The government is on the attack of families in Canada who heat their homes with wood. The announcement is made in an attitude that implies they are criminals, a paria group. On the face of it, we can say why not implement it.? It's a primitive method of heating, so why not ban it?. Already, when the family is reeling from the announcement, it is sucker-punched by having to deal with an automatic devalue of his home at the same time. No compensation plan could be found to help them out that would soften the blow of the legislation effect. The threat alone casts aspersions on any unfortunate family who manages to augment his heating expenses in this way, and by owning such a home, it is immediately devalued by it.
I would suggest the people should start to lobby now on this attack on our basic common British law, that states we have a right to heat our homes and have shelter and feed our familiies using the resources that are available around us. This scene is reminise of the treatment of the Irish by the British and their trying to sustain a living is similar freezing conditions. But if we dig deeper past this travesty on our foundational rights that protect us and keep our children and families warm and alive, lets study this case a bit closer.
The pollution is one factor for implementing the law. But then we recall that Ontario was pretty well all forest before there was any farming. Nature replenished the forest allowing differing species to grow by burning off the higher canopy by lightning storms, which allowed the sun to shine in to the ground flora. Vast areas were consumed at once, with polution gaining higher than 11% at times. We can see immediately that wood burn particles in the atmosphere is a natural occurance in nature. At no time in history did nature by the use of lightning strikes, ignite #1 or #2 furnace oil so that it's burning byproducts would enter the atmosphere as a plan for the regeneration of the forest.
So if we know there is some natural level of wood particles in the air, what is the real contributor that is the alien hiding in that atmospheric mix? It's the coal and oil burning, and carbon contributors. It makes sense to the policy makers. If they can get rid of the wood burning, that will give them an additional 11% edge in points to meet their international commitments. That will buy them time and get the watchdogs off their backs while they keep burning carbon fuels at current volumes.
But can we believe what is said to us on face value? Quebec is one of the major proponents of this new policy. How does that explain the kneejerk implementation of measures to introduce artificial forest burning in the Montmorency region in order to help out the suffering plant species in the park. It would seem plants have higher priority than keeping babies and families warm. Now you have one fact, there are others.
Finally, we need to forensically weed out the possibility that those who have the most to gain out of it, aren't hypocritically lobbying to pad their pockets by lessening the odds of payouts to homeowners of wood stove owners, yes, I'm talking about the insurance companies, oil companies and their distributors.
We as citizens have a duty to watch out for our neighbour, and insure he is being dealt fairly. We need to examine all the facts. This is a time for fact gathering, not a lynch mob mentality. We need to ensure that a specific case follows with a reasonable transition period for those affected. It does not call for a threat at this stage.
These are not criminals as the government implies by the threats, they are families tring to keep warm using the same age old methods that nature intended for them to use, and helped to give birth to our very species. It is not their fault that mankind as changed the planet to a point where this method cannot be used.
Don't fall for the hype, question your member of parliament, get real facts, and ensure that your fellow citizens are fairly treated in any new legislation implemented.
I would suggest the people should start to lobby now on this attack on our basic common British law, that states we have a right to heat our homes and have shelter and feed our familiies using the resources that are available around us. This scene is reminise of the treatment of the Irish by the British and their trying to sustain a living is similar freezing conditions. But if we dig deeper past this travesty on our foundational rights that protect us and keep our children and families warm and alive, lets study this case a bit closer.
The pollution is one factor for implementing the law. But then we recall that Ontario was pretty well all forest before there was any farming. Nature replenished the forest allowing differing species to grow by burning off the higher canopy by lightning storms, which allowed the sun to shine in to the ground flora. Vast areas were consumed at once, with polution gaining higher than 11% at times. We can see immediately that wood burn particles in the atmosphere is a natural occurance in nature. At no time in history did nature by the use of lightning strikes, ignite #1 or #2 furnace oil so that it's burning byproducts would enter the atmosphere as a plan for the regeneration of the forest.
So if we know there is some natural level of wood particles in the air, what is the real contributor that is the alien hiding in that atmospheric mix? It's the coal and oil burning, and carbon contributors. It makes sense to the policy makers. If they can get rid of the wood burning, that will give them an additional 11% edge in points to meet their international commitments. That will buy them time and get the watchdogs off their backs while they keep burning carbon fuels at current volumes.
But can we believe what is said to us on face value? Quebec is one of the major proponents of this new policy. How does that explain the kneejerk implementation of measures to introduce artificial forest burning in the Montmorency region in order to help out the suffering plant species in the park. It would seem plants have higher priority than keeping babies and families warm. Now you have one fact, there are others.
Finally, we need to forensically weed out the possibility that those who have the most to gain out of it, aren't hypocritically lobbying to pad their pockets by lessening the odds of payouts to homeowners of wood stove owners, yes, I'm talking about the insurance companies, oil companies and their distributors.
We as citizens have a duty to watch out for our neighbour, and insure he is being dealt fairly. We need to examine all the facts. This is a time for fact gathering, not a lynch mob mentality. We need to ensure that a specific case follows with a reasonable transition period for those affected. It does not call for a threat at this stage.
These are not criminals as the government implies by the threats, they are families tring to keep warm using the same age old methods that nature intended for them to use, and helped to give birth to our very species. It is not their fault that mankind as changed the planet to a point where this method cannot be used.
Don't fall for the hype, question your member of parliament, get real facts, and ensure that your fellow citizens are fairly treated in any new legislation implemented.
