Can someone provide one legal reason how the Canadian government can refuse to seek Omar Khadr's repatriation?
The Federal Court of Canada and the Court of Appeals had already concluded that the government has the obligation to seek his repatriation. Although the Supreme Court has stopped short from asking that, it agreed that Khadr's rights have been violated.
Us, laymen, can argue about what rights he waived, and how guilty he is, etc... etc... but at the end of the day, it's been concluded by the judicial branch that his rights have indeed been denied.
What legal reasoning does our government have to refuse to do what's right? Is the government blatantly violating the Charter just because they can?
Canada Does Not Guarantee Canadian Rights and Freedoms | Blables.com
The Federal Court of Canada and the Court of Appeals had already concluded that the government has the obligation to seek his repatriation. Although the Supreme Court has stopped short from asking that, it agreed that Khadr's rights have been violated.
Us, laymen, can argue about what rights he waived, and how guilty he is, etc... etc... but at the end of the day, it's been concluded by the judicial branch that his rights have indeed been denied.
What legal reasoning does our government have to refuse to do what's right? Is the government blatantly violating the Charter just because they can?
Canada Does Not Guarantee Canadian Rights and Freedoms | Blables.com