O'Leary writes to the Dyke-bitch

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,295
11,385
113
Low Earth Orbit
To: Kathleen Wynne
From: Kevin O’Leary
Re: New Cap and Trade Slush Fund
Hi Premier, just saw you are setting up a new $1.9 billion cap and trade fund that you and Finance Minister Charles Sousa will be overseeing. Congratulations, you two are now managing the largest hedge fund in Ontario’s history!
I’m just as optimistic as you are. But I recently made a promise to every taxpayer in Canada that I would call out mediocrity, incompetence and risk in government economic and fiscal policy, so I feel the need to verify a few things:
* This new slush fund will have its own independent and transparent account, right?
* I will need a quarterly statement of fund flows in and out of the account documenting the source and use of proceeds. After all, someone in your government might forget that this money was earmarked to reduce carbon emissions and spend it on something else.
* I expect to be informed on administrative head count. Rumour has it you're planning on hiring hundreds of new government employees to administer the fund. You know how snippety some people can get when you swell government payroll when no one else can find a job in this economy!
* I heard Mr. Sousa say on the radio that you're going to be making new and exciting investments in “green tech”. I will need to know the terms of each deal, what I paid for my equity or debt positions, my voting rights and what governance is in place in each investment.
* I expect you’ll be hiring an independent auditing firm to value each investment on a mark to market basis and provide a going concern letter in cases where investments might not have worked out as planned. Also “green tech” companies have a nasty habit of going bankrupt as soon as their government subsidies end, but with your and Mr. Sousa’s long track record of picking winners in this industry, I’m not worried about that.
* I’d like you to offer some consolation to parents in Ontario who are concerned they're leaving their children a $308 billion debt. Such worry warts! Yes, our $308 billion debt makes Ontario the most leveraged jurisdiction in North America. We now have twice the debt of the state of California with half the population!
* Oh yes, just one more thing. You promised that this initiative was going to reduce carbon emissions, so I will need the reduction data on a quarterly basis as well.
I know your critics say you could have left all this money in the hands of companies that employ thousands of Ontario workers and in the pockets of entrepreneurs who create new jobs in Ontario, but you told us you could do a better job with it and you didn’t give us a choice anyway. We're already one of the most uncompetitive and highest taxed jurisdictions in North America, so who cares about a few more billion in taxes?
Well, maybe some taxpayers did care. They were some of the 29,000 Ontario residents that were affected by your last 2% super tax on Ontario’s high earners. I know they were very concerned about air quality too. Many moved to Nassau where carbon emissions are low. They don’t pay tax in Ontario any more so let’s forget about them. They're not going to give us any more trouble or tax revenue.
On behalf of myself and all the Ontario taxpayers who still live here, I want to know that you're our leader on this fund.
Before you know it, there's going to be another election in Ontario and I’m going to make damn sure both of you get all the credit you deserve on this.
Oh, and good luck with the funds performance. No one else on earth has ever reduced emissions or made money doing this, so I’ll be watching and keeping everybody informed with all the good news that is sure to be coming. And, of course, we will all be breathing easier watching those carbon emissions plunge as soon as you start spending this money!
Yours respectfully,
Kevin O’Leary
@kevinolearytv
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
I hope this works as part of a plan to defeat the Liberals in Ontario. The trouble is, will any negative statements printed about her be associated with the party? If we look at Dalton McGuinty, we see the same destructive decisions were made before she was premier. The incompetence isn't just her in my view, but the party itself. It is reckless.

308 billion dollars in debt and climbing. It'd madness.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
I hope this works as part of a plan to defeat the Liberals in Ontario. The trouble is, will any negative statements printed about her be associated with the party? If we look at Dalton McGuinty, we see the same destructive decisions were made before she was premier. The incompetence isn't just her in my view, but the party itself. It is reckless.

308 billion dollars in debt and climbing. It'd madness.

That's not the point. Criticize the policy, present an alternative, but no need to insult.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
That's not the point. Criticize the policy, present an alternative, but no need to insult.

It's human nature. People react differently to common problems.

Many Ontarians are talking about her this way. To me, it indicates a problem with her party's direction and is the result of a lack of competent governance. It is a symptom of frustration and anger, and indicates a larger problem. Far fewer people would talk about her that way if Ontario had a 308 billion dollar surplus.

Don't get sidetracked because of one person's use of language.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,295
11,385
113
Low Earth Orbit
No he isn't and what makes you think that? He is being an "information auditor" that freely disseminates what he finds be it good or bad and that is a blessing to the masses.

When someone who understands money steps up to explain to the ignorant and hold Govt accountable it's a good thing. A really good thing.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,466
138
63
Location, Location
You think O'Leary understands money? He understands how to fill his own pockets at the expense of unit holders and shareholders, that's true.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
You think O'Leary understands money? He understands how to fill his own pockets at the expense of unit holders and shareholders, that's true.

Whether that is true or not, the letter has nothing to do with lining his own pockets. It is a criticism of Wynne's management of provincial money. Both her supporters and detractors are having a difficult time understanding many of the Liberal's decisions which have led to severe financial hardships.

Mr. O'Leary is working to change the mismanagement by bringing some of her government's decisions into the light.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,295
11,385
113
Low Earth Orbit
You think O'Leary understands money? He understands how to fill his own pockets at the expense of unit holders and shareholders, that's true.

And he does that with no knowledge of money?

I take every opportunity that is legal to line my pockets Ethics be damned.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
No he isn't and what makes you think that? He is being an "information auditor" that freely disseminates what he finds be it good or bad and that is a blessing to the masses.

When someone who understands money steps up to explain to the ignorant and hold Govt accountable it's a good thing. A really good thing.

Not so much when it is your favorite government.

On the bright side she bought back 220 jobs for just $26million.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,843
92
48
Walter ,your offensive

I think Kevin is drinking too much of that fine wine
You're, not your. Please get the grammar correct or you will be thought of as a dolt.

You think O'Leary understands money? He understands how to fill his own pockets at the expense of unit holders and shareholders, that's true.
I've made good money following his advice.