I had a friend who was bitching a while ago about the damage that 'urban sprawl' does to the environment. I nearly choked on my coffee. And since hearing this, I've realized it's a notion a lot of people have... that large urban centers are more hard on the environment than having everyone living on acreages.
ARGH!!!
Just because you can see all the people and factories, doesn't mean it's worse for the environment. Frankly, the kindest thing you can do is probably to live in a city. One road to lead to 50 people, instead of 50 roads to lead to them. Public transit, instead of having to drive long distances all the time. Plus, it's bad enough that cities eat into prime farm land, but acreages... each person eating up 5 acres of farm land instead of a city lot.
Taking an environmental problem (people), and spreading them out so that you can't see as much of the problem, makes no real ecological sense.
Okay, rant over.
ARGH!!!
Just because you can see all the people and factories, doesn't mean it's worse for the environment. Frankly, the kindest thing you can do is probably to live in a city. One road to lead to 50 people, instead of 50 roads to lead to them. Public transit, instead of having to drive long distances all the time. Plus, it's bad enough that cities eat into prime farm land, but acreages... each person eating up 5 acres of farm land instead of a city lot.
Taking an environmental problem (people), and spreading them out so that you can't see as much of the problem, makes no real ecological sense.
Okay, rant over.