Just because you are thicker than fuk, look to the Area of Operations.
Kandahar was the center point, ya thick fuk.

In Helmand Province, Danish troops are involved in the worst fighting their armed forces have undertaken since the Second Schleswig War of 1864. A recent survey has determined that Denmark by far has the highest count of casualties relative to population of any ISAF member.

Then the audacity of using numbers for soldiers killed as an excuse to slam another countries soldiers who also served and died again shows what a disgusting puke you are.

Remember, I didn't start this. It was a Canadian who started having ago at the supposed "Euroweenies". I've got every right to stick up for my fellow Europeans and point out that many of these supposed "Euroweenies", even little Denmark and Estonia, performed more valiantly against the Taliban in Afghanistan than Canada did. So stop trying to make excuses for the fact that plucky little Denmark lost more troops per head of population than Canada, which quickly bailed out way back in 2011 once the going got tough.

 

[damngrumpy]

NATO or any other alliance nation who has troops or planes or other personnel in service
against ISIS must consider itself in a state of war which means anyone who goes to war
and comes home after fighting on the side of the enemy is a TRAITOR and should be
subject to the full extent of the law against Traitors in their home country NO EXCEPTIONS
we are putting allied service people in harms way on behalf of the allied nation states
We owe it to them to punish the enemies in our midst. We owe it to fellow citizens as well
In addition we must punish all those who conspire to assist them or give them aid and
comfort
Its time to ferret out those who are an obstruction to our democracy regardless of where
they came from or whether they are home grown.

 

[Blackleaf]

By the by; the Canadians and Americans suffered losses associated with actual fighting and exposure to combat.... It's an unfortunate byproduct of saving the UK from utter domination over and over and over

I've been looking at the figures and doing some maths. Here are four countries and, out of the total number of troops they have lost, the percentage which were killed through combat and hostile action rather than just through illness, accident and non-combat injuries.

The results are rather interesting:

Britain: 89%
Denmark: 86%
Canada: 83%
US: 82%

 

[gerryh]

Denmark should now be considered a nation that is supporting terrorism and treated as such. They are aiding the enemy.

 

[captain morgan]

I've been looking at the figures and doing some maths.

Been doing some maths, have ya?.. Is that the course of study right after englishes?

The results are rather interesting:

Britain: 89%
Denmark: 86%
Canada: 83%
US: 82%

Pretty horrific numbers for those nations that fought England's battles for her.

Your welcome, by the way