Calvinism: the rational Christianity

Niflmir
Avatar
#1
I always thought that the Calvinists drew Christianity to its logical conclusion: unconditional election.

The basic idea being, God who is omnipotent and omniscient created you. Now God knew before hand that He would create you, and knew before hand whether you would be sent to heaven or not. Therefore, salvation is God's and only God's choice: it has absolutely nothing to do with an individual's faith or merit.

To me, this was always the logical conclusion of an omnipotent and omniscient creator who also created a heaven and a hell.
 
TenPenny
#2
There's a certain logic to that idea.
 
Cliffy
Avatar
#3
It would even make sense if the literal interpretation of the biblical god, heaven and hell existed.
 
Niflmir
Avatar
#4
I always thought it logical. But it certainly created lots of problems for the evangelists, who believed in the need to proclaim the goodness of God so that individuals could be saved and for the Catholics who believed that a person must confess to a priest (and presumably tithe) in order to achieve salvation. Indeed, it seemed to create problems for everyone except the Calvinists and I believe the Jehovah's Witnesses.
 
Spade
Avatar
#5
Jung on why people believe life is forever.

 
Goober
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by NiflmirView Post

I always thought that the Calvinists drew Christianity to its logical conclusion: unconditional election.

The basic idea being, God who is omnipotent and omniscient created you. Now God knew before hand that He would create you, and knew before hand whether you would be sent to heaven or not. Therefore, salvation is God's and only God's choice: it has absolutely nothing to do with an individual's faith or merit.

To me, this was always the logical conclusion of an omnipotent and omniscient creator who also created a heaven and a hell.

And others, many others would disgree -
 
Spade
#7
My gawd, I`m seeing double. Definitely gawd`s intention.
 
Goober
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by SpadeView Post

My gawd, I`m seeing double. Definitely gawd`s intention.

Tad early to be sippin on that fine scotch eh.
 
Spade
Avatar
#9
There indeed is logic to it.
If gawd knew my future from the beginning, then there is no free will.
If gawd didn`t, she is not all knowing.
If she is not all knowing, she is not gawd.
 
Goober
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by SpadeView Post

There indeed is logic to it.
If gawd knew my future from the beginning, then there is no free will.
If gawd didn`t, she is not all knowing.
If she is not all knowing, she is not gawd.

But there is free will and God knows.
 
TenPenny
Avatar
+1
#11  Top Rated Post
If there is free will, God can only know what has happened, not what will be in the future.
 
Goober
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

If there is free will, God can only know what has happened, not what will be in the future.

How can you arrive at that?
 
TenPenny
Avatar
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

How can you arrive at that?

If there is free will, I am free to determine what happens next.
Since what happens next has not happened, and is under my control, God cannot know what will happen.

If God knows what will happen next, then it cannot be up to me to make a decision, therefore there could be no free will.
 
IdRatherBeSkiing
Avatar
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

If there is free will, I am free to determine what happens next.
Since what happens next has not happened, and is under my control, God cannot know what will happen.

If God knows what will happen next, then it cannot be up to me to make a decision, therefore there could be no free will.

Well, God's psycic abilities may be stronger than the average joe and may be aware of the free choice you have yet to make. It's only not free will if God tries to change the outcome.
 
Goober
Avatar
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

If there is free will, I am free to determine what happens next.
Since what happens next has not happened, and is under my control, God cannot know what will happen.

If God knows what will happen next, then it cannot be up to me to make a decision, therefore there could be no free will.

How do you know that God does not know what decision you will make. God can also send signs to inform a person. That does not interfere with free will.
 
TenPenny
Avatar
#16
If God knows what is going to happen, then the future must be pre-ordained (even if God is psychic).

Therefore, free will is an illusion.
 
Niflmir
Avatar
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

If there is free will, I am free to determine what happens next.
Since what happens next has not happened, and is under my control, God cannot know what will happen.

If God knows what will happen next, then it cannot be up to me to make a decision, therefore there could be no free will.

The apologetic reply to the problem of God's omniscience and free will is to point out that it is still free will if it what you wanted to do anyways. Of course that is a topic for a whole other thread, unless you really think Unconditional Election hinges on free will.

As I see it, all that matters for the purpose of Unconditional Election is God's Omniscience and creationism (the one aspect of omnipotence), since, knowing what you would do with free will (whether you have it or not) She could have chosen not to create you.
 
Nuggler
Avatar
#18
.......--


Some (above) would disagree. I spent years researching........(.well, a few minutes)...........this and find it is full to the brim of the same bul.............well, you read it.
 
darkbeaver
Avatar
#19
Gods will by definition is not appreciable or approachable by mans logic or a monkeys. The rule is ,"god moves in mysterious ways". That I think means understanding is exclusive of logic, as marriage is exclusive of screwdrivers. Only god knows if that makes sense.
 
TenPenny
Avatar
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by NiflmirView Post

The apologetic reply to the problem of God's omniscience and free will is to point out that it is still free will if it what you wanted to do anyways.

If what you 'wanted' to do was always what God wanted you to do, then it wouldn't be free will.
 
Nuggler
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaverView Post

Gods will by definition is not appreciable or approachable by mans logic or a monkeys. The rule is ,"god moves in mysterious ways". That I think means understanding is exclusive of logic, as marriage is exclusive of screwdrivers. Only god knows if that makes sense.


A monkey wouldn't know??
 
Cliffy
Avatar
#22
Why would god create a creature whose every thought and action it already knew? What would be the point? Why create heaven and hell when you already know who will end up where? This is such a silly notion that only a human could have thought it up. There is no logic in belief. As Freud said, you either know something because it is logical or you don't. Belief is illogical because it is based on something you can have no way of proving by any means. Giving god human traits only proves Mark Twain's assumption that men created god in their own image.
 
Niflmir
Avatar
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

Why would god create a creature whose every thought and action it already knew? What would be the point? Why create heaven and hell when you already know who will end up where? This is such a silly notion that only a human could have thought it up. There is no logic in belief. As Freud said, you either know something because it is logical or you don't. Belief is illogical because it is based on something you can have no way of proving by any means. Giving god human traits only proves Mark Twain's assumption that men created god in their own image.

I suppose one could argue that God created humanity for the same reason we create works of art. After all, I know exactly what my creations are going to do (ok not always, because some of my "creations" contain bugs), and they certainly don't think. Yet, we still have the need to create these static things. A related question might be why, if we knew that we would throw the painting in the garbage (hell) why would we bother painting it?
 
darkbeaver
Avatar
+1
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by NugglerView Post

A monkey wouldn't know??

We will ask Goober, he has relatives.
 
IdRatherBeSkiing
Avatar
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

If God knows what is going to happen, then the future must be pre-ordained (even if God is psychic).

Therefore, free will is an illusion.

Leaving God out of the equation, if somebody did find a way to view the future, this would disprove freewill?

And if there is free will, there is absolutely nobody who can claim any psychic abilities?

Interesting concept. Not sure I have an anwer.
 
Cliffy
Avatar
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by NiflmirView Post

I suppose one could argue that God created humanity for the same reason we create works of art. After all, I know exactly what my creations are going to do (ok not always, because some of my "creations" contain bugs), and they certainly don't think. Yet, we still have the need to create these static things. A related question might be why, if we knew that we would throw the painting in the garbage (hell) why would we bother painting it?

Why create an entire Universe and then put one static being on one insignificant spec of dust in some obscure part of it? What you are saying gives god human characteristics. It is beyond arrogant to think that we, as finite beings, can begin to fathom the infinite. We are nothing more than the Who that Horton hears. In our arrogance we have become a parody of ourselves. I'm not saying that a creator doesn't exist, but the one being discussed is illogical.
 
darkbeaver
Avatar
#27
We are not separate from nature therefore we cannot be separate from god. Can the stomach which supposedly has no will of its own overcome the will of the dieter? God wants us to use god given free will to deny free will?
Last edited by darkbeaver; Dec 12th, 2011 at 03:48 PM..
 
TenPenny
Avatar
+1
#28
Quote: Originally Posted by IdRatherBeSkiingView Post

Leaving God out of the equation, if somebody did find a way to view the future, this would disprove freewill?

And if there is free will, there is absolutely nobody who can claim any psychic abilities?

Interesting concept. Not sure I have an anwer.

If one can view the future, then an argument could be made that there is no free will, since the future is known, and the ability to make decisions that change the future is eliminated.
 
Goober
Avatar
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

If one can view the future, then an argument could be made that there is no free will, since the future is known, and the ability to make decisions that change the future is eliminated.

God handed Job over to the Devil. His Free Will and beliefs carried him thru the turmoil. Some will see this as God and the Devil playing with a man. I do not.



--

--
 
In Between Man
Avatar
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by NiflmirView Post

I always thought that the Calvinists drew Christianity to its logical conclusion: unconditional election.

The basic idea being, God who is omnipotent and omniscient created you. Now God knew before hand that He would create you, and knew before hand whether you would be sent to heaven or not. Therefore, salvation is God's and only God's choice: it has absolutely nothing to do with an individual's faith or merit.

To me, this was always the logical conclusion of an omnipotent and omniscient creator who also created a heaven and a hell.

Although Calvinism is a legitimate denomination because it affirms the essential doctrines (denominations exist because of disputes over minor, less important issues) unconditional election is false because it contradicts the bible and defies logic. Unconditional election would say that God is the one who solely chooses who is saved and who is not. However, there are too many places in scripture that show that man must play a part in his salvation. Peter preached on Pentecost that those present must "save themselves". (Acts 2:40) Further, the Lord said that only those who "do" the will of the Father will see the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 7:21) The bible teaches that we are going to be judged by our "works" on the last day. (2 Corinthians 5:10, John 12:48, Ecclesiastes 12:13-14) If this unconditional election were true, there would not need to be a judgment, for God has already decided.

Further, God said that it's his will that not one person should perish. (Matthew 18:14) He didn't say that is was his will that some be saved and some perish. Then why do some people go to hell? Simple. Because we have complete free will. God said that he sets before life or death, blessing or curse. Then he gives you an inside tip, CHOOSE life because it's better than death. (Deuteronomy 30:19)

Further, if God solely decided who would be saved and who would perish when he was planning creation, then why did he say that he knocks on the doors of the hearts of men? (Revelation 3:20) What would be the point of trying to woo people to him if he already decided who would be saved and who would perish?

Finally, this doctrine makes God unjust because he would be condemning some having never given them a chance to serve him, even if they desired to do so; and even forcing his will upon people by saving them when they may not want to be saved in the first place.

Ultimately, I think your approach is wrong. Read the bible and learn what the fundamentals are first, then choose a denomination. Even then you don't necessarily have to choose a denomination at all. There are many non-denominational churches around. They're the ones that usually have names like "New Life Christian Centre" or "Toronto Full Gospel Church" or "Christian Fellowship Centre".

Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

If there is free will, I am free to determine what happens next.
Since what happens next has not happened, and is under my control, God cannot know what will happen.

If God knows what will happen next, then it cannot be up to me to make a decision, therefore there could be no free will.

By analogy, knowing what will happen does not mean that we are preventing or causing that thing to happen. If I put a bowl of ice cream and a bowl of cauliflower in front of a child, I know for a fact which one is chosen - the ice cream. My knowing it ahead of time does not restrict the child from making a free choice when the time comes. The child is free to make a choice and knowing the choice has no effect upon him or her when they make it.

Logically, God knowing what we are going to do does not mean that we can't do something else. It means that God simply knows what we have chosen to do ahead of time. Our freedom is not restricted by God's foreknowledge; our freedom is simply realized ahead of time by God.

No matter what choice we freely make, it can be known by God, and his knowing it doesn't mean we aren't making a free choice. God's knowledge is necessarily complete and exhaustive because that is his nature, to know all things. In fact, since he has eternally known what all our free choices will be, he has ordained history to come to the conclusion that he wishes INCLUDING AND INCORPORATING OUR CHOICES into His divine plan.
Last edited by In Between Man; Dec 17th, 2011 at 08:29 PM..
 

Similar Threads

15
The human rational soul.
by Deacon Raymond | Jun 3rd, 2008
38
Karma - A rational approach
by gc | May 3rd, 2007
42
Emotions or rational thinking?
by Vereya | Feb 22nd, 2007
8
The rational soul
by Socrates the Greek | Apr 30th, 2006
7
Iran/US rational actors?
by Said1 | Apr 11th, 2006
no new posts