There is TRUTH, irrelevant of the fantasies that you perfer to ASSUME..
It is to ASSUME to KNOW ............What God is.............That is to be WRONG..
It is to ASSUME to KNOW ............What TRUTH is.............That is to be WRONG..
One can KNOW what is TRUE, but CANNOT KNOW what TRUTH is..
Even if you're right, you do not know that you are, so to say that you know "What God is" is still a LIE....
God is TRUTH..
{Or can we only find the truth in your god?}
You can ONLY find TRUTH and LIES(period)
Everyone is free to do whatever they choose.
This does not mean that whatever they choose is not unreasonable, illogical, backward, and just plain old stupid....Clearly there is “a way of things”, “ a TRUTH of things”, A RIGHT and a WRONG choice.. This is not to say a GOOD or EVIL choice.. In the grand scheme of things there cannot be GOOD or EVIL.. there can only be RIGHT and WRONG..Good and evil are merely a matter of opinion, determined ONLY relatively according to your chosen objectives.. Right and Wrong are a matter of FACT, determined by the objective truth relative to your chosen objective.. The truth is, some objectives are contrary to others, irrelevant of whether those objectives are yours alone or if one objective is yours and the other belongs to another..
......In any case, contrary objectives CANNOT be accomplished...
A House that stands against itself, CANNOT stand..
But I CAN..
I am NOT religious, the religious are LIKE this...
They believe to have FAITH.. is to believe as a TRUTH, that which CANNOT or at least IS NOT, KNOWN...
Thus FAITH in the religious view is exactly the same as PRESUMPUOUSNESS..
My view is precisely the exact opposite.. ANTI-PRESUMPUOUSNESS..
To assume NOTHING, scientific minded people are in comparison to me, as PRESUMPUOUS and dogmatic as the religious..
It is YOU are are the PRESUMPUOUS dogmatic religious fundamentalist..
I am NOT religious, the religious are LIKE this...
They believe that righteousness is MORALITY, and that one is OBLIGATED to act morally in order to earn deservingness in the eyes of an invisible being that does NOT reveal Himself, and is NOT REAL in any natural sense....
My view is precisely the exact opposite.. righteousness is to be CORRECT, to be empowered to CORRECTLY recognize and realize the FACTS of LIFE as they truly are.. and further I recognize that in the grand scheme of things any concept of MORALITY is UTTERLY FALSE, and an utter illusion..
I am NOT religious, the religious are LIKE this...
They believe that one should blindly except the irrelevant (opinions) interpretations of religious texts, and believe them as the ABSOLUTE authority of an UNREAL invisible being..
My view is precisely the exact opposite.. I believe ONLY what I can realize as CLEALY and OBSERVABLY TRUE for myself, and reject ALL religious dogma.. If what I realize is similar to what is written in books or stated by others, is only indicating that THEY TO have realized what is CLEALY and OBSERVABLY TRUE...
{And if I seek and I find there is no god? or that god is female, or a multiple personality like the Hindu gods, or the Great Mystery of the aboriginal people? Or can we only find the truth in your god?}
Freedom of religion is BULL ****..
Terrorists have as much right to fly airplanes into buildings for the sake of being obedient to their God, as Christians have to “Love their their neighbors” for the sake of being obedient to their God.
Who shall dictate what other peoples Gods are allowed to require of their followers?
And for that matter, religion or not, what standard shall one inflict on another. Upon what foundation ought that standard be based...