A Vancouver businessman has been paid millions of dollars in a secret settlement with the federal government after the Canada Border Services Agency wrongly accused him of exporting military technology to China in violation of export controls, a W5 investigation reveals.
The payout to Steve de Jaray of more than $10 million in a confidential settlement and the events leading up to his arrest are revealed in a W5 investigation airing tonight on CTV.
On April 29, 2010, de Jaray and his 26-year-old daughter, Perienne, who managed the U.S. operation, were charged with two counts of exporting controlled goods. A conviction on the charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.
That accusation and subsequent publicity surrounding the charges of contravening the Customs Act and the Export and Import Permits Act caused Steve de Jaray to lose his business — Apex Micro Manufacturing, based in Delta, B.C. — and his lavish home in a posh West Vancouver neighbourhood.
The charges, de Jaray noted, “effectively branded” him “an arms dealer and an international terrorist.”
With her arrest forever cited on the Internet, Perienne said her chances at landing job have been shattered. “I’m completely unemployable. Who would ever employ somebody who was branded a terrorist?”
De Jaray’s troubles with the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) began in December 2008 when it seized a Hong Kong-bound shipment of computer chips and circuit boards at Vancouver International Airport, insisting the items were military technology that could not be exported.
The shipment was an order for a subsidiary called Caliber Solutions for electronics used to tune motorcycle fuel injectors. The parts were being shipped to Kowloon, Hong Kong, where they would be assembled and sent back to North America.
“They thought . . . erroneously that these products were controlled products under the Canadian export control list,” de Jaray told W5 in an interview.
Documents obtained by W5 show that federal officials in the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) concluded that the computer chips were “military standard.”
The Department of National Defence (DND) claimed they were “related to U.S. Strategic Bombers,” and with this information in hand, the CBSA decided “this company has to be shut down.”
On Friday, Feb. 13, 2009, a CBSA SWAT team raided the Apex factory in Delta and de Jaray’s home.
“It was probably the worst day of my life,” de Jaray recalled. “At my door, I was greeted by 10 long-arms-drawn military-style CBSA soldiers with bulletproof vests . . . pushing themselves by me and handing me a piece of paper saying they had a warrant to search my home.”
De Jaray could not understand why he had been targeted given that the components he was shipping were openly available on the Internet and could be purchased anywhere, including China.
His lawyers, David Martin and Howard Mickelson, were left scratching their heads.
What was curious to us from the outset was not just that the investigation was so lacking that they could have got the charges so wrong, but it begged the question: how could that have happened,” Mickelson said.
W5 learned that the answer may be found in a meeting held in Ottawa in May 2008, seven months before de Jaray was targeted.
At that meeting, then-U.S. undersecretary of state Frank Ruggiero made it clear to those in attendance — officials from CBSA, the RCMP, CSIS, DND and DFAIT — that Canada would not get trade concessions on defence products unless Ottawa increased prosecution of illegal exports of U.S. military technology.
Ruggiero’s ultimatum was revealed in a secret American cable released by WikiLeaks, detailing the U.S. government’s unhappiness with Canadian enforcement. “. . . until the price to be paid for export control violations is the same in Canada as it is in the U.S. — prison — adversaries will persist in abusing Canada as a venue from which they can illegally procure and export U.S. defence technologies.”
For Canada, the stakes were high. At the time, it was buying American arms — giant C-17 cargo planes, Hercules aircraft, Chinook helicopters and drones. But the U.S. government was unhappy with security screening for Canadian defence contractors and Canadian exports of military technology.
“The undersecretary of state from the United States government not only required there be prosecutions as a condition of Canada being able to obtain trade concessions,” said Martin, de Jaray’s lawyer.
“But in addition, people had to be sent to jail in a manner consistent with what was occurring in the United States before the U.S. would even consider those trade concessions.”
Seen in that context, the internal emails building a case against de Jaray took on new meaning.
The CBSA declined W5’s request for an interview to discuss its role in the de Jaray case.
“The Privacy Act provides strict parameters on what the CBSA may or may not say about any one person, file, and/or entity,” communications director Patrizia Giolti wrote in an email. “We are bound by these parameters and may only speak to what is already in the public domain. As such, we are not in a position to accommodate an interview.”
This despite the fact that it was pointed out that the CBSA issued a news release on May 27, 2010, detailing the charges against de Jaray and his daughter, Perienne.
While his settlement is secret, de Jaray told W5 he wants a public investigation of his case.
“What I want is some answers, some accountability. I would like a public inquiry. Those who did this to me and my family, they need to be responsible.”
Ottawa pays $10M-plus to wrongly accused businessman | Toronto Star
The payout to Steve de Jaray of more than $10 million in a confidential settlement and the events leading up to his arrest are revealed in a W5 investigation airing tonight on CTV.
On April 29, 2010, de Jaray and his 26-year-old daughter, Perienne, who managed the U.S. operation, were charged with two counts of exporting controlled goods. A conviction on the charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.
That accusation and subsequent publicity surrounding the charges of contravening the Customs Act and the Export and Import Permits Act caused Steve de Jaray to lose his business — Apex Micro Manufacturing, based in Delta, B.C. — and his lavish home in a posh West Vancouver neighbourhood.
The charges, de Jaray noted, “effectively branded” him “an arms dealer and an international terrorist.”
With her arrest forever cited on the Internet, Perienne said her chances at landing job have been shattered. “I’m completely unemployable. Who would ever employ somebody who was branded a terrorist?”
De Jaray’s troubles with the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) began in December 2008 when it seized a Hong Kong-bound shipment of computer chips and circuit boards at Vancouver International Airport, insisting the items were military technology that could not be exported.
The shipment was an order for a subsidiary called Caliber Solutions for electronics used to tune motorcycle fuel injectors. The parts were being shipped to Kowloon, Hong Kong, where they would be assembled and sent back to North America.
“They thought . . . erroneously that these products were controlled products under the Canadian export control list,” de Jaray told W5 in an interview.
Documents obtained by W5 show that federal officials in the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) concluded that the computer chips were “military standard.”
The Department of National Defence (DND) claimed they were “related to U.S. Strategic Bombers,” and with this information in hand, the CBSA decided “this company has to be shut down.”
On Friday, Feb. 13, 2009, a CBSA SWAT team raided the Apex factory in Delta and de Jaray’s home.
“It was probably the worst day of my life,” de Jaray recalled. “At my door, I was greeted by 10 long-arms-drawn military-style CBSA soldiers with bulletproof vests . . . pushing themselves by me and handing me a piece of paper saying they had a warrant to search my home.”
De Jaray could not understand why he had been targeted given that the components he was shipping were openly available on the Internet and could be purchased anywhere, including China.
His lawyers, David Martin and Howard Mickelson, were left scratching their heads.
What was curious to us from the outset was not just that the investigation was so lacking that they could have got the charges so wrong, but it begged the question: how could that have happened,” Mickelson said.
W5 learned that the answer may be found in a meeting held in Ottawa in May 2008, seven months before de Jaray was targeted.
At that meeting, then-U.S. undersecretary of state Frank Ruggiero made it clear to those in attendance — officials from CBSA, the RCMP, CSIS, DND and DFAIT — that Canada would not get trade concessions on defence products unless Ottawa increased prosecution of illegal exports of U.S. military technology.
Ruggiero’s ultimatum was revealed in a secret American cable released by WikiLeaks, detailing the U.S. government’s unhappiness with Canadian enforcement. “. . . until the price to be paid for export control violations is the same in Canada as it is in the U.S. — prison — adversaries will persist in abusing Canada as a venue from which they can illegally procure and export U.S. defence technologies.”
For Canada, the stakes were high. At the time, it was buying American arms — giant C-17 cargo planes, Hercules aircraft, Chinook helicopters and drones. But the U.S. government was unhappy with security screening for Canadian defence contractors and Canadian exports of military technology.
“The undersecretary of state from the United States government not only required there be prosecutions as a condition of Canada being able to obtain trade concessions,” said Martin, de Jaray’s lawyer.
“But in addition, people had to be sent to jail in a manner consistent with what was occurring in the United States before the U.S. would even consider those trade concessions.”
Seen in that context, the internal emails building a case against de Jaray took on new meaning.
The CBSA declined W5’s request for an interview to discuss its role in the de Jaray case.
“The Privacy Act provides strict parameters on what the CBSA may or may not say about any one person, file, and/or entity,” communications director Patrizia Giolti wrote in an email. “We are bound by these parameters and may only speak to what is already in the public domain. As such, we are not in a position to accommodate an interview.”
This despite the fact that it was pointed out that the CBSA issued a news release on May 27, 2010, detailing the charges against de Jaray and his daughter, Perienne.
While his settlement is secret, de Jaray told W5 he wants a public investigation of his case.
“What I want is some answers, some accountability. I would like a public inquiry. Those who did this to me and my family, they need to be responsible.”
Ottawa pays $10M-plus to wrongly accused businessman | Toronto Star
