Papal Pari-Mutuels- Place Your Bets Here!


Spade
#1
Conclave begins next week. Who will be elected? Canuck Oulette? Petrus Romanus? Your favourite?
After unfocused meetings, cardinals to vote for pope next week | National Catholic Reporter
 
L Gilbert
+1
#2
Not me. I declined nomination due to sanity and level-headedness. Atheism might have had a hand in my declination, too.
 
Spade
+2
#3
For our American brothers, all bets are off. Apparently papal gambling is illegal in the "good ole USA"! Why? I don't have the Vegas idea!

Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

Not me. I declined nomination due to sanity and level-headedness. Atheism might have had a hand in my declination, too.

Geezus, you would've had my vote.

Profile of Cardinal Ouellet | National Catholic Reporter
Seems Ouellet is odds on favourite.
Last edited by Spade; Mar 8th, 2013 at 12:10 PM..
 
L Gilbert
+1
#4
Quote: Originally Posted by SpadeView Post

Geezus, you would've had my vote.

Apparently you've been afflicted by sanity and level-headedness, too, then.
 
Goober
+2
#5
Me I bet it will be another man that wins. Seems that it is always the other guy. Rather odd I say.
 
Spade
+3
#6
Well, we've narrowed it down to a man.
 
Goober
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by SpadeView Post

Well, we've narrowed it down to a man.

That takes about 50% of the population of 1.2 Billion Catholics off the list. That narrows it down quite a bit. 600 Million less.
 
Spade
+2
#8
Pity, because a woman would've cleaned up the Vatican!
 
Goober
+5
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by SpadeView Post

Pity, because a woman would've cleaned up the Vatican!

Rather sexist coming from you. Men can clean as well.
 
Cliffy
+6
#10  Top Rated Post
I predict that if the new pope is a progressive type, we will hear no end of whining from Coldstream.
 
L Gilbert
+2
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

I predict that if the new pope is a progressive type, we will hear no end of whining from Coldstream.

Progressive? As in post 13th century? You're probably right.
 
Spade
+1
#12
Ever wonder why the gods allow men in dresses to make decisions for us?
 
L Gilbert
+2
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by SpadeView Post

Ever wonder why the gods allow men in dresses to make decisions for us?

Sadistic sense of humor?
 
Cliffy
+2
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by SpadeView Post

Ever wonder why the gods allow men in dresses to make decisions for us?

Only ones from a certain club. Most men in dresses are shunned even by the ones in that certain club.
 
Spade
#15
O O'Brien, where art thou?

Papal conclave to begin March 12 - World - CBC News
 
Spade
#16
Dressed to the nines and nowhere to go...
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/10/fa...w-nytimes&_r=0
 
petros
+2
#17
Vote for Pedro
 
damngrumpy
+1
#18
It will likely make no difference, they will elect some conservative guy with the hammer
to continue to lose members and do nothing to improve the condition of the faith.
I left this organization a long time ago, because they refused to move into the twentieth
century
 
Spade
#19
So far, Petrus is the favourite at 5:2.
Online contests let you pick the next pope, learn about Catholicism | StarTribune.com
 
Spade
#20
The latest odds; come on peek, it's not a cardinal sin.
With conclave looming, all bets are on | National Catholic Reporter
 
Dexter Sinister
+2
#21
My bet: it'll be one of 115 men, he will be very conservative and orthodox, he will wear red shoes and a pointy hat, the church will make no progress under his guidance on matters like homosexuality, ordination of women, married priests, contraception, divorce, and remarriage after divorce, and it will continue to lose membership. The church equates modernization with moral decay, as Coldstream often reminds us, because it knows that full modernization would render it largely irrelevant, so that's not going to happen. Nothing will change.
 
Sal
+1
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by Dexter SinisterView Post

My bet: it'll be one of 115 men, he will be very conservative and orthodox, he will wear red shoes and a pointy hat, the church will make no progress under his guidance on matters like homosexuality, ordination of women, married priests, contraception, divorce, and remarriage after divorce, and it will continue to lose membership. The church equates modernization with moral decay, as Coldstream often reminds us, because it knows that full modernization would render it largely irrelevant, so that's not going to happen. Nothing will change.

I fear you are correct...but I have tiny moments of hope, that some of the old boys who know better will prevail.
 
Dexter Sinister
#23
I doubt any of the old boys voting DO know better, the College of Cardinals has been carefully stacked by the last two Popes with very orthodox conservatives. The last Pope who could reasonably be called progressive was John XXIII, and that was 50 years ago.
 
Sal
+1
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by Dexter SinisterView Post

I doubt any of the old boys voting DO know better, the College of Cardinals has been carefully stacked by the last two Popes with very orthodox conservatives. The last Pope who could reasonably be called progressive was John XXIII, and that was 50 years ago.

Yes the church has not moved forward much within the last 50 years and in some important ways it has regressed. When I was growing up, we were wild and mouthy but we had some priests that put huge time and effort into our youth group. They spent time with us. They allowed us to do things that would never be done today and in fact they would be charged. There was a bar at the back of the rectory where we got our (pop). It was understood that you could help yourself to a small bit of rum or whatever else was there. We did and would spend hours talking and having fun while we did community work.

Most of the young ones I see now are highly conservative and very regulated and very distant from our youth.
 
Spade
#25
Hans Kung- a voice of reason,
Countdown to the Conclave, Day 4: The New York Times and Hans Kung - International - Catholic Online
 
DaSleeper
+3
#26
Ironic that while browsing through this thread that one notices that it's mostly the atheists in this forum who seem to have an unatural facination with the Papacy
 
Spade
+1
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeperView Post

Ironic that while browsing through this thread that one notices that it's mostly the atheists in this forum who seem to have an unatural facination (sic) with the Papacy

How dare they!
 
DaSleeper
+1
#28
Quote: Originally Posted by SpadeView Post

How dare they!

You forgot (unatural)................
 
captain morgan
+2
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeperView Post

You forgot (unatural)................


You could probably add the word 'unhealthy' to that description
 
Cliffy
+2
#30
I only see two self proclaimed atheists in this thread, Les and Dex. Do you see others?
 

Similar Threads

4
The Race is on...Place your Bets?
by GreenFish66 | Jun 2nd, 2008
no new posts