Broadband usage growing worldwide: Australia

Cyberm4n

Electoral Member
Jun 6, 2002
259
0
16
43
Toronto
Australia's Broadband Picking Up Speed

Figures released by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, the Australian government's consumer watchdog agency, reveal that the number of broadband subscribers in Australia more than doubled in the last nine months, although the ACCC admits that's not saying much. The ACCC numbers track broadband subscribership via DSL, cable, satellite and a miniscule "other" category. They were tabulated from reports submitted by carriers, and compared to an ACCC snapshot of broadband penetration done in July, 2001. The ACCC says that, going forward, it plans to update the figures on a quarterly basis.

Overall, the commission found 251,500 broadband subscribers in the country as of March 31, a 105 percent increase over the previous figure. Most of that growth came in the DSL market which surged by 206 percent. Cable subscribership also grew by a more modest, but still impressive, 71 percent. Cable still holds the lion's share of the market, however.

Business subscribership grew at a stronger pace than residential subscribership during the period -- by 169 percent compared to 85 percent growth in residential service. Because of the higher business uptake, growth of XDSL, which typically appeals more to business users, outpaced ADSL growth 342 percent to 199 percent. Satellite subscribership grew by 245 percent and cable by 71 percent.

ACCC Chairman Professor Alan Fels called the numbers "promising," but admitted that "the overall number of services remains low." According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, there were 7.2 million households in the country as of June, 2000. ACCC's count of 192,900 subscribers works out to a residential penetration rate of just under 2.8 percent. This is despite Internet penetration better than 40 percent.

Fels warned ACCC will "continue to monitor this market, looking closely at any behaviour by those with market power to stifle competition through high prices or by holding back access to new services." Where necessary, he said, "the ACCC will act to change behaviour in the market."

Indeed ACCC can claim much of the credit for the surge in DSL growth precisely because of such action to change market behavior. Last September, ACCC issued a competition notice accusing Telstra of pricing wholesale DSL access so as to both keep competitive offerings from being economically viable and to keep competitors from offering services which differed substantially from Telstra's BigPond offering. Australian ISPs had protested that Telstra's DSL pricing was effectively equal to or even greater than its retail pricing. In December, Telstra cut wholesale prices by some 30 percent.

Beyond competitive pricing, however, are questions about the technical ability of Telstra's network to take the country to the next level of broadband access A contentious argument in the Australian Senate has resulted in an inquiry into the ability of the network's suitability for broadband service, particularly in the "regions" outside the country's more densely populated urban centers.

The opposition Democrats and Labor Party teamed up to force the inquiry on the ruling Liberal Party. Liberal Senator Richard Alston, Minister of Communications and Information Technology lambasted the inquiry as a Labor Party "kangaroo court," saying the opposition parties have made up their minds before seeing any evidence.

However Labor Senator Gavan O'Connor, Shadow Minister for Regional Services, said residents of Australia's remote areas know that government claims of improvements to the telecommunications infrastructure "do not apply everywhere." He claimed there is considerable pressure from regional business leaders, community groups, farmers and local government organizations on the issue. He said these constituencies see "inadequate telecommunications infrastructure, and limited broadband access, as a key impediment to regional development."

The inquiry is so politicized because of its proximity to the ongoing struggle over privatization of Telstra. Until that fight is resolved, both infrastructure upgrades and action from the ACCC may have a limited ability to accelerate Australia's struggling broadband growth.

>>ACCC Chairman Professor Alan Fels, tel: 02 6243 1111; Australian Labor Party Senator Gavan O'Connor, tel: 02 6120 0800; Liberal Party Senator Richard Alston, 02 6277 7480<<

This article first appeared in PBI Media’s Broadband Networking News
 

Cyberm4n

Electoral Member
Jun 6, 2002
259
0
16
43
Toronto
It's good to see the rest of the world is picking up on broadband usage. It just scares me to think that when these companies get their target userbase, they'll institute caps on it's users :(
 

Shmad

Electoral Member
Mar 24, 2002
550
0
16
Cache Creek, BC
www.justrant.com
Yeah and the sad thing is, the broadband in Austrailia is so much slower than it is here. Im not talking half the speed, Im talking a fraction of the speed, I know a number of users with it, they are happy with the speeds, but I dont think I would be. Of course the architecture there is still being upgraded so the speeds probably will pick up, which will be a good thing.

The main reason caps are being introduced here is:

a) People just download ISOs, movies, etc all month long... this wouldnt be a problem if they just downloaded the ones they want, but hey, lets see what they are ALL like so I can see if I wanna watch it or not.

b) People running servers from their personal connections. I mean come on if you want to run a server upgrade your package. Its hurting the rest of the residential users.

I myself do NOT abuse my connection, ok maybe the odd month I might download 10gb or so, but my usage is usually quite below that and I do quite a number of things.

I think CAPS are a good thing, its just the CAPS they are introducing are laughable. There has to be some moderation on usage.. there almost always has been on dialup as well in the past.

Once all backbones are like 999TB, then I dont see a cap issue at all, but then again thats a long ways off since all providers would have to update, and lets face it, the industry is going thru some tough times right now, and CAPS were inevitable. I saw the CAPS coming last year when the profit margins deminished.

Caps are good, the caps some companies are putting into effect are not.
 

Shmad

Electoral Member
Mar 24, 2002
550
0
16
Cache Creek, BC
www.justrant.com
Bob Carrick said:
Australia already has caps, and low caps.

Ah Im sorry I was doing 18 different things when I wrote that post, I was referring to North America having CAPs and how it is a good thing if you think of the long term picture.

Australian Cable service does have, and you are very right, low low caps. They also suffer from very low speeds, something about twice to 4 times the speed of an ISDN link in most areas, but they are upgrading. Just keep in mind that everything there is government regulated, including the content they can access from us crazy folks overseas ;)