Quote: Originally Posted by Wake
One thing that stood out from your posting - you didn't volunteer any credentials and attempted to impune mine.
I'm a VFW from Vietnam and to see silly comments like yours does give me a giggle. You probably didn't even know that Canada had military troops in Vietnam. Were you of age you'd have been too busy hiding under your bed to protect the war.
Why do you repeat utter rubbish because you WANT to be right and not have to work at being smart?
Climate Change: No, It (external - login to view)
There is no climate change and there is no such thing as greenhouse gases. What is being passed about from hand to hand among a very small minority of leftist politicians that have simply bought off the management of places like NOAA that have chosen to tell us that everything they have is backed by "real scientists" such as the American Medical Association and the ladies auxiliary.
Consensus is not science and never has been. Quoting the laws of physics and then misrepresenting entire data sets and then discovering that almost the entire IPCC is politicians with no scientific training whatsoever should have rang a very loud bell.
If you are going to argue about this please give me some of your credentials. And I'm not speaking about any college degrees. I am a high school dropout that is entirely self taught. And yet I have worked for Lawrence Laboratories on improving the linear particle accelerator and programming poison gas detectors for those WMD that supposedly didn't exist. I automated the chemical analysis to discover HIV that was in the blood banking system and then to analyze DNA that brought the chief chemist a Nobel Prize. I even worked on the first base computer of the Pacific coast leg of the Internet that had 33 1/3rd times the capacity and speed as the best IBM supercomputer of the time. I could write accomplishments all day long so if you consider one paper written by one True Believer to be an education that won't pass. But if you have honestly studied physics and chemistry and have arguments of worth I'm more than ready to listen to them.
But the usual True Believer line is to claim a PhD in physics and then repeat a line of hogwash 6' deep.
NOAA and NASA have tampered with the data. How? By using almost unaltered ground based temperatures gathered in areas that had rapid and large urban growth. They did add corrections, but they purposely under corrected these because Obama wanted to say that he had hard science to back up his previous claims to the IPCC. The Satellite data gathered since about 1988 has shown records of world wide temperatures that do not even get close to matching the NOAA claims. And the disparity has not been broadly reported either by NASA or the media.
There is no such thing as a greenhouse gas. The only thing that is occurring is a blanketing effect that we have astronomical evidence that occurs up to the .1 Bar region on every planet and satellite with an atmosphere. And all these planets and satellites have wildly differing atmospheric compositions and base densities.
So you're welcome to place arguments but the usual "u dum" is only showing your own worth.