NDP Figures Out What They Did To Lose 2015 Election


tay
#1
If party activists were frustrated by the NDP's shift to the centre in the last election campaign, they will now have a chance to endorse a wide range of resolutions at the party's convention in Edmonton that would take the party in a much different direction.

Delegates from across the country could vote on whether to embrace policies that have been largely ignored by current NDP Leader Tom Mulcair: a universal living wage, free dental care for all, "public" banking, an endorsement of the Leap Manifesto, the ripping up of all trade deals and putting socialism back in the party constitution.

If adopted, the NDP would effectively return to its roots as a party characterized by social democratic — if not outright socialist — principles.

"Canadians, in the light of our party's 2015 election campaign, have been left in doubt about the NDP's primary convictions," one resolution from Nova Scotia says. "Be it resolved that the New Democratic Party of Canada will assume the responsibility to advocate courageously and explain the social democratic perspective in the public arena."

Many of the proposed resolutions, however, will not make the convention floor.

Here is a look at a few of the hundreds of proposed resolutions (external - login to view) party members could consider this weekend:

Proposed NDP resolutions reveal grassroots itching to shift to the left - Politics - CBC News
 
Walter
#2
They gotta be more like Santa Claus to win.
 
lone wolf
Free Thinker
+1
#3
It's easy: Mulcair got dragged into the Hijab humdrum
 
mentalfloss
#4
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolfView Post

It's easy: Mulcair got dragged into the Hijab humdrum

This and Liberals swung left.
 
IdRatherBeSkiing
+3
#5  Top Rated Post
I think in 4 years, being left is not where you will want to be to be elected in Canada.
 
lone wolf
Free Thinker
+2
#6
I think they should ALL be left ... on the Moon
 
grumpydigger
#7
tom is not jack
tom was acting jack was not
 
coldstream
-1
#8
I think if the NDP lost that inisipid name, New Democratic Party, went back to CCF, Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, with its prairie populist and evangelical roots, and its strong moral identity and cause of economic justice, it'd stand a chance.

The party is now in the thrall of New Age urban causes, homosexuality, abortion, euthenasia.. is viewed as anti family, anti faith, and anti business.. and has absolutely no natural franchise on which to draw.

They got outdone on their own urban terrain by an empty headed little twit like Justin, pandering to any post structural demographic and utterly clueless as how to govern a country.
Last edited by coldstream; Apr 7th, 2016 at 01:13 PM..
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by grumpydiggerView Post

tom is not jack
tom was acting jack was not

See Tom Jack
Jack, Tom, Jack
 
lone wolf
Free Thinker
#10
Dick and Jane must have caused you an absolute tizzy
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+1
#11
I don't think the N.D.P. did anything to lose the election. To begin with Jack Layton was an aberration and it was his persona that rose them above their historic level of 35 seats. Many people predicted after Jack's passing they would settle back to their historic level (anywhere from two to 35 seats) N.D.P. has always done well until someone else's money runs out!
 
Walter
+1
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

To begin with Jack Layton was an aberration and it was his persona that rose them above their historic level of 35 seats.

Good old Rub-n-Tug Jack.
 
taxslave
No Party Affiliation
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

This and Liberals swung left.

No they didn't. They were always kind of left. The problem the dippers have is that they are extreme left and regarded by most Canadians as nothing more than a protest vote.

Quote: Originally Posted by coldstreamView Post

I think if the NDP lost that inisipid name, New Democratic Party, went back to CCF, Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, with its prairie populist and evangelical roots, and its strong moral identity and cause of economic justice, it'd stand a chance.

The party is now in the thrall of New Age urban causes, homosexuality, abortion, euthenasia.. is viewed as anti family, anti faith, and anti business.. and has absolutely no natural franchise on which to draw.

They got outdone on their own urban terrain by an empty headed little twit like Justin, pandering to any post structural demographic and utterly clueless as how to govern a country.

The NDP roots has always been radical socialist.
 
Angstrom
No Party Affiliation
+1
#14
They should just name it the feminist federal party. Would save anyone the time of figuring what they stand for.

They lost because all the feminist have a crush on pony.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by AngstromView Post

They should just name it the feminist federal party. Would save anyone the time of figuring what they stand for.

They lost because all the feminist have a crush on pony.


Another largely over looked fact is when Layton took the hundred plus seats a great number of the occupants were greenhorns at politics and the N.D.P. (in other words "warm bodies")
 
coldstream
-1
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslaveView Post



The NDP roots has always been radical socialist.

Only Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, NRA.. libertarians, gun nuts and proponents of regressive taxation and massive deregulation in support of corporate interests.. ignoramuses.. believe that.

They form a cancerous growth of real Conservatism that has deformed the cause into NeoLiberalism with its goddess of Ayn Rand.. and enabling financial and trading trusts to exploit and enslave working people on a global scale.

The CCF started as a Social Democratic Party.. in response to the exploitation of working people by Trusts, a conspiracy against real Free Enterprise.. in support of profit over fairly compensated and dignified labour.

The NDP has been ruined by buying into the social side of fragmenting libertarianism.. post structural, amoral, in support of radical individualism and moral relativism.

I'd do some research, Taxslave, before displaying your ignorance, blind neocon ideology and stupidity in published posts.
Last edited by coldstream; Apr 8th, 2016 at 01:03 PM..
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#17
I think the N.D.P. should quit agonizing why they "lost" the last Federal election. They didn't lose anything, they simply returned to their historic level. Unless 70% of the population lose their mind they will never form Gov't. federally. That is no slur on the N.D.P............it's simply not their role. They are "watch dogs".
 
tay
#18
NDP Base Is Crying Out For Principled Left Leadership


Canada's two main opposition parties are in the throes of selecting new leaders to replace Stephen Harper and Thomas Mulcair. Both found themselves walking the plank after losing the 2015 General Election. The Conservatives face the spectacle of 14 candidates vying to become Leader of the Official Opposition. The New Democratic Party has attracted four candidates to its leadership contest.

The NDP is seen to be the one with the toughest hill to climb. The party faithful believes that the NDP lost ground because it allowed itself to be outmanoeuvred by the Liberal Party -- on the left. The NDP's fiscal policy appeared to be a continuation of the Harper mantra of balanced budgets. Its austerity-lite policy not only cost the NDP the 2015 federal election but also several recent provincial elections.

Members, including NDP candidates, feel frustrated when they discover that key elements of the electoral platform bear little or no resemblance to policies democratically adopted at a convention. This is emblematic of a party that is undemocratically run from the top and is out of touch with its base. The leadership contest is an opportunity to address some of these problems, and to see which of the candidates are seriously listening to the expressed desire of the rank and file to move the party to the left.

What is needed to fill the void? NDP members are crying out for principled leadership on issues like the following:

Pipelines

The NDP cannot be for more pipelines. It is time to say no new pipelines, and commit to a transition from the current carbon-based economy to a clean, green energy economy. This would entail a massive investment in new technology, and in the re-training of displaced workers.

Free Trade Agreements

Currently, the NDP is all over the map. Its MPs agreed with the South Korean FTA, opposed the TPP, and were practically silent on CETA. Plus, we've had precious little to say about the renegotiation of NAFTA. We cannot support FTAs that undermine our health care, education or water systems. Nor can we support Chapter 11 clauses that impinge upon democratic sovereignty. It is time to bring the labour movement, the environmental movement and First Nations to the table, and challenge the corporate agenda.

Privatization

New Democrats reject Public Private Partnerships and say NO to privatization. Trudeau recently announced a fire sale of public assets to his friends on Bay Street through his so-called "flywheel of investment" model. This flywheel will be paid for by road and bridge tolls, in addition to user fees. Instead, the NDP should advocate a Social Investment Bank to invest heavily in social housing, public transit and other long neglected infrastructure improvements.

Party Democracy

I'm hearing from some party insiders that certain topics should not be discussed in the leadership debates. Issues such as the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, they argue, can be polarizing and therefore are not fair to centrist candidates. I guess one could extend that logic to pipelines or free trade agreements. Hell...why even bother having a leadership contest?

Let's just pick the next leader's name out of a hat and allow the party controllers to develop another milquetoast platform for the 2019 election. The alternative is greater democracy in the party. That should include more time at conventions to debate and vote on policy, and a requirement that the election platform reflects adopted party policy.

Foreign Policy

It is high time the NDP took a principled approach to the Middle East. It can no longer support Israel "right or wrong" and be silent when human rights atrocities and land expropriations are carried out against Palestinians. The occupation must end, and the wall must come down. The NDP must articulate its past policy of Canada Out of NATO, and oppose Ottawa's alignment with U.S.-backed aggression in Eastern Europe and Syria/Iraq.

Inequality

The growth of precarious employment, two-tier benefits, low wages, and lack of decent, affordable housing all contribute to the social cancer of growing inequality. The NDP should be in the forefront of efforts, inside and outside of Parliament, to turn this around. We need NDP action campaigns to raise the minimum wage to $15/hour, to share the benefits of robotization and gains in productivity by reducing the workweek without loss of pay and benefits, to defend health care and education from cuts and user fees, and to move rapidly away from regressive taxes in favour of progressive taxes on corporations and the rich.

By a just distribution of the wealth created by working people, a country as rich as Canada can abolish post-secondary education fees, cancel student debt, and provide quality national childcare. Billions can be saved by creating a public pharmaceutical provider. The NDP should be the party of the social justice movements, of tenants, farmers, jobless youth, injured workers, victims of price gouging telecoms and energy giants, of environmentalists, social innovators and equality seekers, rather than just a sideline supporter of them.

Since last October, a team of NDP activists from across Canada, including Quebec, have been urging me to join the leadership contest. The premise is that I have a proven track record on key policy areas, such as those listed above. That is where I have stood during my 25-year career as a leader in the labour movement within the Canadian Union of Public Employees and the Ontario Federation of Labour.

I can say, without fear of contradiction, that national union leaders -- by and large -- do not speak for their members when it comes to supporting the NDP. Only four out of 54 national unions in Canada openly support the NDP. The union members who belong to the NDP are miles ahead of their leaders on progressive politics, with a few notable exceptions. The NDP leadership contest will not be won by lining up national union leaders, but rather by engaging in the hard slog of reaching the base, local union by local union.

The party is doomed to sit on the sidelines for generations if we elect a centrist leader with another mushy middle-of-the-road platform. NDP members want a leader with a solid commitment to socialist principles. I have yet to finalize my decision and give an answer to the "Draft Sid" campaign. In part, this is due to my fear of dividing the left vote, and in part, it is because the candidates who have announced so far have yet to flesh out their campaign platforms. If the NDP left can unite behind a genuine socialist candidate, we may be able to avoid a continuation of the debilitating policies and practices of recent years, and confidently head towards victory.

NDP Base Is Crying Out For Principled Left Leadership*|*Sid Ryan (external - login to view)
 

Similar Threads

0
Wild Rose Lose Calgary By-Election
by tay | Mar 23rd, 2016
2
Dems lose big time November 3, 2015
by Walter | Nov 5th, 2015
26
An Election Today? Tories Would Lose 23 Seats
by FiveParadox | Jun 13th, 2010
no new posts