Venezuela Seen as Major Beneficiary of Obama's Keystone XL Snub

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Venezuela Seen as Major Beneficiary of Obama's Keystone XL Snub



President Barack Obama’s rejection of TransCanada Corp.’s proposed Keystone XL pipeline could give Venezuela’s ailing economy a lifeline.

With the world’s largest oil reserves, the South American country produces heavy crude that’s similar in consistency to the one coming from Canada’s oil sands, and its economy relies largely on shipping it to the same U.S. Gulf Coast refineries that Keystone XL was meant to supply.

“The number one beneficiary of all this will be Venezuela and other suppliers of heavy oil that ship to the Gulf Coast by tanker,” IHS Energy Inc. Vice President Jim Burkhard said by e-mail.

Venezuela is facing an economic crisis as the price of crude, its main source of revenue, has plummeted by more than half since June last year to trade below $50 a barrel. The slump has caused a rift within the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, of which Venezuela is a member, as Saudi Arabia continues to pump crude from the ground at an unprecedented pace.

“Venezuela is facing what could end up being the largest external shock of its history,” Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Research analysts Francisco Rodriguez and Jane Brauer wrote in a Nov. 4 note to clients.

The nation has reacted to the crisis through a combination of import cuts and asset depletion and may further curb imports, they said.
Petroleum Income

Venezuela is more reliant than ever on petroleum earnings, which account for 95 percent of export income and almost half of government revenues, according to the country’s foreign ministry.

Venezuela’s Oil Minister Eulogio Del Pino last month said the country was exporting around 2.4 million barrels a day. Of that total, 1.3 million are destined for China and India. In August, Venezuela sent an estimated 935,000 barrels a day of oil to the U.S., according to EIA data.

Keystone XL, rejected Friday by Obama, would have spanned 1,179 miles (1,897 kilometers) from Alberta through three states -- Montana, North Dakota, and Nebraska -- before connecting to an existing pipeline network feeding crude to the Gulf refineries.

Obama, siding with an assessment from the State Department, said the Keystone XL project isn’t in the U.S. national interest and that it "would not make a meaningful long-term contribution to our national economy." He said it wouldn’t lower domestic gasoline and wouldn’t bolster U.S. energy security.

“This decision puts to shame Venezuela’s allegations that Obama is waging an economic war on Venezuela," Carlos Rossi, president of Caracas-based consulting firm EnergyNomics, said in a phone interview. "If Obama wanted to wage an economic war on Venezuela, approving this pipeline would have been an excellent way to do it. ”

Source: Venezuela Seen as Major Beneficiary of Obama's Keystone XL Snub - Bloomberg Business
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
5,726
3,599
113
Edmonton
Obama, siding with an assessment from the State Department, said the Keystone XL project isn’t in the U.S. national interest and that it "would not make a meaningful long-term contribution to our national economy." He said it wouldn’t lower domestic gasoline and wouldn’t bolster U.S. energy security.




So when did the State Department do any assessing? They had several environmental assessments, all of which said that the pipeline was environmentally safe. In fact, Obama had them review it a few times and they came back each time saying that it should be ok'd. This has nothing to do with the environment but everything to do with Politics.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
The U.S. imports almost three times as much crude from Canada than it does from the Persian Gulf

Even without the 800 MBOPD capacity of TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline, crude oil imports from Canada make up 45% of crude shipped into the United States. As of August, imports from Canada were almost three times as much as imports from all of the countries in the Persian Gulf combined.

The United States has been the primary destination for Canada’s crude oil exports since the early 2000s. Based on data through the first half of this year from Canada’s National Energy Board, 99% of Canada’s crude oil exports were sent to the United States. More than half of these volumes went to petroleum refineries in the Midwest (Petroleum Administration for Defense District, PADD 2).

EIA estimates only 3% of Canadian crude comes by rail, rest travels south via existing pipelines

As U.S. crude imports fall, Canada’s share grows
 

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
I'm so confused, which pipeline isn’t in the U.S. national interest and could become an unsafe and cause an environmental mess. How safe are they?



All this is about is Alberta Oil which is deemed to be dirty by fukking environmentalists. Nothing more, just politics plain and simple. Votes.

Same BS with Justin Trudeau, I will legalize Pot.. great every loser teen and his cousin is now out and voting.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
Blocking the Keystone good for Canada. As I see it the foreign owned companies
were going to ship our resource south to refineries in Texas to be refined and then
exported for much higher prices. It is time we turned our pipelines East/West and
from there serviced our own market and export the excess for much higher prices.
I am not against pipelines I am against pipelines that don't benefit the majority of
Canadians
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
10,607
5,250
113
Olympus Mons
I see this as Obama once again spitting in the face of not only one of America's long-time traditional allies, but probably their only true friend on the planet.


Here's some more fun facts. Canada as a nation of 35 million people produces 550 million tonnes of CO2 every year. That's when our oil fields were running full bore. That amount it half the emission production from international shipping.
Here's where it gets interesting. The US produces 5 billion tonnes of CO2 every year. Now some of you might say, "Well that makes sense Jin, the US has 10 times the population" and you'd be right. But, while the US only has a quarter of the population of China, it produces half of what China does in a year.


The real culprit is America and we're the ones being sh*t on for it.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
Blocking the Keystone good for Canada. As I see it the foreign owned companies
were going to ship our resource south to refineries in Texas to be refined and then
exported for much higher prices. It is time we turned our pipelines East/West and
from there serviced our own market and export the excess for much higher prices.
I am not against pipelines I am against pipelines that don't benefit the majority of
Canadians


B*tch please. That oil is getting here regardless. Turn those pipelines east and west... the product ends up in Texas regardless.