Supreme Court dismisses Harper's appeal as Niqab ban deemed Unlawful

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Harper breaking laws again?

Shocking.


Court dismisses federal appeal over niqab at citizenship ceremonies | National Newswatch
National Newswatch

Zunera Ishaq talks to reporters outside the Federal Court of Appeal after her case was heard on whether she can wear a niqab while taking her citizenship oath, in Ottawa on Tuesday, September 15, 2015. THE CANADIAN PRESS/ Patrick Doyle

OTTAWA - A Federal Court of Appeal panel has dismissed a government appeal over a ban on face coverings at citizenship ceremonies.

The three justices ruled from the bench, saying they wanted to proceed quickly so that Zunera Ishaq, the woman who initially challenged the ban, can obtain her citizenship in time to vote in the Oct. 19 federal election.

Ishaq, a 29-year-old woman with devout Muslim beliefs who came to Ontario from Pakistan in 2008, refused to take part in a citizenship ceremony because she would have to show her face.

The Harper government's rule banning face coverings at such ceremonies was earlier found unlawful by the Federal Court.

Justice Department lawyer Peter Southey argued unsuccessfully that the lower court justice made errors in his original decision to overturn the ban.

Appeal Justice Mary Gleason said the court say no reason to interfere with earlier ruling

The ban on face coverings sparked a bitter debate in the House of Commons when it was first announced.

The Canadian Press

Court dismisses federal appeal over niqab at citizenship ceremonies | National Newswatch
 

Glacier

Electoral Member
Apr 24, 2015
360
0
16
Okanagan
The niqab is not even a religious headdress. Rather, it's a political statement telling the Kafirs that Islam will dominate.

 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
Wait till women have to fight for the right NOT wear one.

Nah... jk... when that time comes there will be too much fear.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Glad to see you guys endorsing something which should have obviously been illegal from the start.

Keep the salt coming.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Funny how you can't tell the difference between something regarding security and something that does not.

Funny.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Are you implying the citizenship ceremony should require the removal of the niqab for security reasons?

Why don't you just say that instead of being so coy about it coward?