The free world has lost its leader

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
don't get all mad now you guys. :lol:


The free world has lost its leader. In the absence of a vigorous American foreign policy, Canada's Stephen Harper supplied his own. For the better part of a decade, he energetically championed Western interests. He was serious about fighting terrorism, keen on free trade and prepared to deploy proportionate force in defense of freedom.


His defeat in last week's Canadian general election will be felt far beyond that sparse, chilly country. When other Western leaders fretted about Israel's 2006 Lebanon war, he gave his full backing to the Jewish state. When others dithered over Putin's invasion of Ukraine, he led international condemnation. Obliged to meet Vladimir Putin at a summit meeting, he was admirably curt: "I guess I'll shake your hand, but I have only one thing to say to you: Get out of Ukraine."


Canada, like most countries, partly defines itself with reference to what it isn't; but Harper was uncomplicatedly pro-American and pro-British. In his first overseas speech as prime minister, he told a London audience how glad he was that his was a common-law, Anglosphere nation. As a matter of historical fact, this might not seem especially radical; but, my goodness, what a refreshing break from the line taken by previous Canadian leaders, namely that their country was a happy multiculti fusion of First Peoples and Acadians and Vietnamese boat people.


The free world has lost its leader | Washington Examiner
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Not to worry. Long before the next election is due all thinking people will realize the error of their ways.

Correction: Thinking people already know trudowe is going to be a disaster. Unfortunately we are far outnumbered.
 

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
The free world has lost its leader



The free world has lost its leader. In the absence of a vigorous American foreign policy, Canada's Stephen Harper supplied his own. For the better part of a decade, he energetically championed Western interests. He was serious about fighting terrorism, keen on free trade and prepared to deploy proportionate force in defense of freedom.

His defeat in last week's Canadian general election will be felt far beyond that sparse, chilly country. When other Western leaders fretted about Israel's 2006 Lebanon war, he gave his full backing to the Jewish state. When others dithered over Putin's invasion of Ukraine, he led international condemnation. Obliged to meet Vladimir Putin at a summit meeting, he was admirably curt: "I guess I'll shake your hand, but I have only one thing to say to you: Get out of Ukraine."

Canada, like most countries, partly defines itself with reference to what it isn't; but Harper was uncomplicatedly pro-American and pro-British. In his first overseas speech as prime minister, he told a London audience how glad he was that his was a common-law, Anglosphere nation. As a matter of historical fact, this might not seem especially radical; but, my goodness, what a refreshing break from the line taken by previous Canadian leaders, namely that their country was a happy multiculti fusion of First Peoples and Acadians and Vietnamese boat people.

Why did Harper lose so badly? The Canadian Right got its second-lowest share of the vote since 1968, and can't console itself with the thought that it was beaten by opponents whom it had dragged onto its own ground. Bill Clinton and Tony Blair had to meet their Right-wing rivals half way on many policy issues. But Justin Trudeau, the new Canadian PM, is like a depilated Occupy protester: pro-tax, anti-business, pro-pot, anti-America.

From an outsider's perspective, it seems mystifying. Canada was the best-performing major economy in the world, the only G7 state to come through the downturn without a downturn. It's true that the recent drop in commodity prices caused a slowdown, but the big picture remained positive. Taxes were falling more rapidly than at any time in the nation's history. Crime rates were at a record low. Illegal immigration had been curtailed, with the result that legal immigrants were grateful, patriotic and — unusually — happy to vote for the Right.

It won't do to argue that Canada is a naturally liberal country. Conrad Black used to speak of his countrymen as "English-speaking Scandinavians." In fact, both Scandinavia and Canada went through a teenage socialist phase from the late 1960s to the late 1990s, and then snapped out of it.

Until Pierre Trudeau, the new PM's father, Canadian immigration policy was based on keeping combined provincial and federal taxes below the U.S. equivalent, so as to compensate for the rougher climate. Before the goody-two-shoes, pantywaist, demilitarized Canada of the 1970s, Canadians were a famously tough people. Eisenhower used to remark (in private, obviously) that, man for man, they were the finest soldiers under his command. Harper believed, with justice, that he was returning his countrymen to their traditions.

What, then, was the problem? Put simply, Canadians had tired of their leader. Leftists, naturally, called him a hater, a Tea Partier, an Islamophobe, yada yada. But, more significantly, Tory pundits would remark on his "coldness" and "remoteness." A typical column in the right-of-center National Post — the newspaper founded by Conrad Black — blamed the defeat on "the nastiness of Tory politics under Harper, the mindless partisanship, the throttling of backbench MPs."

I'm not sure this is fair. In my scant dealings with Stephen Harper, I found him courteous but shy — a common Canadian combination. But it was widely believed. Not for the first time, a great leader, with immense achievements, stayed on for one election too many. It happened to Australia's John Howard, even to Britain's Margaret Thatcher.

Prolonged executive power is more than most politicians can take. Even the best and wisest leaders — and they don't come better or wiser than the two I've just mentioned — eventually lose touch. The pressures of modern government, the sleeplessness, the security cordons, the constant international summits make it hard to remain grounded.

Perhaps George Washington's single greatest act, in a lifetime of great acts, was to impose a term limit on himself, and thus to set the standard for all his successors (except the narcissistic FDR). Term limits are the surest way to stop your leaders from becoming power-crazed.

Sadly, term limits are no defense against the emergence of political dynasties — a nasty habit that has now spread from the United States to its northern neighbor. That, though, is another story.

source: The free world has lost its leader | Washington Examiner
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Free? Nothing in the universe is free. There's a law in science that covers this: Newton's 3rd law states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. IOW, there is a cost to everything. hehe

Anyway, as the dude is not dead, I am sure his pension and a new job will comfort him enough.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
That is a lovely tribute to Mr. Harper. Thank you.

Careful, it might go to his head, but basically you are right. There's no doubt he probably has a couple of "rough edges" in the P.R. department but as far as procedure goes he mainly knew what he was doing. I don't see any reason to molly coddle dangerous criminals or encourage terrorists. I also agree with the tax schedule- he put $2000 a year in our pockets. He also has the right attitude toward the refugees. Again your wisdom is obvious!
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Careful, it might go to his head, but basically you are right. There's no doubt he probably has a couple of "rough edges" in the P.R. department but as far as procedure goes he mainly knew what he was doing. I don't see any reason to molly coddle dangerous criminals or encourage terrorists. I also agree with the tax schedule- he put $2000 a year in our pockets. He also has the right attitude toward the refugees. Again your wisdom is obvious!

Harpler was and is an enemy of Canadian values and in the near future I hope to see him charged with treason.This country will never be fixed until and unless that is done.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
That is a lovely tribute to Mr. Harper. Thank you.
Yes it was wasn't it, however, I'm a bit concerned over the taste of a bit of vomit in my mouth after reading the OP.

Harpler was and is an enemy of Canadian values and in the near future I hope to see him charged with treason.This country will never be fixed until and unless that is done.
Off to the Hague and then we will go from there. I still think he should be sent to the Ukraine or Syria for a decade or so.
 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars
I have to admit being out of touch I've never heard of this Harper fellow . If anyone asked me who was in charge up there I would have said Trudeau. I'm pretty ignorant concerning my neighbor.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Harpler was and is an enemy of Canadian values and in the near future I hope to see him charged with treason.This country will never be fixed until and unless that is done.

What did he do to it and who is worse off? Some gun totin' drug pusher maybe! :)


You're hilarious today, Cliffy! :) :)

They should arrest and charge you for Welfare Fraud... you're suppose to be out looking for a job not spending 24/7 online you damn commie pinko!

For your information I believe Cliffy is an Old age pensioner. :)
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
What did he do to it and who is worse off? Some gun totin' drug pusher maybe! :)

Where are our fighter aircraft? Why are they there? Who made the decisions? How much did it cost to do nothing other than get us in the big war? Why did his government sign a trade agreement that Canadians are not allowed to read? Where's the democracy? Where's the transparancy? Where's the money? Where's the interogator? Where's the phone book? What's going to happen? I think you would have been just as happy with an ape elected to the PMs office this last retrograde decade. You are worse off, we all are. War is expensive I hope they don't take your cheaque to cover motor oil for tanks or propelloars for our Messerschmittins. You ruined this country. right wingbastard nut.


Boomer hates old people.