A NEW Twist on Science

[CanadianLove]

Watch this guys series of videos - He puts a lot of present science out the window where it should be. And I like science.

I am really Impressed with this guy. He makes a lot of sense as he debunks some of the present science theories, and does provide rational theories and some expeiments that back him up. Right from - what is light, what an atom really looks like, why magnets attract, the slit experiment, and beyond. Some seem "Way out there." but if you are open minded (LOL) you may agree with him.

Maybe we should be thinking about rethinking science and the way it is taught and what is taught. Go back, and start over again, and this time, lets not throw out all the information that doesn't agree with the theories we want to use to get our names in the paper.

I will not answer any comments on it. I know the Trolls for present science are going to pounce all over it. There are over 30 videos so if you have a topic that you may want to disprove him, look at the list of videos.

I'm going to enjoy the rest of the series.

07 What is Light? - YouTube

 

[karrie]

Speaking of science, karrie's observations in psychology

The scientist started off interesting enough, but he completely lost me the instant he stated that 'the establishment has no idea....'.

You might ask yourself, why? Why karrie? Why would such a seemingly simple turn of phrase put you off and immediately set you to doubting his scientific credibility?

Recent travels in both the internet, and reality, have given me the joy of bumping shoulders with people who are, simply put, unique. They model their wardrobes, hobbies, political, and moral views around the notion that the most coveted thing to be in this world is, unique. They scoff at the establishment, they embrace contradiction. They want to be the one who stands out in history because they trod the path less taken. What they seem to miss is the fact that the very few unique individuals who make the history books, are outnumbered in large part, by the plethora of plain old weirdos and wrong people who never will.

Now, when it comes to science, the true downfall of this kind of mentality, is that it creates a bias in thinking, that makes an individual overly dismissive of common knowledge or concepts, and overly zealous to embrace the uncommon, regardless of how wrong they might be proven, in the hopes that they might go down in the history books as the next great mind. That means that the bias applied to their work is infinitely greater than the bias applied to the work of those who submit their work to peer review and are willing to be proven wrong. Thinkers like this CAN'T be proven wrong, intentionally setting up their presentations so that any criticism is easily brushed off or confounded with ridiculous slide shows that illuminate nothing, or explanations that the one questioning simply is too dim to get it. Or, even dismissed ahead of time as unwelcome.

Now... is his theory sound? God only knows from the gobbeldygook clip art slideshow I saw in there. i'd love a proper explanation of it. But I doubt this guy would ever give it.

And I'm sure the response, to this unwelcome discussion about the video submitted to a discussion forum, will be "I understood it!" Because, well, what's more unique than that hey?

 

[gerryh]

Speaking of science, karrie's observations in psychology

The scientist started off interesting enough, but he completely lost me the instant he stated that 'the establishment has no idea....'.

You might ask yourself, why? Why karrie? Why would such a seemingly simple turn of phrase put you off and immediately set you to doubting his scientific credibility?

Recent travels in both the internet, and reality, have given me the joy of bumping shoulders with people who are, simply put, unique. They model their wardrobes, hobbies, political, and moral views around the notion that the most coveted thing to be in this world is, unique. They scoff at the establishment, they embrace contradiction. They want to be the one who stands out in history because they trod the path less taken. What they seem to miss is the fact that the very few unique individuals who make the history books, are outnumbered in large part, by the plethora of plain old weirdos and wrong people who never will.

Now, when it comes to science, the true downfall of this kind of mentality, is that it creates a bias in thinking, that makes an individual overly dismissive of common knowledge or concepts, and overly zealous to embrace the uncommon, regardless of how wrong they might be proven, in the hopes that they might go down in the history books as the next great mind. That means that the bias applied to their work is infinitely greater than the bias applied to the work of those who submit their work to peer review and are willing to be proven wrong. Thinkers like this CAN'T be proven wrong, intentionally setting up their presentations so that any criticism is easily brushed off or confounded with ridiculous slide shows that illuminate nothing, or explanations that the one questioning simply is too dim to get it. Or, even dismissed ahead of time as unwelcome.

Now... is his theory sound? God only knows from the gobbeldygook clip art slideshow I saw in there. i'd love a proper explanation of it. But I doubt this guy would ever give it.

And I'm sure the response, to this unwelcome discussion about the video submitted to a discussion forum, will be "I understood it!" Because, well, what's more unique than that hey?

Wow.....




Ok guys... word of advice..... now is NOT the time to be pissing Karrie off. Just sayin.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

I will not answer any comments on it.

And I won't make any on it except for this one: that guy shows in the first two minutes that he doesn't know enough about what physics actually says about the nature of light to criticize it intelligently.

 

[L Gilbert]

07 What is Light? - YouTube

This guy just getting into high school? He looks a little old to be just entering highschool.

as Karrie said: "Now, when it comes to science, the true downfall of this kind of mentality, is that it creates a bias in thinking, that makes an individual overly dismissive of common knowledge or concepts, and overly zealous to embrace the uncommon, regardless of how wrong they might be proven, in the hopes that they might go down in the history books as the next great mind. That means that the bias applied to their work is infinitely greater than the bias applied to the work of those who submit their work to peer review and are willing to be proven wrong. Thinkers like this CAN'T be proven wrong, intentionally setting up their presentations so that any criticism is easily brushed off or confounded with ridiculous slide shows that illuminate nothing, or explanations that the one questioning simply is too dim to get it. Or, even dismissed ahead of time as unwelcome. "

 

[CanadianLove]

Look ahead on the playlist and you will see the videos of his papers eing published, rejected, Forum post cencored, Even thrown in jail for corporate espionage. he is quite up front about the whole thing. He has spoken at confrences in Austria (LHC) and China. I admit some is even a little out there, but it doesn't mean it is wrong.

I was taught the same **** in school as everyone else. But, now as I am older and seeing things from my own experiments and experiences, things just seem to jive with what they taught me. Not all the awswers are here, but a couple look like good explainations for differences for the theoretical outcome.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

That stuff you were taught in school was a dumbed down version probably about 20 years out of date of what physics actually understood at the time. You don't get the real stuff until you get at least to the third year of a degree program in a university physics department--at least that's when I began to get it--because before that you won't have the mathematical background to make sense of it. What you got, and what everybody who's not a physicist or an engineer gets, was the "simplifications told to children" variety of physics.

 

[CanadianLove]

That stuff you were taught in school was a dumbed down version probably about 20 years out of date of what physics actually understood at the time. You don't get the real stuff until you get at least to the third year of a degree program in a university physics department--at least that's when I began to get it--because before that you won't have the mathematical background to make sense of it. What you got, and what everybody who's not a physicist or an engineer gets, was the "simplifications told to children" variety of physics.

Still Dex, if the basics are wrong, how can the advanced be any better if it is based on the basics. To me there seems to be a lot of ass covering going on. I suppose that it is the same all around, but it is very frustrating. I used to work in a field that BS gets a guy killed really easy. You rely on the information you are receiving to be true. To me coming back into society after some time out of it am finding science to be more of a religion (I know it is a popular stereotype right now, but it is what it is) and don't get me on religion. There is not one organized religion that I would follow with my heart, and I'm mores religious than most ministers (as foul mouthed as I am).

 

[Dexter Sinister]

What makes you think the basics are wrong? Within their areas of application they are satisfactory descriptions of how nature behaves, and that's all you can expect from science. It lays no claim to proof or truth in any absolute sense.