Harper: Worst economic steward in Canada's history?

elevennevele

Electoral Member
Mar 13, 2006
787
11
18
Canada
or should we be fair and just call it a train wreck in progress?

It is one thing to be bad at something. It's another thing to be really bad at something.



Change in Productivity While in Office

Diefendaker 9.7%
Pearson 18.6%
Trudeau(1) 30.4%
Clark 0.4%
Trudeau(2) 11.8%
Mulroney 6.4%
Chretien 18.3%
Martin 4.1%
Harper -0.6%

Source: CCPA calculations from Statistics Canada quarterly data


You can download the report here:

http://www.policyalternatives.ca/do...ubs/2008/Canadas_Productivity_Performance.pdf


Source: CCPA calculations from Statistics Canada quarterly data.
Prior to 1981, quarterly start and end productivity levels are interpolated from annual averages
(quarterly figures are available only for 1981–2008).
1. Diefenbaker was elected in 1957, but the productivity series used in this table commenced only in 1961. 2. Most recent data available.
 

elevennevele

Electoral Member
Mar 13, 2006
787
11
18
Canada
Under Harper we have the highest number of job losses since Brian Mulroney.



http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080808.wjobs0808/BNStory/Business/home

Canada posts biggest job loss in 17 years

JOHN PARTRIDGE

Globe and Mail Update

August 8, 2008 at 8:40 AM EDT

The Canadian economy lost 55,200 jobs in July, when economists had forecast an increase, but the unemployment rate shrank to 6.1 per cent, Statistics Canada said Friday.

The employment figures showed the biggest loss in jobs since February 1991, when 57,000 disappeared as recession gripped Canada. The bulk of the July losses – 48,000 – came from part-time positions, while the hardest hit sectors were manufacturing, business, building and other support services, and educational services.

In fact, the only significant gains came in accommodation and food services, which added a combined 22,000 jobs during the month, Statscan said.

While private sector employers shed 95,300 jobs, the public sector added 29,500, and the ranks of the self-employed rose by 10,600, the agency said.

“Statistics Canada seems to have caught up with what we've been reading in the newspapers for months, that a lot of plants were closing and a lot of jobs were being shed,” CIBC World Markets economist Avery Shenfeld said. “There were particularly heavy losses in the private sector, which is, again, a worrisome sign.”
 

elevennevele

Electoral Member
Mar 13, 2006
787
11
18
Canada
Under Harper we've already flirted with deficit spending after blowing billions and billions of dollars of surplus monies he inherited from the previous government. Blew it all in two years.



http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080725.wdeficit0725/BNStory/Business/home


Fiscal update set for October

Reuters

July 25, 2008 at 1:39 PM EDT

OTTAWA — Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty told reporters Friday that the government plans to present its fiscal update in October.

“We're beginning to work on the fall fiscal update,” he said. We are on track and we usually do the fiscal update in October.”

The update is normally a snapshot of the government's financial position, but if the October statement contains new fiscal measures, it would be a confidence motion, giving opposition parties in the House of Commons an opportunity to bring down the minority Conservatives.

On Friday, the government said it posted a deficit of $517-million for April and May, the first two months of the fiscal year, as income from corporate and sales taxes fell sharply.

That compares with a surplus of $2.78-billion in the same two months of 2007.

From what I've heard, the most government spending in the timeframe of Harper's term in office has also occurred with this government. These guys are the biggest spenders of taxpayers monies. They spend our taxpayers monies like drunken sailors.

And get this, since the Adscam fiasco the advertising budget for the government has DOUBLED under Harper. For what? His propoganda mailers on the taxpayers dime? Those things you get in the mail disguised to be info brochures. Instead they are more like promos for Harper's policies in an attempt to skirt the rules of government mailers on the taxpayers dime. No wonder Elections Canada has it out for them. Headed by a person they appointed. How unbiased is that condemnation?


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080728.wads29/BNStory/National/home



Ad budget doubles under Harper

DANIEL LEBLANC

From Tuesday's Globe and Mail

July 28, 2008 at 7:46 PM EDT

OTTAWA — Ottawa's advertising budget doubled to more than $80-million in the first full year of the Harper government, the first rise in marketing spending since the start of the sponsorship scandal in 2002, according to an unreleased federal report.

The report on advertising spending in 2006-2007 has been ready for weeks, but Public Works had yet to make it public last night. A copy was provided to The Globe and Mail in answer to questions on its content.

The report shows Ottawa's advertising spending came in at $87-million in the 2006-2007 fiscal year. Only one year earlier, the government's total advertising purchases were just $41-million.

The spending quickly jumped as the government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper launched advertising campaigns on issues such as health and military recruitment, and promoted the 2006 census.

The Liberals said the increased spending on advertising shows the Conservative government is misguided in its priorities, and should stop using advertising to improve its image in the eyes of Canadians.

“Especially at a time when jobs are being lost and the economy is in difficulties, the idea that the government should go out and double its advertising budget to prove to Canadians it's doing a good job is about the lowest priority you could imagine,” said Liberal MP John McCallum.




Look at the date. The irresponsibilty with taxpayer's monies were pointed out well in advance of all the concerns now being hammered regarding the economy. Harper was obtuse to such concerns. Others seem to have been able to point out wastefulness and economic concerns potentially down the road.

Harper on the other hand had his government too busy fighting with Ontario. Telling the world it wasn't a place to invest in. These guys who call themselves Conservatives are a joke.
 

elevennevele

Electoral Member
Mar 13, 2006
787
11
18
Canada
This is also a government that blows a 1.3 billion budget on tanks that won't even be ready for the date Harper says he now will 'cut and run' regarding the mission in Afghanistan. I 've heard that it might even be double that to get this used tanks to even be usable.

This government made military purchases on no bid contracts, and if you look at who was helping to decide on such purchases there is a total conflict of interest. People who worked for the suppliers now acting on the buy side.

1.3 billion in tanks that will probably never get used for anything. Meanwhile Harper is cancelling contracts for ships we need to patrol the waters up north. Something that would actually be useful to us. Again on those being contracts without any competitive bids.




http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=ec125be8-f178-4cc2-9f10-250d641ab073



DND buying tanks to strip down for parts
David Pugliese , Canwest News Service

Just months after the Defence Department claimed it had enough spare parts for its Leopard tanks, military officials are buying surplus armored vehicles to strip down for components so Canadian tanks can keep operating in Afghanistan.

The latest issue with the Leopard tanks has one critic of the $1.3-billion program dubbing the used armored vehicles as "land lemons" and warning the project could end up like the military's troubled purchase of used submarines.

The Harper government announced the purchase of 100 used Leopard 2 tanks from the Netherlands in April 2007 as well as the loan of another 20 tanks from Germany for use in Afghanistan.
A Leopard tank fires in the desert of Zhari district as part of a test by Canadian soldiers last December. The Harper government announced the purchase of 100 of the used tanks from the Netherlands in last April.
A Leopard tank fires in the desert of Zhari district as part of a test by Canadian soldiers last December. The Harper government announced the purchase of 100 of the used tanks from the Netherlands in last April.

Canwest News Service


http://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/469555



Plows for clearing roadside bombs won't fit Canada's Leopard 2 tanks


Jul 30, 2008 04:30 AM
Comments on this story (4)
Allan Woods
OTTAWA BUREAU

OTTAWA–A key piece of equipment used by Canadian soldiers to clear roadside bombs in Afghanistan won't work on a new fleet of tanks the military purchased last year, government documents show.

The mine plow is one of the tools Canadians rely on to counter the threat of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and land mines that have been responsible for many of the 88 Canadian soldiers killed so far in the country. The plow is mounted on the front of a tank and digs into the soil to lift out hidden bombs and push them out of the tank's path.

They have been used on the current fleet of 30-year-old Leopard 1 tanks that were sent to Kandahar in 2006. But the age and condition of the tanks left them prone to overheating and breaking down in Afghanistan's hot, rocky and dusty conditions.

This is a government of WASTE. They are not economic stewards. The Harper government is an economic train wreck.

Sure Harper. Go buy Canada another UFO site. Pander to whatever will get you votes on the backs of Canadians. Vote anybody but Harper.


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080905.welectiontax0905/BNStory/National/home



UFO memorials and other Tory ‘splurges'

Canadian Press

September 5, 2008 at 12:28 PM EDT

OTTAWA — The Canadian Taxpayers Federation says the Harper government's pre-election spending is out of this world.

The group says the Conservatives have doled out a whopping $8.8-billion since June — including a $2,000 grant to commemorate a UFO sighting.

Federation director John Williamson says there have been almost 300 pre-election commitments, adding up to about $94-million a day, or almost $4-million every hour.

Mr. Williamson says the spending binge is exactly the kind of pre-election splurge Prime Minister Stephen Harper criticized the Liberals for in the run-up to the 2006 federal election.

Among the big-ticket Tory commitments: $1.1-billion for a so-called “road map for linguistic duality;” $350,000 for an ice cream company in Prince Edward Island; and $297,000 for a ski club in Newfoundland.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Well elevennevele, you make a pretty good case. Walter would have something to contribute if he could find some place to cut and paste the counter-punch from. Instead he opines with an asshole comment, making the comparison of opinions and assholes truly punny :D

Nice work ;)
 

Unforgiven

Force majeure
May 28, 2007
6,770
137
63
Well thank goodness they cleaned up government coruption, controlled spending and didn't tell lies.

heh heh heh heh oh **** what a world!
 

Socrates the Greek

I Remember them....
Apr 15, 2006
4,968
36
48
Under Harper we have the highest number of job losses since Brian Mulroney.

Just imagine in 2 ½ years the Conservatives have put employment as a distant priority, while Harper spend the first year as a chicken Little PM DOING PHOTO UPS WITH THE MILITARY……………….
The doe the Conservatives squandered on the military could have gone to provide more jobs and also help the export industry who suffered immensely because of the high Canadian dollar. In 2 ½ years Harper and his bunch put the boot to 400.000 jobs this far, I can not imagine the Conservatives on a 4 year term we would loose over one million jobs and I also can not imagine the amount of deficit they are capable of loading on to the Canadian tax payers backs………………..
 

Socrates the Greek

I Remember them....
Apr 15, 2006
4,968
36
48
Your source doesn't have an anus.


Hey Walter he is telling the truth, and the truth is Staring at you, come on speak to the truth instead of the anus philosophy………………..That is an attitude of a snob……I am sure you are not a snob……….;-)
 

Risus

Genius
May 24, 2006
5,373
25
38
Toronto
Hey Walter he is telling the truth, and the truth is Staring at you, come on speak to the truth instead of the anus philosophy………………..That is an attitude of a snob……I am sure you are not a snob……….;-)
Based on what?? The figures are all skewed.
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
54
Oshawa
Harper's unnerving confidence TheStar.com - Federal Election - Harper's unnerving confidence
September 17, 2008
Thomas Walkom

Canadians will need more than a steady hand on the tiller to weather the financial crisis erupting in the United States.
We'll need a government that is not theologically enslaved to free-market orthodoxy, one that has the imagination to navigate economic waters that are largely uncharted.
I say "largely" because what is happening in the U.S. – the bankruptcy of one large investment bank, the shotgun sale of another and travails of yet a third financial giant – is not unprecedented.
It's called a run on the banks and it happened in 1929. Then, the failing banks were retail deposit-taking institutions that lent out more than they took in. Today, they are wholesale investment giants engaged in a similar process.
It is a legalized kiting scheme that works as long as no one calls anyone else's bluff. But once someone does, and all those with money in the scheme demand repayment, the edifice collapses.
The result, as those of my parents' generation found in the 1930s, is devastating. Credit lubricates the economy; when it dries up, everything seizes.
Business owners who are no longer able to negotiate loans lay off workers; people lose their homes. Unemployment begets unemployment.
Unchecked, a credit crisis can lead not to recession but to a full-blown worldwide depression.
What is different about this financial crunch is that it comes on top of two others. The first is an energy crisis that has sent gasoline prices skyrocketing and driven oil-dependent firms, like airlines, out of business.
The second, related, crisis is the currency upheaval that has pushed the value of the American dollar down and that of oil-producing countries, like Canada, up. It's the currency crisis that has shuttered factories throughout southern Ontario, from Oshawa to Welland to Windsor.
Up to now, Canada has been lucky. The money Ontarians lose in manufacturing has been made up for by that which Alberta and other resource-rich provinces pull in from soaring commodity prices. Money has been recycled, jobs created and the unemployment rate kept down.
When Prime Minister Stephen Harper says the fundamentals are sound, what he really means is that we're fortunate enough to own raw materials that well-heeled foreigners want to buy.
But now, as the financial crisis spreads, those foreigners aren't quite as well-heeled. The price of oil is falling – not good news for the high-cost Alberta tar sands and those firms that have been servicing them. Indeed, Canadians now face the worst of worlds: stubbornly high retail gas prices (bad for consumers); declining wholesale oil prices (bad for Alberta) and a dollar that, while falling against Asian and European currencies, is still high relative to its American counterpart (bad for Ontario).
All of these troubles will pale, however, if the world financial crisis escalates. The Bank of Canada, the country's central bank, is wisely pumping money into the system. But we won't be able to insulate ourselves entirely from a serious international credit crunch.
The best we could hope for is a government willing to use the levers of the state (including, but not limited to, deficit financing) to shelter Canadians from the destructive savagery of capitalism's dark side.
"If we were going to have some kind of big crash or recession, we probably would have had it by now," Harper said on Monday.
Would that he were correct. Unfortunately, he is not. The danger is in the future. And the Conservative leader's blithe approach to that danger is singularly unnerving.

http://www.thestar.com/FederalElection/article/500414
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Based on what?? The figures are all skewed.

Do you troll Socrates all over this forum, or is it just in the political threads?

What's your problem with Stats Canada? They're known around the world as a first rate organization. You think that the Government was skewing the reports when they released the news briefs themselves? Flaherty was fluffing the figures to look worse!?

I know the truth can hurt, but suck it up and ask for better, if you're a dedicated Conservative supporter...
 

elevennevele

Electoral Member
Mar 13, 2006
787
11
18
Canada
Under Harper leadership, Canada is slated for 'the second weakest growth among the major industrialized countries'. So I guess that means that the first 'worst time' was Harpers first year? The second worst being Harper's second year?

Harper claims to be the best leadership for this country's economy, but based on the factual economic events that have surfaced regarding this governments economic stewardship in their time of office, I see this boost by Harper as nothing but a false claim. What seems to be apparent is that the rhetoric does not match the reality of the numbers, or the reality of what has been happening with the economic landscape of this country.

It is a sad and dangerous joke to the welfare of this country and 'us' as Canadians, as Harper is spinning his economic stewardship all the way to the vote booth with an uninformed electorate who is pounded 24/7 with propaganda paid for by Colpy's donations in addition to the dirty tricks used to skirt the intention of our election laws with regards to financing an election campaign.




http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/subscriber/columnists/top3/story/4227060p-4865206c.html

Last month, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development reported that Canada is slated for the second weakest economic growth among the major industrialized countries -- the worst performance since the last time the Conservatives were in office.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.oecd.org/pages/0,3417,en_36734052_36734103_1_1_1_1_1,00.html


OECD brings together the governments of
countries committed to democracy and the
market economy
from around the world to:
• Support sustainable economic growth
• Boost employment
• Raise living standards
• Maintain financial stability
• Assist other countries' economic development
• Contribute to growth in world trade
OECD also shares expertise and exchanges
views with more than 100 other countries
and economies
, from Brazil, China, and Russia
to the least developed countries in Africa.

Monitoring, analysing and forecasting
For more than 40 years, OECD has been one of the world's largest and most reliable sources of comparable statistics, and economic and social data. As well as collecting data, OECD monitors trends, analyses and forecasts economic developments and researches social changes or evolving patterns in trade, environment, agriculture, technology, taxation and more.

The Organisation provides a setting where governments compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and coordinate domestic and international policies.