Were Residential Schools Effective in Destroying First
Nations Culture in Canada
Nations Culture in Canada
That is the article I am writing for FNAT.
Also,I must add,your initial post about the effectiveness of destroying thier culture makes one wonder if you are being quite biased and trying to find "facts" to back up your presumption that the intent was to destroy culture raqther than educate about the world in which they live.
If the need for language is so important to thier culture,the elders and parents would teach thier young themselves,not leave it up to Ottawa.
The residential schools were an attempt to bring the natives into the society that surrounded them. It worked in some cases but not all. The culture of victimhood that is rampant throughout the native community today has magnified the abuses while minimizing the successes.Still today the natives resist "white man's" education,even though education is what is most needed.The schools did not wipe out thier languages,the parents who neglected to teach thier young did that.Languages die off because they outlive thier usefullness,for many reasons.Latin,ancient greek,and hundreds of tribal dialects the world over. If the need for language is so important to thier culture,the elders and parents would teach thier young themselves,not leave it up to Ottawa. Even in these" enlightened "times,parents on reserves who want thier children to succeed will send thier kids to off-reserve schools.
It's all chicken and egg. I should think native culture was doomed the moment Europeans set foot on North American soil. It was up to the early chiefs to organize resistance. Trade goods broke down resolve and the rest is history.
But at some point native peoples have to make the transition to the new reality- the modern economy. I haven't the least doubt residential schools came about as the government gave up trying to convince native elders of the importance of basics like an education and took the matter into its own hands. It failed miserably but what existed before the attempt was failure too.
Today the failure continues. First Nations desperately need leaders and role models who can lay it on the line: it's time to join the 21st century!
Exactly wallyj, did these schools destroy Native Culture? NO. Natives have been returning to their roots in spite of Residential Schools, their language, traditions, crafts, dancing all because the Elders are teaching them the old ways. They lost a decade but they are gaining speed on who and what it means to be a Native Canadian again.
Also,I must add,your initial post about the effectiveness of destroying thier culture makes one wonder if you are being quite biased and trying to find "facts" to back up your presumption that the intent was to destroy culture raqther than educate about the world in which they live.
And pray tell,who do you think pay for the Headstart programs? Do you think the James Bay Cree children will be able to cope in the modern world using Cree as thier main language or would they be better off using English? Don't be a boinopsy.
Researcher wrote: Lost a decade, what the f* are you talking about. Residential schools were from 1850 to 1996, that is not one decade. That to be exact is 146 of Residential school, which from your statement would go on the other side of the argument and state that Residential schools were not effective and they were able to keep their culture anyway and thought up ways to keep that culture going even during the height of residential school era.
Nasty nasty, sunshine I was refering to the time a single "Student" was at the school. I hope this isn't a term paper because you have already drawn conclusion that you can't prove. The fact that Native Culture still exist negates your childish rant. The Native Community is strong and vital, despite the wrongs that have been done to it.
Are you saying that if you are wrong,you will admit it but stick to your argument anyways? OMG,that is hilarious.And this is not a highschool or university paper this is to be published. So I can have whatever opinion I want. If the facts don't support my argument I will state it.
Well excuse me!! 25 million TAX dollars a year to design and implement a program to do what the parents should be doing at home in the first place. Well done,the "victims" have come up with another way to shirk thier responsibility and get paid for it. This is not a shining accomplishment but rather another example of failure. It may be a great program,but why is it needed? Someone is not doing thier job at HOME. Thanks for the butthead jibe,namecalling always follows a juvenile argument. As for the claim of residential schools existing from 1850 to 1996,please do some research.That is just not true.Why pray tell don't you do a google search and find out for yourself instead of being a butthead?
Funding vs design and implementation are not the same thing. As for James Bay, I'll wait and see what you find out, mmmmkay?
As for the claim of residential schools existing from 1850 to 1996,please do some research.That is just not true.
The origins of the residential school system predate Confederation and in part grew out of Canada's missionary experience with various religious organizations. The Federal Government began to play a role in the development and administration of this school system as early as 1874, mainly to meet its obligation, under the Indian Act, to provide an education to Aboriginal people, as well as to assist with their integration into the broader Canadian society.
The last federally run residential school in Canada closed in Saskatchewan in 1996