
Sarah Palin is correct about the polar bears - they've doubled in population over the last 50 years and are far from extinct.

I'm only able to throw out these numbers above for the following reason....
I was listening to this Dr. Mitchell Taylor on the radio yesterday. He seems to
know his stuff (about Polar bears, anyway) as he's spent the last 30 years
studying them. He's a Polar Bear Biologist with the Dept. of the Environment
for the Government of Nunavut, Igloolik, Nunavut, Canada.


The thing about polar bears is really uncertain. The multi-year ice is disappearing fast, but it's not the ice that the bears hunt on, because the seals can't build dens in that thick ice. The polar bears hunt on the one-year ice that folds up with shifting winds and currents, and catches snow making drifts. There will always be one year ice. When people say ice free Arctic, that means no more multi-year sea ice. The one year old ice will always be there, except for extreme climate change where the temperature is above 0 year round.
The part that get's uncertain is how the population will be affected by shorter hunting seasons. When the multi-year ice disappears (probably around 2020), the Arctic waters are going to warm faster, accelerating the warming in the Arctic which is already 3 times the global rate. So the bears will have some ice, but not for long. I think what's likely to happen is that they become a nuisance species, instead of the apex predator. What that means for the Arctic is uncertain.

The thing about polar bears is really uncertain. The multi-year ice is disappearing fast, but it's not the ice that the bears hunt on, because the seals can't build dens in that thick ice. The polar bears hunt on the one-year ice that folds up with shifting winds and currents, and catches snow making drifts. There will always be one year ice. When people say ice free Arctic, that means no more multi-year sea ice. The one year old ice will always be there, except for extreme climate change where the temperature is above 0 year round.
The part that get's uncertain is how the population will be affected by shorter hunting seasons. When the multi-year ice disappears (probably around 2020), the Arctic waters are going to warm faster, accelerating the warming in the Arctic which is already 3 times the global rate. So the bears will have some ice, but not for long. I think what's likely to happen is that they become a nuisance species, instead of the apex predator. What that means for the Arctic is uncertain.

Lets see where you get your science from Tonnington. How about some links to that sea ice information you're pressing on us dullards.




I'm not. I don't need to show anyone pictures of bears on icebergs to discuss climate change. In fact if you read what I said, you'd see that I didn't even suggest that the polar bears are facing extinction, like many others do.

Anyone who thinks they can stop climate change by throwing money at it is on the same Ship....
You thing the climate has all of a sudden stabilized into one pattern?

Same thing every year?
Sorry but mother nature doesnt work that way,she will balance thing's out like allways and as past sediments have shown

Your kidding right?
You thing the climate has all of a sudden stabilized into one pattern?
Same thing every year?
Sorry but mother nature doesnt work that way,she will balance thing's out like allways and as past sediments have shown,**** happens,another ice age is inevitable,palm trees will be growing in the arctic again after that.

Mother Nature has her own way of working things out, If left alone, many times the ecosystem will recover. The problem is that Mother Nature is never left alone, man has a practically limitless capacity to pollute, to mess things up.
100 years ago, the very idea of humankind polluting the oceans would have seemed ridiculous, yet that is exactly what we are doing is devastating the oceans. In addition to over fishing (shark is on its way to extinction in many parts of the world), there is large scale dumping in the oceans, corals are dying out in many places.
And then of course, there is the attitude of complacency on the part of many. It isn’t really happening, there is no pollution, it is all a conspiracy by tree huggers and so on.
So yes, Mother Nature has her own cycle, her own rhythm. But humans have messed up the rhythm, the cycle pretty badly and will be totally disrupted in the future, if we continue going at the same rate.

Welcome to the club, Tonington. It has happened to me so many times (the reader reads what he wants to read, not what I have written) that I have lost count.