Hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs gone under Harper’s Conservatives

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs gone under Harper’s Conservatives

The NDP is calling on Stephen Harper’s Conservatives to take immediate steps to support Canada’s manufacturing sector after an internal report from Industry Canada suggests that some manufacturing jobs lost during the recession could be lost forever. The report also highlights that Ontario has lost 212,000 manufacturing jobs in the last decade and Québec has lost nearly 100,000.

“While the Conservatives pretend everything is rosy, the report indicates that some of the manufacturing jobs that Canada has lost will be gone forever," said NDP Industry critic Peggy Nash (Parkdale – High Park). “The Conservative’ plan just isn’t working.”

Thanks to NDP pressure, the Conservatives finally implemented the New Democrats’ proposal to extend the accelerated capital cost allowance, but there are further steps that can be taken right now to support Canada’s manufacturing heartland – steps like creating an innovation tax credit to support jobs-boosting investments in research and development.

"The Industry Canada report confirms that the Conservatives’ unbalanced economic policies are hurting our manufacturing sector and put at risk the hundreds of thousands of Canadians it employs," said Nash. “This is unacceptable.”

Canadians deserve better and Tom Mulcair has a concrete plan to rebuild Canada’s manufacturing sector and protect good jobs.

source: Hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs gone under Harper’s Conservatives « Canada's NDP

...................................

Harper put all his eggs in one basket, OIL!!

Saskatchewan's economy will also fail as China's economy fails, so does Sask's, not buying any more metals.

The fact that Canada under NAFTA has basically allowed for all their manufacturing to leave Canada and move to China, Mexico and other points, is evident now as Canada slips into a recession, and quite possibly a small depression.
 

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,843
92
48
Dipper propaganda. The real loss of jobs is the Lib policy in ON.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,288
11,381
113
Low Earth Orbit
What kind of manufacturing jobs? Pulp and Paper? Things made from Canadian forest products? Steel? Foundry? Polymers? Heavy equipment?

Aren't those eco killing jobs?

Give a full list.

I'm surprised some of those industries tanked by liberals lasted into the Harper era.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
This is a repercussion of NAFTA, which existed before Harper, but his government pushes free trade so this one of the consequences of that.
 

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
So did Martin and Chretin... Haven't heard Mr Neckbeard or Justine speak out against it

Which clearly says Canada needs a new federal party.. the Labor Party.

Focus on Canadian Jobs, Canadian Sovereignty, scrapping NAFTA and boosting the middle class.


Also, if you think the NAFTA push back is just Canadian, why do you think Donald Trump is so popular.. anti-China, anti-Mexico

This race to the bottom has had a devastating effect on America’s manufacturing base. Pre-NAFTA, the U.S. had 16.8 million people employed in the manufacturing field. By 2007, that number was down to just 13.9 million. That accounts for over 20 percent of America’s manufacturing jobs over the past 14 years. Those good-paying manufacturing jobs have been replaced by low-paying service sector jobs with little or no benefits.

 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Which clearly says Canada needs a new federal party.. the Labor Party.

Focus on Canadian Jobs, Canadian Sovereignty, scrapping NAFTA and boosting the middle class.


Also, if you think the NAFTA push back is just Canadian, why do you think Donald Trump is so popular.. anti-China, anti-Mexico

This race to the bottom has had a devastating effect on America’s manufacturing base. Pre-NAFTA, the U.S. had 16.8 million people employed in the manufacturing field. By 2007, that number was down to just 13.9 million. That accounts for over 20 percent of America’s manufacturing jobs over the past 14 years. Those good-paying manufacturing jobs have been replaced by low-paying service sector jobs with little or no benefits.

What do you think will be the reaction to Canadian protectionist policy?

We are an export nation, so you can wave bye-bye to being competitive in terms of competitiveness in oil, lumber, agri sector, manufacturing (a joke already), fisheries and mining to name a few. Might want to forget about any foreign investment into Canada while you're at it.

... And the extra kick in the nuts you can look forward to is that there will be no such thing as cheap consumer goods... Your cost of living just went up.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,288
11,381
113
Low Earth Orbit
A massive potash market just opened up thanks to Harper, What did we do without China for the past 50 years and China already ordered a huge pile yet to be delivered that keeps everything intact. The world needs to eat. Canadian fertilzer feeds billions. It's one of few strategic assets.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Manufacturing is an export business though.

If you have states like China and Mexico that are allowed to impose unfairly cheap labour, then international free trade automatically benefits them over other states with manufacturing.

We could compete though.

We would just have to pay our manufacturing base $1/hour and we would be doing great.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Manufacturing is an export business though.

If you have states like China and Mexico that are allowed to impose unfairly cheap labour, then international free trade automatically benefits them over other states with manufacturing.

We could compete though.

We would just have to pay our manufacturing base $1/hour and we would be doing great.

What s simple little world you live in
 

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
What do you think will be the reaction to Canadian protectionist policy?

We have a small population and that workforce can not compete against the 3 billion workforce of The USA, China and Mexico, some of those countries have no environmental controls for companies and/or minimum wages.

Canada has always successfully traded, even with tariffs in place. But that protected Canadian jobs from predatory countries like China.

Argentina is considered the most protectionist country in the world, yet their middle class has been growing.

World Bank: Middle class now rivals poor in Argentina - BuenosAiresHerald.com
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
We have a small population and that workforce can not compete against the 3 billion workforce of The USA, China and Mexico, some of those countries have no environmental controls for companies and/or minimum wages.

Canada has always successfully traded, even with tariffs in place. But that protected Canadian jobs from predatory countries like China.

Argentina is considered the most protectionist country in the world, yet their middle class has been growing.

World Bank: Middle class now rivals poor in Argentina - BuenosAiresHerald.com

All you'll be doing is punishing Canada's smaller population and enviro controls are not part of NAFTA

As far as Argentina is concerned, they are having some pretty big troubles right now, but if you want to compare, make almost 3 times more (wages) per month than in Argentina.

Chances are that the article you refer to means that the middle class is dropping closer to the poor rather than bringing the poor up into the middle class. No surprise when you consider that Argentina has a 44% payroll tax and a VAT of 21%.

... Still sound like a model you want to follow?