Mayor John Tory calls for updated bylaw to regulate Uber, taxis

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
The best conservative ever.


Mayor John Tory calls for updated bylaw to regulate Uber, taxis

Mayor John Tory says modernized laws that would regulate Uber car and limousine services are now “priority number one” for the city.

His call for a single municipal bylaw to oversee all ground transportation, including both taxis and Uber, follows a court ruling that shut down the city’s attempt to ban the mobile app-based service on Toronto streets.

“The Ontario Superior Court ruling was clear: our bylaws, which were written many years before technology had advanced to where it is today, simply do not adequately capture the operations of companies like Uber,” Tory said at a city hall press conference Monday. “And, as a result, what we have to today is not a level playing field.”

The mayor said the city is still considering whether to appeal the judge’s decision. An appeal would need to be authorized by council.

In the meantime, Tory called for an expedited review to start immediately. Major reviews of the taxi industry have consumed city hall, but a renewed push to reverse recent changes was put on hold while council awaited the Uber judgment.

Tory said the plan is to have a new bylaw before council this fall.

“We need to level the playing field,” he said. “We need to have everybody who wishes to participate in this industry doing so within the law, and that means the law is going to have to be changed.”

The mayor said the UberX service, which allows anyone to hail a non-taxi driver for cheaper fares, is operating “outside the current law.” That practice has elicited concerns over both safety and proper insurance from critics in the taxi industry.

He said that model is not “sustainable” and that he would expect enforcement, pending the creation of a new bylaw.

“What we need is one bylaw that applies without question to everybody,” Tory added.

While it was the city that launched the court challenge, the mayor has been sympathetic to Uber’s cause; he said it’s up to the city to update outdated bylaws to acknowledge changes in technology. He said Monday he does not favour any one company and wants a regime that promotes “fair, equitable, convenient, safe service.”

A new bylaw should recognize fair competition and put passengers first, he added.
The mayor called Monday’s meeting, which brought together both sides, significant.

Uber Canada general manager Ian Black said Monday that Uber is looking forward to working with the city on a new bylaw regime, while reiterating that all Uber services are operating legally, according to the Superior Court. (Uber operates different car services: one service enables customers to hail licensed cabs; UberX, another service, allows them to hail non-taxi drivers for cheaper fares.)

“I think it was a good meeting to get all the opinions out around the table,” Black said. “We will continue to serve the City of Toronto, especially during the Pan Am Games.”

While taxi industry representatives said they were encouraged that Tory is calling for enforcement when it comes to UberX, the mayor’s comments appear to have been misinterpreted to mean the service is currently operating illegally.

Tory did not make that distinction, nor did Justice Sean Dunphy’s ruling make such a finding, instead saying that Uber has not breached the city’s current bylaws.

Those opposing Uber have said police and bylaw enforcement officers are not properly enforcing city rules or the Highway Traffic Act. “Nobody is outside the law,” said taxi fleet operator Sam Moini, who added that taxi services expect the current bylaws and Highway Traffic Act to be enforced.

“We can’t expect the wild, wild west to be occurring as it is right now.”
Beck Taxi’s Kristine Hubbard said the company is still concerned about Uber operating unlicenced services at “major” risk to passengers.

“It’s great, all these promises of 'We’ll get it done really quickly,' but during that period Uber will continue to grow and taxi drivers will continue to suffer,” said Hubbard. “How is that a compromise?”

But police spokesperson Mark Pugash pointed to recent Highway Traffic Act charges against Uber drivers, which were dropped.

“We had tickets under the HTA and the courts, the prosecution and the defence agreed that it didn’t come within the Highway Traffic Act,” he said.

“The courts made it clear that it was not the way to go.”

The city’s municipal licensing and standards division says it continues to enforce the current bylaws with respect to UberX, whose drivers it says are still operating as “unlicensed limousine drivers.”

The taxi industry, calling Tory’s push for new rules a positive first step, said Monday that earlier plans to stage a strike during the Pan Am Games have been “taken off the table.”

Tory said he has received assurances that service will operate normally during the weeks-long competition.

http://m.thestar.com/#/article/news...or-up-to-date-law-to-regulate-uber-taxis.html
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,614
2,362
113
Toronto, ON
If taxis weren't overcharging rip off artists, there would be no need for uber. Regulation = over inflated fares.

And what exactly is uber doing illegally? What exactly are they going to be charged with?
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
If taxis weren't overcharging rip off artists, there would be no need for uber. Regulation = over inflated fares.

And what exactly is uber doing illegally? What exactly are they going to be charged with?

There is a mandatory fee that taxis are legislated to charge as a minimum so there isn't an even playing field.

This is a problem worldwide as governments begin to regulate the industry further.

Which they should be doing because the trend is that we are trying to move away from the dangers of free markets.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,614
2,362
113
Toronto, ON
There is a mandatory fee that taxis are legislated to charge as a minimum so there isn't an even playing field.

This is a problem worldwide as governments begin to regulate the industry further.

Which they should be doing because the trend is that we are trying to move away from the dangers of free markets.

Over regulation leads to abuses and black markets. In this case, what is the purpose of a minimum fare? It would seem to be creating a demand for uber and preventing legitimate cabbies from competing.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,381
11,440
113
Low Earth Orbit
I know what they need. Well sir there is nothing on earth like a genuine, bonafide, electrified, six-car monorail. What did I say? Monorail! What's called? Monorail. That's right. Monorail.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Why haven't taxi companies been crying out against designated drivers and Project Red Nose? Uber is risky business - especially if there's an accident with injury in a vehicle for hire without insurance coverage for said purpose.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,381
11,440
113
Low Earth Orbit
Why haven't taxi companies been crying out against designated drivers and Project Red Nose? Uber is risky business - especially if there's an accident with injury in a vehicle for hire without insurance coverage for said purpose.

At Christmas they have all the business they can handle as it is.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Over regulation leads to abuses and black markets. In this case, what is the purpose of a minimum fare? It would seem to be creating a demand for uber and preventing legitimate cabbies from competing.

This is not over regulation by any stretch and there are serious consequences to safety and insurance when you have unlicensed 'taxi drivers' using their personal vehicle for commercial use.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,614
2,362
113
Toronto, ON
This is not over regulation by any stretch and there are serious consequences to safety and insurance when you have unlicensed 'taxi drivers' using their personal vehicle for commercial use.

But this does not change the fact that inflated fares keep demand for uber high.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
This is not over regulation by any stretch and there are serious consequences to safety and insurance when you have unlicensed 'taxi drivers' using their personal vehicle for commercial use.
Wuss.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
I have no idea how cabbies in TO are paid - but in the town I hacked in, it was a 60/40 split where 60 pays the gas. Many nights I sat out there for $100 in fares, had to pretend annoying drunks were funny, then had to fill the car