100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering


"The adjustments being correlate almost perfectly with atmospheric CO2. NOAA is adjusting the data to match global warming theory. This is known as PBEM (Policy Based Evidence Making.)"
100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

I won't C and P the whole article, but it clearly shows we are being hosed.
goes with the jail sentence for that other global warming guy
 

Wake

Electoral Member
Feb 17, 2017
112
0
16
Looks like the NOAA has taken a page outta East Anglia U's playbook
The questions are - NOAA and NASA scientists ARE complaining that their research is being distorted and/or misinterpreted. But the heads of these agencies continue following their plan of attack. And we're even led to believe that if the American Horticulturist Association supports their claims that it MUST be true.

At one time it was the job of the media to protect the citizens from these sorts of Hoaxes. Now they are the propaganda arm of the socialist party.

I was shown a picture of a ISIS member holding the severed head of a Christian. Beside it was a picture of this same man in Greece as he was being processed to come to America as a "refugee". The DHS has NO idea where this man is in this country now.

And these same "refugees" are now pouring out of America and into Canada via back roads that can't be protected by the rather inadequate Canadian border guards.

Perhaps we should start questioning how this is happening?
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
The questions are - NOAA and NASA scientists ARE complaining that their research is being distorted and/or misinterpreted. But the heads of these agencies continue following their plan of attack. And we're even led to believe that if the American Horticulturist Association supports their claims that it MUST be true.

At one time it was the job of the media to protect the citizens from these sorts of Hoaxes. Now they are the propaganda arm of the socialist party.

I was shown a picture of a ISIS member holding the severed head of a Christian. Beside it was a picture of this same man in Greece as he was being processed to come to America as a "refugee". The DHS has NO idea where this man is in this country now.

And these same "refugees" are now pouring out of America and into Canada via back roads that can't be protected by the rather inadequate Canadian border guards.

Perhaps we should start questioning how this is happening?

Perhaps you should probably stop reading fake news.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
74
Eagle Creek
100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering


"The adjustments being correlate almost perfectly with atmospheric CO2. NOAA is adjusting the data to match global warming theory. This is known as PBEM (Policy Based Evidence Making.)"
100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

I won't C and P the whole article, but it clearly shows we are being hosed.
goes with the jail sentence for that other global warming guy

All this clearly shows is that like your love for Rassmusen, you tend to seek out alternative websites from which to snatch your news, DB. Credibility, man........show some. Okay.

Looks like the NOAA has taken a page outta East Anglia U's playbook

Geez, Cap........consider the source. NOAA has nothing to gain by skewing data. Take a look at some of the other articles on that site - it's barely a step up from the National Enquirer, fps.

Another poster who, frightened by the real news, simply denies it.

Sleep, Wake..............sleep.
 

Wake

Electoral Member
Feb 17, 2017
112
0
16
All this clearly shows is that like your love for Rassmusen, you tend to seek out alternative websites from which to snatch your news, DB. Credibility, man........show some. Okay.



Geez, Cap........consider the source. NOAA has nothing to gain by skewing data. Take a look at some of the other articles on that site - it's barely a step up from the National Enquirer, fps.



Sleep, Wake..............sleep.
Anyone else notice that the true believers simply de3ny anything that doesn't fit their political stance?

Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ –

Climate Change: No, It

The Climate Catastrophe - A Spectroscopic Artifact

The world is too complicated to be understood even by the highest level scientists but we're being inundated by claims from high school students. Go home and get your spanking.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
74
Eagle Creek

I notice that you do not have the integrity to post accepted credible news sources for to bolster your claims.

The world is too complicated to be understood even by the highest level scientists but we're being inundated by claims from high school students. Go home and get your spanking.
Said by an obvious high school student.........or someone who never made it past grade 8.

Look, the climate is changing. PERIOD. I don't buy all the claims that it is man-made as there have been so many climatic events over the millennia brought on by numerous different events, but denying that changes are affecting the Earth is infantile.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering

That sure explains why it hit 17.5°C on Feb.23rd, here today.The NOAA tampered with our thermometers.

If Breitbart sez it's true, it must be true. Everything Else is FAKE NEWS!!

I notice that you do not have the integrity to post accepted credible news sources for to bolster your claims.

Said by an obvious high school student.........or someone who never made it past grade 8.

Look, the climate is changing. PERIOD. I don't buy all the claims that it is man-made as there have been so many climatic events over the millennia brought on by numerous different events, but denying that changes are affecting the Earth is infantile.

It's been warming for 15,000 years, steadily, which is why there isn't a kilometer or two of ice on top of your head.
 

Wake

Electoral Member
Feb 17, 2017
112
0
16
I notice that you do not have the integrity to post accepted credible news sources for to bolster your claims.

Said by an obvious high school student.........or someone who never made it past grade 8.

Look, the climate is changing. PERIOD. I don't buy all the claims that it is man-made as there have been so many climatic events over the millennia brought on by numerous different events, but denying that changes are affecting the Earth is infantile.
Apparently the scientists stating these things and their credentials isn't enough for you. You want it to come from NASA or NOAA.

The Climate Catastrophe - A Spectroscopic Artifact

The Four Known Scientific Ways Carbon Dioxide Cools Earth's Climate - Principia Scientific International

100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering

That sure explains why it hit 17.5°C on Feb.23rd, here today.The NOAA tampered with our thermometers.

If Breitbart sez it's true, it must be true. Everything Else is FAKE NEWS!!



It's been warming for 15,000 years, steadily, which is why there isn't a kilometer or two of ice on top of your head.
I was questioning before why people would believe that we had AGW when the warming started in 1886 and man didn't really start generating large amounts of CO2 until the later half of WW II.

If you look at a global CO2 chart you can see that the growth in CO2 since circa 1960 is essentially linear. But the global use of fossil fuels grew exponentially.

So you have to wonder what the hell is going on.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Apparently the scientists stating these things and their credentials isn't enough for you. You want it to come from NASA or NOAA.

The Climate Catastrophe - A Spectroscopic Artifact

The Four Known Scientific Ways Carbon Dioxide Cools Earth's Climate - Principia Scientific International


I was questioning before why people would believe that we had AGW when the warming started in 1886 and man didn't really start generating large amounts of CO2 until the later half of WW II.

If you look at a global CO2 chart you can see that the growth in CO2 since circa 1960 is essentially linear. But the global use of fossil fuels grew exponentially.

So you have to wonder what the hell is going on.

Maybe, the graph is an "alternate fact" graph.


Where did it come from, anyway?
 

Wake

Electoral Member
Feb 17, 2017
112
0
16
Maybe, the graph is an "alternate fact" graph.


Where did it come from, anyway?
I'm sure it is an "alternate fact" since it came from NOAA. And it would appear that you are an alternate fact as well since you couldn't so a simple search and find it. If you don't have the capacity to do that what makes you think that you have the capability of making one single comment that doesn't look like it came from a 12 year old?
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
I'm sure it is an "alternate fact" since it came from NOAA. And it would appear that you are an alternate fact as well since you couldn't so a simple search and find it. If you don't have the capacity to do that what makes you think that you have the capability of making one single comment that doesn't look like it came from a 12 year old?

Yet again, here's the Alt-Reich good 'ole boys in another idiotic anti-science circle jerk and here you are calling ME a twelve year old?

You are one of the most ignorant, idiotic human beings walking the planet.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Apparently the scientists stating these things and their credentials isn't enough for you. You want it to come from NASA or NOAA.

The Climate Catastrophe - A Spectroscopic Artifact

The Four Known Scientific Ways Carbon Dioxide Cools Earth's Climate - Principia Scientific International


I was questioning before why people would believe that we had AGW when the warming started in 1886 and man didn't really start generating large amounts of CO2 until the later half of WW II.

If you look at a global CO2 chart you can see that the growth in CO2 since circa 1960 is essentially linear. But the global use of fossil fuels grew exponentially.

So you have to wonder what the hell is going on.

Yes, I've seen pseudoscientific garbage like this before. The trick is to present an argument filled with mathematical formulas that the average person cannot understand and then claim that they support your position. Of course, such a technique ignores much stronger facts that would cut your position to shreds. It is an old technique known in scholarly circles as the "bullschitt baffles brains" argument.

As for global warming, more than simple CO2 production is responsible. A fact that is incredibly important, but is generally ignored is the elimination of much of the world's forested areas during the 20th Century. These were replaced by cropland which absorb a good deal less CO2 than woodland. Still another factor is the enormous increase in livestock in the last 150 years. Farm animals produce a great deal of methane, a much more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. And finally in 1900 the world population was only one-fifth of what it is now. That rapid increase has resulted in an enormous increase in the production of greenhouse gases of all types.