Komagata Maru: Justin Trudeau to apologize for 1914 incident

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Komagata Maru: Justin Trudeau to apologize for 1914 incident

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will offer an apology in the House of Commons on May 18 almost 102 years after the Komagata Maru incident, where the government of the day turned away more than 300 Indians seeking a better life in Canada.

In 2008, then-prime minister Stephen Harper apologized to the Sikh community in Surrey, B.C., but many demanded he make a formal apology in the Commons.

The Sikh community will get its wish next month, Trudeau announced in Ottawa Monday.

"As a nation, we should never forget the prejudice suffered by the Sikh community at the hands of the Canadian government of the day. We should not and we will not," he said.

"That is why, next month, on May 18th, I will stand in the House of Commons and offer a full apology for the Komagata Maru incident."

Trudeau called the laws that allowed the Canadian government to turn the Komagata Maru away discriminatory.

"The passengers of the Komagata Maru, like millions of immigrants to Canada since, were seeking refuge, and better lives for their families. With so much to contribute to their new home, they chose Canada and we failed them utterly," he said.

Discriminatory laws

In 1910, an order-in-council was passed which stated immigrants coming to Canada must do so by continuous journey. As a result, Gurdit Singh chartered the Japanese ship Komagata Maru and sold tickets for a continuous journey from the Punjab state to Canada.

The Komagata Maru sailed into Vancouver harbour with 376 people aboard on May 23, 1914.

The passengers argued a 1908 provision that required all "Asiatic" immigrants to have $200 did not apply to them because they were British subjects. At the time, India was still a colony.

The dominion government would not allow the passengers to disembark and the vessel sat in the harbour for two months.

That July, the government ordered the ship to sail but the passengers took over the ship and refused to leave.

On July 19, 125 Vancouver police officers and 35 special immigration agents attempted to board the vessel and were beaten back. Thirty were injured.

On July 23, under the guns of the naval cruiser HMCS Rainbow, the Komagata Maru was escorted out to sea and returned to India.

Komagata Maru: Justin Trudeau to apologize for 1914 incident - British Columbia - CBC News
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,636
6,979
113
B.C.
Does anyone really care ?
Do we need to feel guilty for the sins of our forefathers ?
Were they really sins ?
How much money will follow this apology ?
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Does anyone really care ?
Do we need to feel guilty for the sins of our forefathers ?
Were they really sins ?
How much money will follow this apology ?

Yes.
No.
Yes.
For what?
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Perhaps, Trudeau will assume full responsibility for the Spanish Inquisition on behalf of Canada... It's the right thing to do

 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,843
92
48
Justine should apologize for his parents having conceived him.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Perhaps we can avoid slippery slope arguments.

Perhaps.

Why?

There have been an extraordinary number of atrocities committed over the centuries against pretty much every race and culture... Trudeau is simply cherry-picking a few select ones. Ignoring all of them is is discriminatory in and of itself.

So, lets start with the Spanish Inquisition (or Black Plague if you prefer) and work our way forward.

Deal?
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,636
6,979
113
B.C.
Yes.
No.
Yes.
For what?
Yes , so who is it that care ?
No , if we aren't guilty for the sins of our fathers why are we apologizing for them?
Yes , explain the sin . Does a sovereign nation not have control of who is and who isn't allowed into their country ?
For what .Doesn't compensation follow an apology ? We sure paid out the Japanese .
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Why?

There have been an extraordinary number of atrocities committed over the centuries against pretty much every race and culture... Trudeau is simply cherry-picking a few select ones. Ignoring all of them is is discriminatory in and of itself.

So, lets start with the Spanish Inquisition (or Black Plague if you prefer) and work our way forward.

Deal?



If Canada was responsible, then I'd agree with you. Since Canada is not responsible for "the Inquisition" then no. At this point, all you are doing is showing your ignorance.

This is the Government of Canada apologising for a wrong perpetrated by the Government of Canada.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,636
6,979
113
B.C.
If Canada was responsible, then I'd agree with you. Since Canada is not responsible for "the Inquisition" then no. At this point, all you are doing is showing your ignorance.

This is the Government of Canada apologising for a wrong perpetrated by the Government of Canada.
Is anyone apologizing to the jews that weren't allowed to land in Halifax prior to WW2 ?
It is much more recent and similar circumstances , or does anybody care ?

Is anyone apologizing to the jews that weren't allowed to land in Halifax prior to WW2 ?
It is much more recent and similar circumstances , or does anybody care ?
See nobody cares I mean they were just white jews.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
In 2008, then-prime minister Stephen Harper apologized to the Sikh community in Surrey, B.C., but many demanded he make a formal apology in the Commons.


end of story. time to move on kids.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Please enlighten us as to what he should have done to make it a heartfelt, genuine apology.