Taxpayer group urges Tories to stop pumping public money into partisan ads

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83



Taxpayer group urges Tories to stop pumping public money into partisan ads

Kady O'Malley, CBC News
A government waste-watching group once headed by Defence Minister Jason Kenney is calling out the federal government for using taxpayer money to pay for partisan ads.

Veterans Affairs ads that cost $4.3M fell flat with viewers: report
Ottawa adds another $11 million to ad budget as year-end nears
Ottawa's ads called a pre-election campaign funded by taxpayers
In a release issued Wednesday, Canadian Taxpayers Federation federal director Aaron Wudrick points to several recent ad campaigns that have been in heavy rotation, including the anti-pot messaging launched last year and commercials touting new tax cuts.

"These ads are all paid for with your tax dollars," he notes.

And while he acknowledges that, in some cases, such campaigns serve a "legitimate purpose" by providing the public with important information about available programs and services, that wasn't the case with the $2.5 million spent on ads for the Canada Job Grant — a program that, Wudrick points out in his release, "didn't even exist at the time."

"The reality is that for an incumbent government, the temptation to torque ads for partisan gain will always be great," Wudrick said.

"If a government can use public dollars to 'inform' Canadians by conveniently putting a positive spin on the governing party's policies at the same time, they probably will."

This, he says, "is not only a waste of precious resources — it's also an affront to fairness in a democracy."

"Further, it violates the democratic principle that public dollars shouldn't be directed towards partisan ends."

The federation wants Ottawa to establish an independent third party to vet proposed government advertising to ensure a non-partisan tone.

3rd party oversight needed: CTF

Wudrick points out that the Province of Ontario has had an independent ad review process since 2004.

"It's time for the Harper Conservatives to follow Ontario's lead and implement similar third-party oversight of its advertising," he concludes.

READ the full CTF commentary on taxpayer-funded ads here
The critique comes just days after Liberal finance critic Scott Brison blasted the Conservatives for spending millions on what he described as "wasteful and ineffective partisan ads."

He claimed the government has spent more than $750 million on ads since taking office in 2006.

In 2013, Liberal MP David McGuinty introduced a private members' bill to appoint a federal advertising commissioner, who would work within the Office of the Auditor General to review all proposed government advertising for potentially partisan content.

According to the most recent spending projections, the government recently added an additional $11 million to the available advertising budget for this year, which now totals $65 million.

Ad budget boosted

As reported by The Canadian Press last month, the bulk of that newly committed money is earmarked for four departments:

Finance, which got $3.5 million in additional cash to sell the government's much self-touted Economic Action Plan, including newly promised tax credits and benefits.
Defence, which received $3 million to continue its latest recruitment campaign.
Citizenship and Immigration Canada, which added $3 million to its budget for promoting its services to new Canadians.
Canadian Heritage, which will have $1.5 million to put together a new campaign to highlight the planned celebrations surrounding Canada's 150th anniversary in 2017.
On Tuesday, CBC News reported that a $4.3-million ad campaign launched by Veterans Affairs Canada last year was deemed "effective" by the department despite internal polling that revealed the ads were mocked and derided by many viewers.

Veterans Affairs ads that cost $4.3M fell flat with viewers: report
While the Conservatives will likely be able to dismiss Brison's complaint as a standard political attack, it might be more difficult to dismiss Wudrick's call for an outside review process, given the long-standing crosslinks between the CTF and the party.

In addition to Kenney, who served as the federation's CEO prior to his election to office in 1997, Conservative MP John Williamson was the organization's federal director for several years before signing on as Prime Minister Stephen Harper's director of communications in 2009.

Several former ministerial staffers, including one-time Kenney press secretary Candice Malcolm and ex-Harper aide Kevin Lacey have also worked with the CTF since leaving the Hill.

Neither Williamson nor the Prime Minister's Office have responded to requests from CBC News for comment on the CTF's call for a third-party review process of taxpayer-funded advertising campaigns.


Share this story

http://www.cbc.ca/m/news/politics/t...ping-public-money-into-partisan-ads-1.2999889
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Anybody that wants fiscal responsibility in government would be against the government spending taxpayer dollars to promote itself.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Sure... Those monies are raised mostly from the private sector, the Party can spend it as they see fit

Funny how that goes. If I donate money to a political party I get a tax credit. If I donate money to the Suzuki foundation I get a text credit. The harperites only care about one of those organizations using my tax dollars for propaganda
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Funny how that goes. If I donate money to a political party I get a tax credit. If I donate money to the Suzuki foundation I get a text credit. The harperites only care about one of those organizations using my tax dollars for propaganda

Don't use the tax credit if it bother's you so much... Hell, we'll take it one more step and eliminate tax credits for Suzuki Foundation too.

I'm good with that
 

relic

Council Member
Nov 29, 2009
1,408
3
38
Nova Scotia
Oh wait, I look forward to seeing those important,taxpayer funded flix about what torys have for breakfast, ****ers can't even tell the truth about that. Got in lots of product placement adds though. Christ
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
The claim here is that it is tax dollars that are funding these advertisements.

Oh well... Such is the bennie of being the gvt in power - you can 'advertise the programs' that have been developed and if the viewer somehow attached the message that the Conservative Party is the group that has delivered on it, well, that's just the way it goes

Oh wait, I look forward to seeing those important,taxpayer funded flix about what torys have for breakfast, ****ers can't even tell the truth about that. Got in lots of product placement adds though. Christ

We could do flix about the harm that comes of sexual assault, abuse and long term harm... Maybe Trudeau will even support using the details of the 2 Liberal MPs that assaulted the Dipper ladies as the example.

That make you happy?
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Don't use the tax credit if it bother's you so much... Hell, we'll take it one more step and eliminate tax credits for Suzuki Foundation too.

I'm good with that

Whether I use tax credit or not is irrelevant. The issue is that you either support using taxpayer dollars for political agendas or you don't. I don't.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,567
7,076
113
Washington DC
Whether I use tax credit or not is irrelevant. The issue is that you either support using taxpayer dollars for political agendas or you don't. I don't.

Sounds like room for a compromise. Allow unlimited private money for political agendas, and I'm sure the parties will forswear using public money.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Conservative MP billed taxpayers for event hosted by same anti-tax group he used to run






But that only begs the question: why did taxpayers send John Williamson to a Vancouver taxpayers conference?


And perhaps the most crucial question of all -- does Williamson have any sense of irony?




Would John Williamson say he's "living high on the hog at the taxpayers' expense"?


We know that's what the Conservative MP used to say about "people who fleece Canadian taxpayers" back when he was head of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. Would he say the same thing now?


PressProgress has discovered Williamson left taxpayers to pick up the tab for an all expenses paid trip to a 2014 Vancouver conference for conservative political activists that, ironically, had "less waste and more accountability from governments" as a central theme.


But that's not all. Guess who was hosting the event? The Canadian Taxpayers Federation -- the very same group Williamson himself used to run.


According to House of Commons documents detailing MP's travel expense claims, Williamson racked up a bill of nearly $3,000 for travel, accommodations and per diems during his 3-night stay in Vancouver "to attend a conference" between May 29th and June 1st, 2014:


House of Commons rules stipulate MP's travel "must be in the discharge of parliamentary functions." While MPs are permitted to attend conferences, these events are typically connected to their work as "standing and special committee members."


Williamson has been a member of the National Defence and Official Languages committees since 2013.


We also know Williamson wasn't the only Conservative MP at the anti-tax talk-a-thon:


The weekend featured sessions on campaigning, outreach, and "pushing back against organized labour," and included speakers such as former Canadian Alliance leader Stockwell Day, anti-labour activist Catherine Swift, and American Tea Party activist Grover Norquist.


Conference delegates capped off the weekend with a ritzy cocktail reception and "Rex Murphy Dinner" -- Murphy, the keynote speaker, reportedly dazzled the crowd with zingers like: "there are things so stupid that only a government could do it!"






Conservative MP billed taxpayers for event hosted by same anti-tax group he used to run
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
I think they all squander money on ads to fool the voters so over the long haul I would imagine it all evens out, while someone is getting rich. :) :)
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
Sounds like room for a compromise. Allow unlimited private money for political agendas, and I'm sure the parties will forswear using public money.
that's not a compromise at all...that's all about the rich pouring money in so the stupid buy their line
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
The problem is Justin and Steve are two of the same both supported Bill C-51 designed to
diminish the rights of citizens it has little to do with terrorism it merely advances the cause
of fear the only lever the Tories have left.
People are waking up and the land is restless people want change and Justin and Steve
are not the change they want