Canada shocks COP21 with big new climate goal

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Canada shocks COP21 with big new climate goal

Sunday night, Canada surprised a world of nations and negotiators in closed-door climate talks in Paris by endorsing a bolder, more ambitious target for cutting greenhouse gases than the UN climate change summit is officially aiming for.

Canada’s Environment and Climate Change Minister Catherine McKenna told a stunned crowd that she wants the Paris agreement to restrict planetary warming to just 1.5 Celsius warming —not two degrees. It was the first time she has made such a statement.

In the room was former CBC meteorologist Claire Martin, a Green Party observer at the talks. “I was freaking out,” she said. "I was writing it all down like a nut."

Reading from her notes, Martin reported the minister’s remarks like so: "'We want to send a strong political signal.’ The necessity, that she sees, is one in which we transition sustainably.”

“But she was quite clear —‘I support the goals of 1.5’— and echoed the comments of another party about human rights and indigenous peoples. Canada supports legally binding provisions, and we are committed to following through.”

"She wants a five-year review, and it must be 'ambitious' and 'accountable.'"

"Adaptation is 'incredibly important' and she has full support for the ambitious nature of this agreement," Martin added, about the minister's remarks.

McKenna's office confirms it

Minister McKenna's spokesperson confirmed Monday that she supports "including reference in the Paris Agreement to the recognition of the ‎need to striving to limit global warming to 1.5, as other parties have said."

"Canada wants an agreement that is ambitious and that is signed by the greatest number of countries possible."

And crucially, “the most important thing is that each country should be legally required to submit a target. And to report on progress on that target on a regular basis."

Canada shocks COP21 with big new climate goal | National Observer
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
/ popcorn.

This train wreck is going to be entertaining to watch.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,297
11,386
113
Low Earth Orbit
If it's only about curtailing climate change then this will be cheap like borscht and super super easy. Doing that will only cost 32¢ per person on the planet per year whether or not it's real or not.

If it starts to cool off are we required to warm it up back to average if we ever get as warm as average?
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
as obomba said:
"expect electricity to go through the roof"
...
and more dead pacifics
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Come and visit the PRC for a few weeks. You'll quickly appreciate the online pictures of clear blue skies and dream of clear starry nights.

... and we should expect that to get a lot worse as the Chinese become wealthier.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
... and we should expect that to get a lot worse as the Chinese become wealthier.

Beijing is even worse than here. Some residents choose to literally wear gas masks there. And I think it's bad enough here.

I'm heading for Wuhan tomorrow and hope the smog will be a little thinner there.

Let's not think it will not reach Canada in the next thirty years. The Japanese are already complaining about Chinese smog reaching as far as Japan!
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Lol

Manufacturing is part of an antiquated economy.

You want to move to a value added, knowledge based economy.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
FUnny that is what the head of the Fraser Institute said about 15 years ago. He too couldn't explain what we were to do for jobs for the 90% of the population that doesn't have or wish to obtain a degree in bioengineering.
And where exactly do you plan on marketing all this knowledge? Willileaks won't pay you much for your working drawings.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
FUnny that is what the head of the Fraser Institute said about 15 years ago. He too couldn't explain what we were to do for jobs for the 90% of the population that doesn't have or wish to obtain a degree in bioengineering.
And where exactly do you plan on marketing all this knowledge? Willileaks won't pay you much for your working drawings.

First, the Fraser Institute is a hot mess of stupid.

Second, stop peddling fossil fuels.

You're just making the hurt longer.