Cuckolding for male feminists

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65


What Open Marriage Taught One Man About Feminism -- The Cut



So this is being sold as the natural, inevitable endpoint of progressive feminism: Cuckolding for male feminists.

You do you, I guess, and Paolo will do your wife.

What's with the interracial element in all this cuckolding stuff? This writer is obviously using pseudonyms; I assume he's white, because no other race's men would be so full of small-ball self-loathing as to actively desire sexual humiliation.

So he could have called the paramour Peter or Paul; but no, it has to be Paolo, because he needs you to know that a man of a different race is all up inside his wife, and he's cool with that -- in fact, he's excited by it.

Why?

I have my theories.

The opposite of White Supremacy should not be that white males are so full of self-loathing they actively desire their wives to be screwed by men of other races, so that they can experience what sex with a real man is like.

I do not favor White Supremacy, nor White Pride, but I gotta tell you, the pendulum swing towards White Self-Loathing is abhorrent.

Then again, as a man who's both comfortable with my sexuality and my race, I guess it's possible I can have sex with these quavering jelly-men's pseudowives.

So, I guess, fine by me. Let's change it to You Do You, and I'll do your wife, you sub-beta puddle of nothing at all.

More: She Reasoned Him Into It. Not sure he really was convinced by this, or he already wanted his wife to see what sex with a Real Man was like, and this was merely the pretext he accepted to have his fantasies come true:
She didn't present it as an issue of feminism to me, but after much soul-searching about why the idea of my wife having sex with other men bothered me I came to a few conclusions: Monogamy meant I controlled her sexual expression, and, not to get all women's-studies major about it, patriarchal oppression essentially boils down to a man's fear that a woman with sexual agency is a woman he can't control.​
I wish I had one-tenth the argumentative skills of this... um, sexually-adventurous woman.


Ace of Spades HQ



I think we may have discovered a new strata of maleness below beta. :lol:
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
He keeps calling himself a man I don't think that word means what he thinks it means.

 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON


What Open Marriage Taught One Man About Feminism -- The Cut



So this is being sold as the natural, inevitable endpoint of progressive feminism: Cuckolding for male feminists.

You do you, I guess, and Paolo will do your wife.

What's with the interracial element in all this cuckolding stuff? This writer is obviously using pseudonyms; I assume he's white, because no other race's men would be so full of small-ball self-loathing as to actively desire sexual humiliation.

So he could have called the paramour Peter or Paul; but no, it has to be Paolo, because he needs you to know that a man of a different race is all up inside his wife, and he's cool with that -- in fact, he's excited by it.

Why?

I have my theories.

The opposite of White Supremacy should not be that white males are so full of self-loathing they actively desire their wives to be screwed by men of other races, so that they can experience what sex with a real man is like.

I do not favor White Supremacy, nor White Pride, but I gotta tell you, the pendulum swing towards White Self-Loathing is abhorrent.

Then again, as a man who's both comfortable with my sexuality and my race, I guess it's possible I can have sex with these quavering jelly-men's pseudowives.

So, I guess, fine by me. Let's change it to You Do You, and I'll do your wife, you sub-beta puddle of nothing at all.

More: She Reasoned Him Into It. Not sure he really was convinced by this, or he already wanted his wife to see what sex with a Real Man was like, and this was merely the pretext he accepted to have his fantasies come true:
She didn't present it as an issue of feminism to me, but after much soul-searching about why the idea of my wife having sex with other men bothered me I came to a few conclusions: Monogamy meant I controlled her sexual expression, and, not to get all women's-studies major about it, patriarchal oppression essentially boils down to a man's fear that a woman with sexual agency is a woman he can't control.​
I wish I had one-tenth the argumentative skills of this... um, sexually-adventurous woman.


Ace of Spades HQ



I think we may have discovered a new strata of maleness below beta. :lol:

What does race have to do with this? I'm sure there are willing cuckoldo of all races. That said, while I would hope to have the inner strength to be able to forgive my wife for it if such a thing ever happened, as submissive as I may be in the relationship, willing cuckolding crosses a line I can't understand.

To my mind at least, any man who actively encourages his wife to cuckold him needs help.

Could explain how Flossy ended up with kids.

Ouch!

Now as for being caged, that's another matter :)
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Do you know what white liberal guilt is?

Dude, he's such a whiny bitch. And ever since he caught that train, I think he's forgotten what being 'man' really means.

I think I know what white liberal guilt is: "defend your privileges and then preach about how privileged you are?" or something along those lines?

As for Flossy, are you accusing him of being a gigolo?
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I think I know what white liberal guilt is: "defend your privileges and then preach about how privileged you are?" or something along those lines?

As for Flossy, are you accusing him of being a gigolo?
Ummm, no, and no.
 

grainfedpraiboy

Electoral Member
Mar 15, 2009
715
1
18
Alberta The Last Best West
If you look at sex from an anthropological perspective certain key elements have carried over into modern sexual behaviour. First there is female copulatory vocalisation which is the universal cross culture type moaning of females which primes males for sex. It is a signal considered to prime multiple males to mate with a single female which was most likely the normal form of conception in small hunter gather groups prior to modern pair bonding in larger more socially complex societies.

This evolutionary trait is called sperm competition. Men produce higher sperm counts when they are involved in direct competition with other men, have killer sperm to hunt out other men's sperm in the ****** and the head of a human ***** is shaped like a plunger in order to dislodge and remove another man's sperm.

Therapists have advised couples who have difficulty achieving conception due to low sperm count to include another male in the bedroom as the counts skyrocket due to competition. Even leaving your wife for a few days cranks up the sperm and count and desire for sex as the subconscious desperately wants to deposit sperm in her ****** to destroy anyone elses.

Males are hardwired to have sex this way as evidenced by mainstream porn. Cuckolding is a perverse extension of this evolutionary trait.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
And on the subject of raising the s perm count, she only needs to lock him up in a cage for a month and dangle the key around her neck. By the end of the month, he'll be drooling sperm.

The story in the OP appears to be more related to hedonism in my view.... But then again, I have no clue as to how buddy could possible agree to this sort of thing, so what the hell do I know?

Good point. I can see a man forgiving his wife for having cuckolded him, but for a man to actively encourage herror to do so is beyond my ability to comprehend.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
anybody bother reading the original article? The HQ guy is a fu cking moron. Has no idea what he is talking about, and it appears at least half the posters in here are in the same boat.


"How does it work? We take turns going out. Because we have small children (ages 6 and 3), one of us stays home. (We don’t like to use babysitters because it gives us a curfew; we’d rather go out unfettered than worry about turning into a pumpkin at midnight.) Going out alone to hooking up with others was an easy transition."
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
One thing I don't get about the article. I have sex only with my wife and don't feel the least bit oppressed by it. In fact, I'd feel oppressed at heart if I did stray.

That said, I don't spy on my wife but trust and believe that she would not cuckold me. She could easily stray without my knowing if she wanted to, so though I would never consent to her having sex with someone else, I don't see how I'm oppressing her given that she has opportunities every week to stray behind my back if she wanted to. The article seems to suggest that by not consenting to it if she asked, that I would be oppressing her somehow.