Совет при Президенте Ð*Ф / Проблемы жителей Крыма
Problems of Crimean residents
Due to the numerous references media review "Problems of Crimean residents" as an official document of the Presidential Council on Civil Society and Human Rights, expressing the assessment of the Crimean referendum Council, explains that he is not.
One of its authors, Member of the Board Yevgeny Bobrov, from 16 to 18 April 2014 made a private visit to the Crimea, the result of which was a review of the problems of the local people in various fields. Review text was April 22, 2014 published Bobrov in the materials of the Standing Committee on migration policy and protection of human rights in the sphere of international relations, the chairman of which he is, in his personal blog on the Council website.
The review tezisno presents some aspects of the problems faced by the inhabitants of the Crimea in the process of integration of the new Russian Federation in the economic, financial, credit and legal system of the country. Information is divided by subject "nationality", "registration (registration)", "asylum", "registration of property rights", "food and products", "educational institutions", "international relations", "religion and the Church," "resonance murder, detention and abduction of citizens, "the banking system. pensions and social benefits, "" judicial system "," media "," business ", the land and the position of the rural population", "tourism", "referendum". This review does not contain political assessments, the results of the official surveys, examinations or assessments. It presents only personal observations and opinions of the authors. In particular, speaking about the Crimean referendum, the review authors transmit only value judgments of his interlocutors, not appreciating their objectivity and accuracy.
The Council requests the media representatives did not distort the content of this review.
May 7, 2014
This document is a member of the Board of EA Bobrov, the head of the network "Migration and Law" HRC "Memorial" SA Gannushkina and lawyer Tseytlina OP Network as a result of visiting the cities of Sevastopol and Simferopol in the period from 15 to 18 April 2014, meetings with officials of the state authorities, clergy, journalists, public figures, lawyers, human rights activists and citizens. Citizenship According to Part. 1, Art. 4 of the Federal Constitutional Law of March 21, 2014 N 6-FKZ "On the adoption of the Russian Federation Republic of Crimea and the formation of the Russian Federation subjects of the new Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol" (hereinafter - the Law) by citizens of the Russian Federation recognized as citizens of Ukraine and stateless persons permanently residing in the Crimea on March 18, 2014, with the exception of persons who, within one month after this date they declare their desire to maintain their existing and their minor children of another nationality or remain stateless (refuse . recognition of the citizens of the Russian Federation) There were the following problems: 1) Although the information on the FMS website to confirm the stay is not only information about the place of registration zhitelstva1 face problems in the issuance of passports to many residents of the Crimea - Ukrainian citizens, foreign citizens and persons without citizenship, permanently living in the Crimea, but have no residence registration. The divisions FMS of Russia in Simferopol and Sevastopol, there is no information on the possibility of this category acquire citizenship of the Russian Federation. 2) Availability of premises in the property even in the absence of registration it is the basis of registration of Russian citizenship (decision on documentation was adopted in each case, taking into account the specific circumstances ). 3) Submission of preserving Ukrainian citizenship, and as a result of non-recognition of a citizen of the Russian Federation has become really possible only with the April 1, 2014 in Simferopol was originally only one regional office to function accepting applications for renunciation of citizenship of the Russian Federation, and only 3 branches in all the Crimea (Simferopol, Belogorsk, Bakhchisarai) is now open 8 branches (Yalta, Evpatoria, Saki, Feodosia, Djankov, Simferopol, Sevastopol, Bakhchisarai), but this was not enough, as a result of citizens actually were prevented in time to file such a statement. Many citizens in the absence of objective, complete and accurate information about the future position of "non-citizens" of Russia in the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol is still not able to correctly assess the situation, and therefore also failed within the prescribed period to April 18, 2014 take a fundamental decision for themselves to acquire Russian citizenship, or the preservation of Ukrainian citizenship, which entails the rejection of recognition of Russian citizens. 4) Many state employees threatened with dismissal, while maintaining their Ukrainian citizenship, and as a result of non-recognition of Russian citizenship (although related to the nationality restrictions in the form of activities in the Russian legislation does not, if it is not a state or municipal office). 5) Many of the Crimean Tatars have to take Russian citizenship, because they have land shares of agricultural land, which under Russian law could be provided to the property only to citizens of the Russian Federation. Residents fear that many will not be able to get a passport before the elections to the regional and local authorities of the Crimea, scheduled for September 14. according to information from the deputy head of the Federal Migration Service of Russia in the Crimea Frolova AM, by mid-April: - issued about 170,000 passports of citizens of the Russian Federation (according to FMS of Russia on 19 April - about 300,000) - about 1,200 people gave up Russian citizenship, of which only 8-10 people Crimean Tatars (according to information from the Federal Migration Service of Russia on 19 April - about 3,000 people). - for the whole period (1 month) in the Russian Federal Migration Service unit in the Republic of Crimea was charged with only one judgment in the case of establishing the fact of permanent residence in the Crimea on the above-named date. In acknowledgment of this fact is denied because of the message by the applicant, according to the court, false information. The whole documentation of Russian passports is very slow, the queue for obtaining passports lined up for several months (for example, only in one spatial point in Sevastopol record number exceeds 30,000 ). According to various estimates, for the certification of the entire population of the Crimea it takes at least 15 months, although the Russian legislation is allocated only 3 months. According to virtually all of the respondents citizens wishing to keep the citizenship of Ukraine Russian Federal Migration Service employees do not explain the rules of law on the Legal Status of Foreign Citizens in the Russian Federation : the need to travel for 90 days, the period of authorized stay of 90 days during every 180 days, the provisions of the administrative responsibility for violation of the rules of stay, providing to date in accordance with Art. 18.8 h. 1 of the Administrative Code fine with expulsion or not, and others. Although personal statement about the desire to keep the citizenship of Ukraine has a column "refuses to recognize themselves and their minor children of the Russian Federation citizens with the legal status of foreign citizens, stateless persons and the need to design the appropriate instrument, as well as the legal implications of the decision I have read. " The number of persons without citizenship in the Crimea on 1 January 2014. -. 462 people in newly issued Russian passports to the issuing authority specify the Federal migration service of Russia without specifying the name of the territorial authority since in the Crimea, they are not yet in. Registration (registration) Due to the fact that the Ukrainian authorities have closed access to the database records every apartment, in a newly issued passport does not give residence registration. If there is no uncertainty in the registration in the passport is stamped on the registration of residence, without specifying the name of the territorial body of the Federal Migration Service of Russia. Refuge in the Crimea have a refugee status to 18 people. Their legal status is in no way the law is not settled, as well as the unresolved legal status of persons in the procedure of registration of Ukrainian citizenship, residence in Ukraine or in the asylum procedure, but did not receive data status on March 18, 2014. Following the decision of the Federation Council of giving permission to the Russian President on the deployment of troops in Ukraine there was a significant wave of migration from the Crimea in Ukraine, is now migrating to Ukraine is insignificant. Registration of real property rights Ukraine has closed access to the databases of technical accounting of real estate information (BTI), and registration of real property rights, and the Russian government immediately seized the documentation from all territorial BTI in relation to the need for the prevailing conditions and making pereinventarizatsii in Russian accounting. The housing market "rose." In Ukraine, the mandatory notarial form of real estate transactions. The lack of a title document on the property greatly complicates the design (state registration) rights to it. The food and the products due to the current device industry and agriculture Crimea independently provides its own needs only 70%, the rest were imported from Ukraine. Until recently, there was different pricing on products and goods: the prices of goods in Simferopol is much lower than in Russia. After the elimination of border customs entrepreneurs from Krasnodar began buying goods and products for sale in mainland Russia. In order to prevent rising food prices and products requiring urgent conservation measures commodity and food balance and overall reorientation produktosnabzheniya and turnover in the Crimea from Ukraine to Russia. Educational institutions at all Simferopol was only one Ukrainian gymnasium in which the training took place in the Ukrainian language. She is now shifting towards training in Russian. In essence, the only specialized Department Ukrainian-Tatar philology at the Tauride Federal University is closed, too. It is necessary to restore education in Ukrainian gymnasium and the above-named Department of the Ukrainian language. Interethnic relations in recent years significantly worsened inter-ethnic relations on the principle of "friend or foe", open ethnic clashes and irresistible hatred manifestations as a whole is not. Religion and church organs of the new state government decided to actually eliminate the Orthodox church Kiev Patriarchate, currently experiencing difficulties in extending the lease of the building, which occupies the church Kiev Patriarchate. The situation is very tense. Islam. State power bodies of the Crimea was converted from Islam religion in protest ideology. In the mosques, and in fact in any Islamic family has current books Hizb-ut-Tahrir and other Islamic literature. Officially, this literature is banned by the Supreme Court of Hizb-ut-Tahrir as extremist organization, but in Ukraine it was banned and its literature is freely distributed in the mosques. For example, the religious community "Davet" won a lawsuit about its closure, Ukrainian court has not found in the organization of incitement to religious hatred. Currently, the organization is subject to the effective pressure law enforcement agencies, like other followers of the above flow. The resonant murder, detention and abduction of citizens caused widespread resonance of the brutal murder of the Crimean Tatar Reshat Ametova, born in 1975 He expressed his personal silent protest near the parliament of Crimea captured, according to witnesses - stood and looked into the eyes of the so-called samooborontsam, guarding the building, and the next day, the morning of 3 March, went from house to the military enlistment office and disappeared. His body was found on March 15 in a field near. Strawberry Belogorsk district - with signs of torture, his head was wrapped in duct tape, handcuffs on his feet. According to investigators - was killed in a road accident. We left the dead man's wife and three children, the youngest of 2.5 months. Ivan settlers propagating in Crimea Quran in Russian, was detained by police on referendum day, 16 March, and tortured, all this time it has not allowed a lawyer. Then exported outside of the Crimea on Chongar (Kherson region.) With the threat not to enter the Crimea for 30 years. As of April 17, abducted Crimean -. 3 people, and they are not of the Crimean Tatars. Banking system. Pensions and social benefits The banking system is experiencing great difficulties with the transfer of funds. Due to the nationalization of banks Privatbank actually ceased to serve private clients. None of the major international Russian banks (including Sberbank) can not enter into the Crimea, to recognize foreign states occupied territory, as in this case deprived of international status. For the arrival of international banks in the Crimea (including Russian) The National Bank of Ukraine will impose large fines. The day after the referendum, all social benefits were stopped. The Ukrainian authorities have stated that all citizens retained the citizenship of Ukraine, payment of pensions and social benefits It will be continued in full. However, now it is not clear when restored full banking service of individuals. Anyway, right now, the issue of payment of pensions and allowances to residents of the Crimea to the Crimea in nearby regions of Ukraine with bank cards. The greatest concern is the payment and receipt of funds from deposits discovered in Ukrainian banks by citizens, acquire the nationality of Russia. Also it raises questions and repay bank loans. The judicial system in h. 2 tablespoons. 23 of the Federal Constitutional Law of March 21, 2014 N 6-FKZ "On the adoption of the Russian Federation Republic of Crimea and the formation of the Russian Federation subjects of the new Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol" contains a reservation of the action in the Crimea, Ukrainian and Crimean laws 31 December 2014 at the same time, the judicial system has been translated into Russian law, a preventive measure sanctioned by the Code, judgments began to be imposed in the name of the Russian Federation. In accordance with Art. 8 of the case taken to production and not considered at the March 18, 2014 the case must be dealt with according to the rules defined by the relevant legislation of the Russian Federation, but in practice there are problems in the proceedings, especially criminal and administrative, in which the existing norms of the Russian legislation reduces, abolish, exempt or, on the contrary, tighten or introduce new responsibility, guarantee other rights (eg the right to a jury trial) compared with the norms of existing legislation. The media worrying is the situation for the media. To close a number of Internet portals, publications of different directions ( "AN-Crimea", "Events of Crimea", "Crimean time", "Republic"). According to the media, the Russian legislation creates a lot of restrictions, and therefore the quality of journalistic work inevitably decline. Business with the case of raiding on the part of the inhabitants of the Crimea Russian colleagues have not yet encountered, it was during the reign of Yanukovych. In Sevastopol raid felt weaker than in other regions of the Crimea. Land and position of the rural population when people were given land shares, which is virtually impossible to be isolated in nature, intervened in the case of land traders, by simple business schemes deceiving farmers. As a result, the vast majority of the land was in the ownership of merchants. Meanwhile, in the Crimea there are no big farms. Tourism Revenue from tourism in the budget of the Crimea and Sevastopol were minor, come mainly treated patients with broncho-pulmonary diseases. Foreign international tourist companies in the Crimea can not come because of the fear of heavy fines. The referendum According to almost all respondents experts and citizens: - the vast majority of the inhabitants of Sevastopol voted in a referendum for annexation to Russia (50-80% turnout), in the Crimea on different according to join the Russian 50-60% of the voters voted for a total turnout of 30-50% - residents of Crimea voted not so much for joining Russia, but for the termination, in their words, "corruption and lawlessness thieves dominance Donetsk henchmen." Residents of Sevastopol vote for joining Russia. Fears illegal armed groups in Sevastopol were higher than in other regions of the Crimea. Suggestions: 1. To extend the period for acceptance of the inhabitants of the Crimea decision to retain the citizenship of Ukraine, at least until December 31, 2014 2.
the website of the President of Russia’s Council on Civil Society and Human Rights (shortened to President’s Human Rights Council) posted a report that was quickly taken down as if it were toxic radioactive waste. According to this purported report about the March referendum to annex Crimea, the turnout of Crimean voters was only 30 percent. And of these, only half voted for the referendum–meaning only
15 percent of Crimean citizens voted for annexation.
