As if flying isn't bad enough

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
Airplane cabin's face-to-face design draws ire of travellers



It’s only a proposal, an "exploratory concept" that would force flyers to face each other in-flight. But already the patent, submitted by one of the largest airline seat makers in the world, is drawing the ire of the Internet with critics using words like "nightmarish," "horrifying" and "evil" to describe the reimagined cabin configuration.

Because in its designs for the Economy Class Cabin Hexagon, French firm Zodiac Seats proposes turning the middle seat around so that flyer is forced to face his or her seatmates throughout the entire flight.

The logic? Reconfiguring the cabin’s traditional forward-facing rows into an hexagonal design would add 30 additional seats, eliminate fights for the elbow rest and give passengers up to four more inches of legroom, says Zodiac.


But the idea of having to spend the duration of a flight trying awkwardly to avoid eye contact with seatmates is enough to draw howls of protest and indignation from the Internet.

In fairness, the proposal is meant for short-haul flights.

But that doesn’t seem to dull the reactions to having to look seatmates in the eye.

"Evil plane seat design would ruin whatever good remains of air travel," writes The Verge, for example, which pulls out all the stops in describing the plan, calling it everything from "nightmarish" and "dystopian."

Furthermore, the concept would exponentially increase the potential for "rampant butt touching," they point out.

But could a plan for aft-facing airplane seats really be any worse than bicycle-saddle seats?

Because last year, a similar scenario played out on the Internet when we got wind of another patent that proposed turning traditional seats into bike-style saddles to cram more people onto the plane.

The seat was described as a "torture device" and "terrifying" and "painful."


Airplane cabin's face-to-face design draws ire of travellers | CTV News

 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
It's done on most other mass transit vehicles where you sit or stand every which way, why not on planes.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
Better. No biting the seat ahead of you because there isn't one. Airliners are built for midgets. I always sit in the emergency exit row to get the extra leg room.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
If everyone faced the stern I wouldn't have posed the question. This solution is for bigger profit - not passenger safety. It makes about as much sense as switching to right hand drive - but for trucks and busses only
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
If everyone faced the stern I wouldn't have posed the question. This solution is for bigger profit - not passenger safety. It makes about as much sense as switching to right hand drive - but for trucks and busses only

Airlines don't give sh-t about passengers, they make their money on cargo.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
Cargo is far better insured nor does it vary in weight by 200kg for one ticket. Passenger fares should be set by the kg.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
Airplane cabin's face-to-face design draws ire of travellers



It’s only a proposal, an "exploratory concept" that would force flyers to face each other in-flight. But already the patent, submitted by one of the largest airline seat makers in the world, is drawing the ire of the Internet with critics using words like "nightmarish," "horrifying" and "evil" to describe the reimagined cabin configuration.

Because in its designs for the Economy Class Cabin Hexagon, French firm Zodiac Seats proposes turning the middle seat around so that flyer is forced to face his or her seatmates throughout the entire flight.

The logic? Reconfiguring the cabin’s traditional forward-facing rows into an hexagonal design would add 30 additional seats, eliminate fights for the elbow rest and give passengers up to four more inches of legroom, says Zodiac.


But the idea of having to spend the duration of a flight trying awkwardly to avoid eye contact with seatmates is enough to draw howls of protest and indignation from the Internet.

In fairness, the proposal is meant for short-haul flights.

But that doesn’t seem to dull the reactions to having to look seatmates in the eye.

"Evil plane seat design would ruin whatever good remains of air travel," writes The Verge, for example, which pulls out all the stops in describing the plan, calling it everything from "nightmarish" and "dystopian."

Furthermore, the concept would exponentially increase the potential for "rampant butt touching," they point out.

But could a plan for aft-facing airplane seats really be any worse than bicycle-saddle seats?

Because last year, a similar scenario played out on the Internet when we got wind of another patent that proposed turning traditional seats into bike-style saddles to cram more people onto the plane.

The seat was described as a "torture device" and "terrifying" and "painful."


Airplane cabin's face-to-face design draws ire of travellers | CTV News


Um, yeah. People are going to die.....because they will murder each other. Nobody wants to be face to face with a stranger for a transatlantic flight. 8O