At home with the KKK


Locutus
#1
Family of four open door to their life inside the hate-filled Ku Klux Klan as they train to wage a 'race-war'

  • Secret Ku Klux Klan rally in West Virginia attracts families with their hate-filled rhetoric
  • Racist group wants to train members to use weapons for the first time in its history
  • Believes the United States government is going to fail and a civil war will follow
  • Trying to attract new members with secret pledges offered to teenagers


The notorious Ku Klux Klan have opened the doors to their secretive and hate-filled world as they prepare to train their members in military style combat for the first time.

Insistent that a racial civil war inside the United States is imminent, one family belonging to the Loyal White Knights (LWK) allowed cameras to follow them to a secret Klan meeting in Parkersburg, West Virginia.

Mum, Amanada, dad, Sam and their two boys, Mike, 14 and Dustin, 11, attended the rally in late April, where members openly spat the 'n-word' and screams of white power could be heard echoing from huts across the remote field.


more


At home with the KKK: Family of four open door to their life inside the hate-filled Ku Klux Klan as they train to wage a 'race-war' | Mail Online




 
WLDB
+2
#2
Yet the cowards still won't show their faces. The guy in the hood playing guitar was particularly funny.
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#3
Nice of 'em to wear those targets on their robes. Should save some ammo.
 
Sal
#4
This is really Obama's fault...he should have changed colour before entering the "White" House

So their plan is to begin a race war.

They could be charged as terrorists, no?
 
Tecumsehsbones
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by SalView Post

This is really Obama's fault...he should have changed colour before entering the "White" House

So their plan is to begin a race war.

They could be charged as terrorists, no?

Nah, "whiny little moron" still ain't a crime. There's half a dozen of their fellow travellers here on the board. No harm in 'em.
 
Sal
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

Nah, "whiny little moron" still ain't a crime. There's half a dozen of their fellow travellers here on the board. No harm in 'em.

no seriously...can they be charged with terrorism?

they are armed and training recruits
 
Corduroy
+1
#7
I don't see how Locutus' family pictures belong in Hot Topics. I don't want to be a stickler for form or anything, but it is confusing. Shouldn't this go in the Members Lounge?
 
B00Mer
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by SalView Post

"White" House

Is it still the "White" House, I thought we were being PC here.. The "African American" House.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by SalView Post

no seriously...can they be charged with terrorism?

they are armed and training recruits

Not until they actually do something. Then, if we wanted to, we could round 'em all up for "material support to terrorists." Not worth it, though. First, it'd be a hard case to make against any but the actual shooters/burners/rapists/what-have-you. Second, they'd likely commit their crimes close to home, so the jury'd be packed with people who think like they do. And they've at least got the mother-wit to understand the difference between "preparing for a race war" (legal) and "planning to start a race war" (conspiracy).
 
Sal
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by CorduroyView Post

I don't see how Locutus' family pictures belong in Hot Topics. I don't want to be a stickler for form or anything, but it is confusing. Shouldn't this go in the Members Lounge?

that's a pretty heavy accusation Corduroy you might want to back up a bit
 
B00Mer
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

Then, if we wanted to, we could round 'em all up for "material support to terrorists." Not worth it, though.

You mean like Obama did by giving back 4 top leaders to a Terrorist Organization the Taliban?
 
Sal
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

Not until they actually do something. Then, if we wanted to, we could round 'em all up for "material support to terrorists." Not worth it, though. First, it'd be a hard case to make against any but the actual shooters/burners/rapists/what-have-you. Second, they'd likely commit their crimes close to home, so the jury'd be packed with people who think like they do. And they've at least got the mother-wit to understand the difference between "preparing for a race war" (legal) and "planning to start a race war" (conspiracy).

do you see them as a danger?

I mean to more than themselves
 
lone wolf
#13
What's with the black-robed um person? Isn't that close to lynchbait - daring to be different?
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by SalView Post

do you see them as a danger?

I mean to more than themselves

Not really. I see them as a bunch of knuckleheads running around in the woods banging away with their semi-autos. If a few of them ever did get active, what they'd probably do is kill a non-white person or two, and be rounded up pretty quickly. If they ever got serious in platoon-size or larger groups, we'd send in the pros.

Could they cause some death? Yeah. And I don't mean to minimise that, but they've been around for over a century in one form or another, and after the cops stopped supporting and facilitating them, their kill total dropped to near zero.

Also, non-whites tend to fight back these days.
 
Blackleaf
+2
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by B00MerView Post

Is it still the "White" House, I thought we were being PC here.. The "African American" House.


No. It's the White House.

Because it's white.

Quote: Originally Posted by SalView Post

They could be charged as terrorists, no?

They're nowhere near as much a threat to the national security of the USA as the Black Panthers were.
 
lone wolf
+2
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

No. It's the White House.

Because it's white.



They're nowhere near as much a threat to the national security of the USA as the Black Panthers were.

...white-washed that way when Washington was raided in the War of 1812 and the whatever-colour-it-was house was scorched (Hence the term "whitewashing)
 
Sal
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

Not really. I see them as a bunch of knuckleheads running around in the woods banging away with their semi-autos. If a few of them ever did get active, what they'd probably do is kill a non-white person or two, and be rounded up pretty quickly. If they ever got serious in platoon-size or larger groups, we'd send in the pros.

Could they cause some death? Yeah. And I don't mean to minimise that, but they've been around for over a century in one form or another, and after the cops stopped supporting and facilitating them, their kill total dropped to near zero.

Also, non-whites tend to fight back these days.

Thanks.

I found the last line amusing somehow.
 
pgs
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

Nah, "whiny little moron" still ain't a crime. There's half a dozen of their fellow travellers here on the board. No harm in 'em.

Yup and your brave warriors dress in camo and cover their faces . Why do your brave warriors hide their faces when they are terrorizing
innocent people ?

Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

Not until they actually do something. Then, if we wanted to, we could round 'em all up for "material support to terrorists." Not worth it, though. First, it'd be a hard case to make against any but the actual shooters/burners/rapists/what-have-you. Second, they'd likely commit their crimes close to home, so the jury'd be packed with people who think like they do. And they've at least got the mother-wit to understand the difference between "preparing for a race war" (legal) and "planning to start a race war" (conspiracy).

Yup back to Crooked Knee .
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by pgsView Post

Yup and your brave warriors dress in camo and cover their faces . Why do your brave warriors hide their faces when they are terrorizing
innocent people ?


Yup back to Crooked Knee .

Sorry you feel like I insulted your heroes. Didn't mean to.

No, wait. . . I did.
 
WLDB
+3
#20  Top Rated Post
Quote: Originally Posted by B00MerView Post

Is it still the "White" House, I thought we were being PC here.. The "African American" House.

Could go Morgan Freeman instead - "Im not an African American, I'm an American."
 
Blackleaf
+1
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolfView Post

...white-washed that way when Washington was raided in the War of 1812 and the whatever-colour-it-was house was scorched (Hence the term "whitewashing)

That's a myth. It's a common belief that during the rebuilding of the White House after the fire white paint was applied to it to mask the scorch marks, giving it its namesake hue.

However, the building was white to begin with, and was first dubbed "The White House" in 1811, three years before the British set it ablaze.
 
pgs
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

Sorry you feel like I insulted your heroes. Didn't mean to.

No, wait. . . I did.

No I don't take offense from what idiots post on an internet chat room , but carry on making an a-- s of yourself .
Why again do your brave native warriors insist on hiding their faces ?
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by pgsView Post

No I don't take offense from what idiots post on an internet chat room , but carry on making an a-- s of yourself .
Why again do your brave native warriors insist on hiding their faces ?

I don't have any brave native warriors. But you go right ahead on with your delusion.
 
lone wolf
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by BlackleafView Post

That's a myth. It's a common belief that during the rebuilding of the White House after the fire white paint was applied to it to mask the scorch marks, giving it its namesake hue.

However, the building was white to begin with, and was first dubbed "The White House" in 1811, three years before the British set it ablaze.

Gee ... and here I thought I gave you something you could fit into your practice of "GREAT Britain" propaganda. Once again I am humbled by the know-it-all Brit
 
pgs
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

I don't have any brave native warriors. But you go right ahead on with your delusion.

Yup and they aren't my KKK either .
And what race is white ?
 
IdRatherBeSkiing
+1
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolfView Post

What's with the black-robed um person? Isn't that close to lynchbait - daring to be different?

Probably the teenager rebelling against his parent's authority and stuff. Some dye their hair or get a tattoo -- he got a black robe.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by pgsView Post

Yup and they aren't my KKK either .
And what race is white ?

You're the one who started the "your brave warriors" sh*t. So I gave you your own back. Go get Mommy to kiss it and make it better.
 
Locutus
#28
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

You're the one who started




Maybe it was something you said earlier to him kid.

Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

What a poor little butthurt white boy.


I could be wrong but you do seem mad at times about:
Quote: Originally Posted by TecumsehsbonesView Post

some butthurt white guy

Have a nice day.
 
DaSleeper
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by LocutusView Post




Maybe it was something you said earlier to him kid.




I could be wrong but you do seem mad at times about:

Have a nice day.


A couple of years ago, I was in parked in a campground, near Sturgeon Falls for a week, Pickin' and grinnin'...Jamming with a neighbour there before I found out he was not only a lawyer but a provincial court judge.....and even that was accidental because he had a visitor who knew him professionally...
And here we have a poster who can't stop mentioning ad nauzeum that he's a lawyer and an injun besides
 
Locutus
#30
'special needs'
 
no new posts