The Cost of Government Debt in Canada, 2016

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
Don't think government debt matters?

Canadian governments spent same on interest payments as they did on K-12 education.

Budget deficits and increasing debt are key fiscal issues as the federal and provincial governments prepare to release their budgets this year. Combined federal and provincial net debt has increased from $834 billion in 2007/08 to a projected $1.3 trillion in 2015/16. This combined debt equals 64.8% of the economy or $35,827 for every man, woman, and child living in Canada.

Debt accumulation has costs. One major consequence is that governments must make interest payments on their debt similar to households that pay interest on borrowing related to mortgages, vehicles, or credit card spending. Spending on interest payments consumes government revenues and leaves less money available for other important priorities such as spending on health care and education or tax relief.

Canadian governments (including local governments) collectively spent an estimated $60.8 billion on interest payments in 2014/15. That works out to 8.1% of their total revenue that year. To further put the amount spent on interest payments in perspective, it is more than what is spent on pension benefits through the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans ($50.9 billion), and approximately equal to Canada’s total public spending on primary and secondary education ($62.2 billion, as of 2012/13, the last year for which we have finalized data).


The Cost of Government Debt in Canada, 2016 | Fraser Institute
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
This debt problem should be a concern to every Canadian. One would think that at some point people would welcome and even demand cutbacks But they keep demanding more and more funding for social programs, many of which are fluff vote buyers) that could easily be done without.
It is beyond comprehension how the Liberals can even contemplate running a $10 billion deficit at this time!
That $60 billion paid out in interest would go a long way to improving our essential services.
I can't imagine how this is all going to end, but at some future point it will have to be dealt with. Are we going to end up like Greece?
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
It all depends on what the money is spent on. Spending on infrastructure is actually an investment in the future and social spending is vital in any modern democracy - unless you really don't want spending on healthcare, education, etc. And if debt payment actually is eight percent of total spending that is relatively low. Most average Canadians would be quite happy to be spending less that 10% of their income on interest payments.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,386
11,444
113
Low Earth Orbit
Ecofascist sustainable inflation and carbon taxation is the Liberal plan. If inflation outpaces interest rates we have fake growth.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
He's doing the exact same thing as his old man, all the way down to the tards voting for a pretty face and no substance

Smart money is already looking for opportunities and locations outside of Canukistan
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
It sure is shaping-up that way.

Seeing how Justin doesn't support direct Canadian military intervention, I wonder if we'll see a big economic boon in the warm jackets and fuzzy mittens sector here in Canada?
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
It all depends on what the money is spent on. Spending on infrastructure is actually an investment in the future and social spending is vital in any modern democracy - unless you really don't want spending on healthcare, education, etc. And if debt payment actually is eight percent of total spending that is relatively low. Most average Canadians would be quite happy to be spending less that 10% of their income on interest payments.


It doesn't matter where the money is spent. Debt is debt and interest is interest.
If the useless, 'feel good' social programs didn't exist, neither would the debt. And there would be plenty of money to fund essential services like Health Care, Education, Justice, Welfare and Pensions.

It isn't enough that new arenas, municipal building, libraries, hospitals, schools and police stations are built, they are built on an unnecessarily grand scale with more emphasis on fancy modern architecture than on funciionality. The waste space in the new infrastructure buildings serves no useful purpose other than to 'look nice'.

And while governments spend exorbitant sums to impress, they let the bridges and highways deteriorate, close jails and cut down on hospital care.

Governments started going into serious unsustainable debt when they attacked the tobacco industry. Like it or not, the tobacco industry funded athletics, arts & entertainment, health care and provided tens of thousands of jobs. When the tobacco industry's funding stopped, governments had to flounder around to make up the loss. They couldn't make it up so had to start running huge deficits. They killed the goose that laid the golden egg. And for what? Air quality is worse now than ever, people are sicker than ever and getting sicker at younger ages.
Attacking the tobacco industry was the biggest mistake the governments ever made.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
Yup, right now each Canadian owes $17,000 yup it'll be $40,000.
You can thank Trudeau Senior for that and not relying on the B.O.C. for government loans interest free...
Maybe because the bank might not let the government spend like a drunken sailor...
The son sure takes after the father for that"little" quirk!
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Smart money is already looking for opportunities and locations outside of Canukistan

Really? Then I'm guessing that none of it is yours.

You can thank Trudeau Senior for that and not relying on the B.O.C. for government loans interest free...
Maybe because the bank might not let the government spend like a drunken sailor...
The son sure takes after the father for that"little" quirk!

You don't really know much about Canada's debt history do you? When Trudeau senior stepped down Canada's ratio of debt to GDP was 25%. When Brian Mulroney stepped down the debt to GDP ration was 70%. When Paul Martin stepped down the Liberals had it down to under 50%. And Stephen Harper has it back up to over 80%. So in fact the "drunken sailors" appear to pretty much have been mostly Conservatives.
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
LOL. You think the debt is going to go up $612 billion in four years...?

It depends on the per second debt clock. It has seen a ten fold increase before.


In 2008, the debt clock was going up by $183.92 per second,

In 2009, the clock, and the federal debt began growing by $1,772.57 per second.