Government Size and Growth: A Survey and Interpretation of the Evidence

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
[FONT=Myriad Roman, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-serif;]Abstract: [/FONT]

[FONT=Myriad Roman, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-serif;] The literature on the relationship between the size of government and economic growth is full of seemingly contradictory findings. This conflict is largely explained by variations in definitions and the countries studied. An alternative approach - of limiting the focus to studies of the relationship in rich countries, measuring government size as total taxes or total expenditure relative to GDP and relying on panel data estimations with variation over time - reveals a more consistent picture. The most recent studies find a significant negative correlation: An increase in government size by 10 percentage points is associated with a 0.5 to 1 percent lower annual growth rate. We discuss efforts to make sense of this correlation, and note several pitfalls involved in giving it a causal interpretation. Against this background, we discuss two explanations of why several countries with high taxes seem able to enjoy above average growth: (i) that countries with higher social trust levels are able to develop larger government sectors without harming the economy, and (ii) that countries with large governments compensate for high taxes

paper here:

Government Size and Growth: A Survey and Interpretation of the Evidence by Andreas Bergh, Magnus Henrekson :: SSRN

h/t sda


[/FONT]
 

Niflmir

A modern nomad
Dec 18, 2006
3,460
58
48
Leiden, the Netherlands
The literature on the relationship between the size of government and economic growth is full of seemingly contradictory findings.

Yet the paper only summarizes the results affirming their conclusion?

Either the authors are biased in favor of their conclusion or the literature is not so replete with contradictory findings and their paper was useless.