Ontario to spend $7-billion in sweeping climate change plan

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Good stuff.

Ontario to spend $7-billion in sweeping climate change plan

The Ontario government will spend more than $7-billion over four years on a sweeping climate change plan that will affect every aspect of life – from what people drive to how they heat their homes and workplaces – in a bid to slash the province’s carbon footprint.

Ontario will begin phasing out natural gas for heating, provide incentives to retrofit buildings and give rebates to drivers who buy electric vehicles. It will also require that gasoline sold in the province contain less carbon, bring in building code rules requiring all new homes by 2030 to be heated with electricity or geothermal systems, and set a target for 12 per cent of all new vehicle sales to be electric by 2025.

While such policies are likely to be popular with ecoconscious voters, who will now receive government help to green their lives, they are certain to cause mass disruption for the province’s automotive and energy sectors, which will have to make significant changes to the way they do business. And they have already created tension within the government between Environment Minister Glen Murray and some of his fellow ministers who worry he is going too far.

The 57-page Climate Change Action Plan was debated by Premier Kathleen Wynne’s cabinet Wednesday and subsequently obtained by The Globe and Mail. Stamped “Cabinet Confidential,” the document lays out a strategy from 2017 to 2021. It contains about 80 different policies, grouped into 32 different “actions.” Each action has a price tag attached to it, as well as an estimate of the amount of emissions it will cut by 2020.

The Globe had previously uncovered details of the plan, but this is the first time the full blueprint has been revealed. The strategy is scheduled to be further reviewed by cabinet ministers and fine-tuned, sources said, with public release slated for June.

The many new programs will be paid for out of revenue from the province’s upcoming cap-and-trade system, which is expected to be approved by the legislature this week and come into effect at the start of next year. Together, the cap-and-trade system and the action plan are the backbone of the province’s strategy to cut emissions to 15 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020, 37 per cent by 2030 and 80 per cent by 2050.

“We are on the cusp of a once-in-a-lifetime transformation. It’s a transformation of how we look at our planet and the impact we have on it,” reads a preamble to the plan signed by Ms. Wynne. “It’s a transformation that will forever change how we live, work, play and move.”

Cutting natural gas, which currently provides 76 per cent of heating, will require mass adoption of green technologies in buildings across the province. The plan lists geothermal systems, air heat pumps and rooftop solar panels as technologies that will be eligible for rebates. It could also require an expansion of the electricity grid. The plan promises, however, to subsidize any increased electricity costs for homeowners.

The electric vehicle targets represent a sea change for the province’s $16-billion auto sector. The 2025 goal would boost to about 86,000 the number of annual electric vehicle sales, more than 20 times the number of electric vehicles sold in the province so far this century.

Ontario to spend $7-billion on sweeping climate change plan - The Globe and Mail
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Somehow I doubt squandering 7 billion is going to make Ontario's climate any better. Still going to be colder than a banker's heart in winter.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
Ecofascism. Still wonder what it is? See above.

BTW, I'm going with a boiler when the heat pump kicks it. Geothermal can't handle sweeping climate changes.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
Somehow I doubt squandering 7 billion is going to make Ontario's climate any better. Still going to be colder than a banker's heart in winter.

Sadly, after all that money is squandered the climate will continue to change as it always has.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Kill NG?? Wow that seems a tad foolish considering how cheap it is at the moment and the only drawback is a new line would be needed.
Going electric is fine as long as Alberta doesn't have to foot the bill for the cost of that transition which would include a few new centrally located power stations rather than each place having a 'fat boy' of NG in reserve just in case there is a disruption in supply. That means the cost isn't part of the spreadsheet that sets what the transfer payments are.

It will be interesting to see just how Ontario cuts use while the yearly climate indicates a longer winter. An electric car and a blizzard, wonderful combination. NG fueled car and blizzard= impromptu fondoo.

ES you should look at the pile of cash the US already burns through needlessly before you use the term 'all that money' as it is a small pile rather than a large one. Just what have you been fed in the past???

Somehow I doubt squandering 7 billion is going to make Ontario's climate any better. Still going to be colder than a banker's heart in winter.
While Alberta is under Chinook like conditions for another 500 years. Some things you just have to put up with. I guess 'we' could always run our pipelines to Mexico along with the new roads and rail networks. Back to the days of the buffalo so to speak.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
10,616
5,255
113
Olympus Mons
$7 billion dollars, meanwhile just recently the LPO was begging people to donate their tax refunds to them. Yep, we don't have money for stuff like decent health care anymore, or mental health care for adults, or homeless programs. But we sure gots $7 billion for the Wynned sock to force her f*cking idiotic ideology on the entire province.


Geo-thermal, what a goddam joke. Ontario's geo-thermal potential is miserable. The only way for Ontario to tap directly into geo-thermal power is through fracking. Of course, since this is some greentard's idea, fracking will suddenly become a good thing with absolutely zero potential for seismic side-effects.


Of course, guess what else the Wynned sock's plan does? It ensures the profits of those who have already purchased, and those who will purchase shares in Hydro One. It's exactly the same as any govt telling any other publicly traded company that you'll ensure their profits by eliminating any other competitive products/services from the marketplace.


Now Flossie, I hope you feel good about having your standard of living reduced as you're forced to help rich f*cks realize the full profit potential from their investment.


Oh, and btw, since b*tchface plans on scrapping natgas altogether, what do YOU suggest we use as "backup" for all the worthless windfarms in Ontario. How do we keep the flexibility in our power supply?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Coal fired power plants have actually increased global biomass cover.

Wynne's an idiot. BTW, Bitch ... I NEED A RAISE!

Not until your bathroom is cross gender.


There are grants for that I understand.
 

grumpydigger

Electoral Member
Mar 4, 2009
566
1
18
Kelowna BC
LOL...it does not do nothing but waste money and keep the Suzuki fan cub happy...china mexico India will keep on puking out pollution and taking our jobs
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
these idiots will believe anything that is sold to them under the guise of unicorns and rainbows. the future is grim kids.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
When many countries came out with cars that pollute less, the US presented the world with the SUV.
That is because the US uses so much oil that the gasoline produced is in the range that you need vehicles to get no more than 30mpg or the nation ends up with a surplus of gasoline and that is not a product that stores well. When we star refining less oil there will be less gas so there will be fewer vehicles using gas or if the number remains the same mileage would have to average 40mpg (or whatever).
That is also why we don't have hydrogen powered cars, the fuel that is available is gasoline and there are no plans to produce hydrogen as long as gasoline is around. (that being said electric rides for trips to the 'corner store' means everybody would be driving something rather than just the ones that can afford a vehicle and when the average price is $30k that might not be the majority of the population during a depression.

If Canada went electric and developed a highly efficient system would it get axed the way the Arrow did? If that is the case the whole exercise is pissing money into the wind, intentionally.

Thank God they did, it was so easy to drag my kids around in a big vehicle.
Now they are driving small cars guess who gets left behind grandpa???
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,617
2,365
113
Toronto, ON
That is because the US uses so much oil that the gasoline produced is in the range that you need vehicles to get no more than 30mpg or the nation ends up with a surplus of gasoline and that is not a product that stores well. When we star refining less oil there will be less gas so there will be fewer vehicles using gas or if the number remains the same mileage would have to average 40mpg (or whatever).
That is also why we don't have hydrogen powered cars, the fuel that is available is gasoline and there are no plans to produce hydrogen as long as gasoline is around. (that being said electric rides for trips to the 'corner store' means everybody would be driving something rather than just the ones that can afford a vehicle and when the average price is $30k that might not be the majority of the population during a depression.

If Canada went electric and developed a highly efficient system would it get axed the way the Arrow did? If that is the case the whole exercise is pissing money into the wind, intentionally.


Now they are driving small cars guess who gets left behind grandpa???

Most CO2 is from China. What the USA does is maybe slightly more consequential than Canada but inconsequential none the less when compared to China .... if you believe CO2 is an issue.

People with larger families will be driving mini-vans and SUVs. Single people and young couples may choose cool small cars or it may be the family's second car. Almost nobody but the rich and stupid buys an electric car. Even flossy doesn't own one.