Is the Lobbyist's "Consideration" to your PoliticalParty's President & you, Adequate?
I'd like to know how much information and what portion of the "consideration" the federal constituents in Quebec whose members of parliament (MPs) are "Independent" are getting from the traditional parties, or, the lobbyist who is responsible for the dibursements of the "considerations", or, from other sources, for "going along with" the deprivation of the information that is embodied in "The Australian Question" as it pertains to Canadians, in general, and to the constituents in Quebec, in particular.
In particular, I'm trying to track-down the more comprehensive, or, "expanded" version of the criteria (as opposed to the limited version of the criteria) that is in the aforementioned "Question" as the amount of "consideration" that a constituent obtains by way of "The Question" is comenserate with how much the MPs knows (by way of his party's presidents contact with the responsible lobbyist) and are willing to share with his constituents.
Similarly, but inversely, "The Australian Question" states that the basis for the compensation that is in "The Question" is related to how much a constituent knows about the alternatives to paying his/her portion of the aforementioned compensation.
Finally, I would ask the constituents of Quebec and the others who are interested in leaving the Canadian confederation, how much their dissatisfaction with their amount of the "consideration" is contributing to their desire to leave Canada and, thereby, would also enable them to avoid paying "their" portion of the aforementioned compensation?
I'd like to know how much information and what portion of the "consideration" the federal constituents in Quebec whose members of parliament (MPs) are "Independent" are getting from the traditional parties, or, the lobbyist who is responsible for the dibursements of the "considerations", or, from other sources, for "going along with" the deprivation of the information that is embodied in "The Australian Question" as it pertains to Canadians, in general, and to the constituents in Quebec, in particular.
In particular, I'm trying to track-down the more comprehensive, or, "expanded" version of the criteria (as opposed to the limited version of the criteria) that is in the aforementioned "Question" as the amount of "consideration" that a constituent obtains by way of "The Question" is comenserate with how much the MPs knows (by way of his party's presidents contact with the responsible lobbyist) and are willing to share with his constituents.
Similarly, but inversely, "The Australian Question" states that the basis for the compensation that is in "The Question" is related to how much a constituent knows about the alternatives to paying his/her portion of the aforementioned compensation.
Finally, I would ask the constituents of Quebec and the others who are interested in leaving the Canadian confederation, how much their dissatisfaction with their amount of the "consideration" is contributing to their desire to leave Canada and, thereby, would also enable them to avoid paying "their" portion of the aforementioned compensation?
