Monsef's road to electoral reform may not be able to bypass referendum

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
The 'experts' speak, but they don't support the Liberal narrative, so...

Heads up, average (or otherwise) Canadian voter: Have you spent your summer stubbornly tuning out earnest entreaties from your local MP and/or other aggressively civic-minded democratic do-gooders to spend an evening poking through the innards of the federal electoral system in search of a fairer, more representative alternative?


More specifically, have you been holding out for the opportunity to share your views on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s pledge to scrap First Past The Post the old-fashioned way: by marking an X in the appropriate box on a ballot?


If so, you can take tentative comfort in the fact that, with very few exceptions, virtually every expert witness to testify before the House committee charged with studying the issue seems to agree — albeit reluctantly, in some cases, and only when pressed, with dramatically varying degrees of enthusiasm — that any attempt to change the vote-counting formula without widespread public support would be spectacularly ill-advised and politically risky, although almost certainly not actively unconstitutional.


mo


@Kady: Monsef’s road to electoral reform may not be able to bypass referendum | Ottawa Citizen
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
75
Eagle Creek
A friend and I were talking about this the other day and he put it this way. If you are a Conservative you will more than likely pick the Libs as your second choice on the ballot. If you are NDP you are also more than likely to pick the Liberals as your second choice. Anyway you look at it, if this system goes through the Libs have a ticket to ride for however long they care too. Not my idea of a democracy.