Merkel’s visit heightens contrast with PM on science

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Merkel’s visit to climate scientists heightens contrast with PM on environment policy

Angela Merkel will make a special visit to Halifax this week to highlight the work of climate scientists, a stop that underscores the German Chancellor’s focus on science and the environment in a summer when those same issues are dogging Canada’s Prime Minister.

After two days in the national capital region for meetings with Stephen Harper, Ms. Merkel will visit Dalhousie University in Halifax Thursday on her way home.

She’ll attend the launch of a joint project between the university’s Halifax Marine Research Institute and German scientists from the Helmholtz Association called “Change, Risks and Resources in the Oceans: A Transatlantic and Arctic Approach.”

The exhibits she’ll tour will highlight how rising ocean temperatures are causing plankton levels to decline and hurting fish populations. They’ll also demonstrate the impact of extreme marine events such as hurricanes and oil spills.

The extra stop wasn’t Ottawa’s idea.

German officials insist the Chancellor – a former quantum chemistry researcher – is not trying to provoke Ottawa with the visit. Yet it does drive home the difference in priorities for the two leaders. Ms. Merkel’s summer included a speech to an international climate conference in Berlin stressing the need to achieve a new global climate pact this year. Meanwhile in Canada, the Conservative government has been under fire for months over spending cuts to the environment and its efforts to further develop Alberta’s oil sands through new pipelines.

Canadian scientists organized a protest on Parliament Hill last month accusing the federal government of an “attack on science,” pointing to cuts such as the shutting down of Canada’s northernmost research laboratory in Eureka, Nunavut and the termination of the National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy.

Martha Crago, Dalhousie’s vice-president of research who helped organize the Halifax visit, said the joint research will examine the opportunities for resource extraction as the Arctic melts, as well as the environmental consequences.

She noted that the project will be partially funded through new federal research funds announced earlier this year, including a $25-million, five-year fund called Marine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response.

“I think that this is something that will help to keep informing Canadians and Canadian politicians,” Dr. Crago said. “Her interest in speaking with and being with the scientists is very profound. It’s really quite striking for us in a university because as many official-type events that we would try to plan, the word would come back: She wants to spend the time with the scientists.”

Gary Goodyear, the federal minister of state for science and technology, will attend Thursday’s event. His office confirmed that it was organized by Dalhousie and the German government.

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May said she hopes Ms. Merkel will convince Mr. Harper to change his approach to the environment and climate change.

“This visit should send a signal to Stephen Harper that the rest of the world needs to see Canada stop playing the role of obstructive, unwilling partner in climate negotiations and start being helpful,” she said.

Georg Juergens, the deputy head of mission at the German embassy in Ottawa, said the aim of the visit is to highlight the importance of science as a driver of future growth.

“We always like to include a talk with students or have an event at a university when we do visits like these, because if you talk one leader to another that’s all very fine, but you have to have an impact as well,” he said.


“Universities are our futures. Canada and Germany are both knowledge societies. We are a relatively small amount of people and we need to have an above average amount of brains.”


Merkel
 
Last edited:

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
It's not just science that the Germans are better at..

Why Germany shuns Canada’s debt model

Angela Merkel may be thinking about the Canadian example right now, and not in a good way.The German Chancellor will be in Canada on Wednesday and Thursday for talks with Prime Minister Stephen Harper about a proposed Canada-European Union free trade agreement. They will also, of course, discuss the state of things in Europe. That is where the unhappy Canadian precedent comes in.

Many observers expect the chronic European debt crisis to become acute this fall. Push could come to shoved-out-of-the-euro for Greece. Spain and Portugal are also increasingly insolvent. Ireland continues to struggle, and Italy can’t meet its deficit-reduction targets because of a worsening recession.

To prevent a possible collapse of the euro zone, a growing number of European economists and politicians are calling for the mutualization of debt. In essence, at least some of the debt of the nations in the euro zone would be pooled, with the richer countries guaranteeing the loans and helping to pay them down.

Ms. Merkel is strongly resisting the idea, and with good reason. Germany and other northern European “have” states could end up bleeding money year after year to “have not” states in southern Europe. The euro zone could become, in effect, a mirror image of Canadian federalism, with the Mediterranean playing the role of Quebec and the Maritimes.

The various rescue packages that have been put together to solve the crisis, however ineffective they might be, at least come with conditions. In exchange for loans and guarantees, indebted governments are expected to balance their budgets by cutting social programs, laying off public-sector workers, and loosening regulations in order to encourage private enterprise.

By mutualizing debt, the conditions attached to the loans could be weakened or disappear. Countries such as Germany that keep their entitlements in line with tax revenues would annually subsidize governments that spend money on things they can’t afford.

Much the same thing happens in Canada. It’s called equalization. The federal government sends transfers to poorer provincial governments, which spend the money on social programs that would otherwise be beyond their means. Some of those programs – such as Quebec’s daycare and tuition subsidies – are more generous than programs in provinces that don’t qualify for transfers. This is exactly what German taxpayers are warning Ms. Merkel they won’t put up with.

And once debt is pooled, entitlements become pooled as well. Everyone in the euro zone would come to expect certain basic levels of heath care, education and other social services, whether or not they could pay for them, just as Canada’s Constitution guarantees a similar basic level of services across the country.

The Economist warns of exactly such a danger in this week’s issue. “A transfer union across the existing single currency zone based on the Canadian model would seek to make governments’ revenues more equal,” its writers predict. They estimate such a system would cost Germany the equivalent of 3 per cent of GDP annually.

Sounds about right. Ontario loses an estimated 2 per cent of its GDP each year in transfers to other provinces, according to a recent Ontario government report, while Alberta pays considerably more.

But no one has the power to compel have-not provinces to balance their budgets and trim their spending or face a cut-off in transfers. Only the governments themselves and the bond-rating agencies that assess their lending risk have any real say.

Quebec’s debt currently sits at about 55 per cent of the province’s gross domestic product. If Parti Québécois Leader Pauline Marois had her way and Quebec became an independent nation, assuming along the way its share of the national debt, the new country would start life with a debt-to-GDP ratio of just under 100 per cent, instantly making it one of the world’s most indebted countries.

No wonder Ms. Merkel shuns the notion of mutualization of debt. It’s too reminiscent of one Canadian example other countries might wish to avoid.

Why Germany shuns Canada
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
the German Chancellor’s focus on science and the environment
uhh.. i think we could better describe that as a focus on superstition and capitulations to fear mongering.

And she's here to talk about Free Trade, as Europe totters on the edge of economic collapse.. brought to the brink by laissez-fair Free Market capitalism. The further they slip into that quagmire the more they propose that which created the crisis as its solution. They are quite mad.

There is actually a diseased and common root to AGW and Free Markets... most notably in Carbon Credits.. but deeper in its predatory, avaricious and cynical view of humanity.

I wouldn't consider her a very credible and wise voice.. in fact.. i'd say she's a bit of a waste of time.. she should go back to cackling around her own cauldron.
 
Last edited:

beaker

Electoral Member
Jun 11, 2012
508
0
16
thepeacecountry
Re: Merkel’s visit heightens contrast with PM on science

There is actually a diseased and common root to AGW and Free Markets... most notably in Carbon Credits.. but deeper in its predatory, avaricious and cynical view of humanity.

:):):):) Carbon credits are the root of anthropogenic global warming.... Really, I hope you can explain that for me.
I hope the press release isn't being overly optimisitc about the Chancellors reason for being at Dalhousie.. The line by the German diplomat was great, You can have the leaders talk to each other but you also have to have results. paraphrased. Funny
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
:):):):) Carbon credits are the root of anthropogenic global warming.... Really, I hope you can explain that for me.
I hope the press release isn't being overly optimisitc about the Chancellors reason for being at Dalhousie.. The line by the German diplomat was great, You can have the leaders talk to each other but you also have to have results. paraphrased. Funny


Read the post carefully breaker.. the expression was that Free Markets and AGW have the same root. The root is a predatory, avaricious and cynical view of humanity.

Carbon Credits are the payoff, the fruit, for the Global Investment Organism.. by way of the immense control over and profit from the world economy they can elicit.. through the Con Job... the hoax of AGW.. which doesn't exist at all.
 
Last edited:

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,466
138
63
Location, Location
Read the post carefully breaker.. the expression was that Free Markets and Carbon Credits have the same root. Carbon Credits are the payoff, for the Global Investment Organism.. by way of the immense control over and profit from the world economy... of the Con Job... the hoax of AGW.. which doesn't exist at all.

You're proud to be part of the 2%, I guess.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Merkel’s visit gives Harper chance to hash out EU deal

With the clock ticking down on Stephen Harper’s self-imposed deadline to strike a wide-ranging free-trade deal with the European Union, this week’s visit by German Chancellor Angela Merkel is shaping up as a key chance for the two leaders to work out the final problems.

Over dinner Wednesday at the Prime Minister’s Harrington Lake cottage, followed by a morning meeting and lunch in Parliament’s Centre Block, Canada will be looking for Germany to use its considerable influence within the EU to bring these talks to a close.

The Conservative government promised to complete negotiations by the end of 2012 and in spite of the numerous distractions created by the ongoing European debt crisis, both sides insist the talks are on track.

Mr. Harper and Ms. Merkel – who faces growing internal dissent at home over her approach to the European economy – agree that more trade and fewer regulations for business are the best and only way out of the crisis.

Yet nine formal rounds of negotiations have failed to produce final language around intellectual property rights, pharmaceutical patent rules and specific details on import quota changes for products like meat and cheese. The talks are now at the stage where political leaders – rather than appointed officials – will have to resolve the remaining obstacles. Two more “focused sessions” among officials are scheduled to bring the deal to a close.

Many of the areas under negotiation cover provincial files, such as access to government procurement contracts, yet Mr. Harper insists Ottawa has kept the provinces on board.

“I think it’s fair to say that thus far, we’ve had unprecedented cooperation between the provinces and the federal government,” Mr. Harper told reporters Monday in Toronto. “And I think it’s important that both Canada and the European Union drive these negotiations to conclusion. But obviously as you know, nothing’s settled until everything’s settled.”

A mood of optimism dominated financial markets during the London Olympics. But that was fading Monday, with stocks falling in 14 of 18 European markets after several weeks of gains.

George Juergens, the deputy head of mission at the German Embassy in Ottawa, says Canada and Germany are on the same page when it comes to the economy.

“We have now both reached the point where you need to find innovation in order to jumpstart the markets, be it in more creative ways of deregulating labour markets, of deregulating export markets or deregulating industry growth,” he said in an interview. “It’s always very nice if you have enough cash to spend it to start the economy. Right now we don’t. And we need to do it differently. Maybe thinking about it together will come up with a creative idea.”

Europe’s debt crisis is entering a dangerous new phase as Ms. Merkel makes her first bilateral visit to Canada.

The German Chancellor is under mounting pressure at home to take a much harder line against Greece and other ailing euro zone countries – both from within her own government and possibly from the German courts. That could make it harder to keep the 17-member euro zone from splintering apart.

A top member of Ms. Merkel’s Christian Democrats warned Monday that Germany would veto next month’s scheduled payment to Greece if the country isn’t living up to the austerity conditions of its €130-billion bailout package.

“Even if the glass is half full, that won’t be sufficient for a new aid package. Germany cannot and will not agree to that,” Michael Fuchs, the party’s deputy parliamentary leader, told German newspaper Handelsblatt.

“A policy of the last, last, last chance won’t work any more and must come to an end.”

The European Commission, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund are due to decide on the next instalment of the bailout next month. The ECB is also looking at a much more extensive plan to buy the embattled sovereign bonds of other indebted countries, Italy and Spain among them.

Ms. Merkel is awaiting a decision, also in September, from Germany’s top court that could put at risk the creation a permanent European bailout fund – a key part of a firewall to keep the debt crisis from spreading to Italy and Spain. Several lawsuits are challenging the legality of Germany’s contributions to the fund, without input from German voters or the German Parliament.

“There will be a lot to do,” Steffen Seibert, Ms. Merkel’s chief spokesman, acknowledged to reporters in Berlin as Ms. Merkel returned from vacation.

Merkel
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
70
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
I imagine that he does it very carefully. Gravity is science and he could not help being skeptical of that.


There are categories of science.

Gravity is a Scientific LAW, undisputed and self evident.

Relativity is a theory of science, supported by predictive evidence.. although without the weight to make it a law.

AGW is a PSEUDO science.. essentially pure hocus-pocus without any scientific credibility or merit.

So i deal with gravity quite well.. but i don't subscribe to pseudo sciences.. as they produce no demonstrable value.
 

Cabbagesandking

Council Member
Apr 24, 2012
1,041
0
36
Ontario
There are categories of science.

Gravity is a Scientific LAW, undisputed and self evident.

Relativity is a theory of science, supported by predictive evidence.. although without the weight to make it a law.

AGW is a PSEUDO science.. essentially pure hocus-pocus without any scientific credibility or merit.

So i deal with gravity quite well.. but i don't subscribe to pseudo sciences.. as they produce no demonstrable value.


AGW is a product of a immutable Law of Physics. Greenhouse gases control the Earth's temperature regime. The Sun provides the energy. GHG's decide what becomes of it.
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
AGW is a product of a immutable Law of Physics. Greenhouse gases control the Earth's temperature regime. The Sun provides the energy. GHG's decide what becomes of it.

that's the patter.. where's the proof.. specifically with CARBON, the unavoidable fuel and byproduct of an industrial society. They've put the cart before the horse.. ditched the scientific method in that regard.. even if the implausible nonsense of the theory were found to have any credibility.. which it won't. That was never the intent, no one's even really looking for anything but selective anecdotes of 'hot weather' to prop it up.

Carbon was CHOSEN because it is the essential element in propelling humane industrial development and feeding its people. It will be for centuries to come. It won't be replaced wind or sunshine or any other of that feel - good fluff. To support the human population even at current levels we need carbon.

And man's contribution to the suspended carbon in earth, air and sea ???? .. all in some form of continual rotation.. about 6 thousand metric tons.. of 44,000 metric tons total.. for an element that represent 4 parts for every 10,000 in the atmosphere. You do the math.

One has to look for ulterior motives for this.. for some underlying philosophical imperative.. deeply antipathetic to the human cause.
 
Last edited:

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Relativity is a theory of science, supported by predictive evidence.. although without the weight to make it a law.

You're clearly misinformed. More weight doesn't make something a scientific law. Scientific laws are simple. They can be distilled into neat mathematical equations, though they do not describe the causal mechanism. Theories on the other hand deal with more dynamic relationships, and do describe the causal mechanism, and much like scientific laws, the weight they carry comes not from the fact that they are laws or theories, but from the repeated findings, predictive power, and vast body of evidence that supports them.

AGW is a PSEUDO science.. essentially pure hocus-pocus without any scientific credibility or merit.
Really? It's easily provable that carbon dioxide absorbs infra-red radiation, and the carbon dioxide molecule once excited by absorbing the energy will vibrate, rotate, and give off heat to return to the rest state. That heat is radiated back towards the ground, to other molecules in the atmosphere, in all directions, and more heat is retained by the planet. As it is for other greenhouse gases. It's easily provable that human activities have increased the amount of greenhouse gases. And as a corollary, scientific laws like thermodynamics state that a body which gains heat will increase in temperature.