Canadian Museum for Human Rights has a free admission policy for aboriginal people

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
I'm sure that someone in the mouth-breathing progtard brain trust will have a good explanation for this. :lol:


It’s odd and a bit shocking, considering the museum supposedly exists to promote racial and cultural equality among Canadians.

Museum officials say all aboriginals, including First Nations, Metis and Inuit, can have free access to the museum if they produce identification proving their ancestral background. They can’t really tell us why they have this policy. When asked why one group of people has free access to the facility based solely on their race and culture and not others, museum officials were unable to provide a coherent answer.

“The admissions policy at the CMHR was developed, in advance of our opening, to align with that of other national museums such as the Canadian Museum of History, where Indigenous Peoples are also admitted at no charge,” museum spokeswoman Maureen Fitzhenry wrote in an email. “It is intended to help ensure Indigenous People have access to expressions of their culture.”
That’s not really an answer.

When I asked for further clarification, Fitzhenry wrote: “This policy is one way that we are striving to foster a respectful relationship between the Museum and Indigenous Peoples that acknowledges Indigenous rights relating to cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions.”

That’s not much of an answer, either.

How does free admission for anyone foster a respectful relationship? And why would the museum choose only aboriginal people in which to foster a respectful relationship in this way and not others?

It makes no sense. I could understand if free admission or a reduced price was available on the basis of ability to pay, regardless of race, culture, gender, religion, etc.

If the museum had devised a way to provide easier access to the museum for low-income Canadians through reduced fares or free admission based on need, I would heartily congratulate them. But that’s not what they’re doing here. They have created an admission policy based on race and culture. And they want people to produce I.D. to prove their ancestral background. That doesn’t sound very Canadian to me.

If museum officials are doing this because they want to reduce barriers for specific groups of people based on their race and culture, then what they’re doing is creating a negative stereotype.

To assume the price of admission — $15 for adults and $8 for children under 18 — is a barrier to anyone based solely on their ancestral background is inaccurate and patronizing.

If the museum is providing free admission to aboriginals because of the human atrocities they or their ancestors have endured, then they would have to give free admission to the many other races and cultures who have also endured human atrocities. But they’re not. So that can’t be the reason.

And if the museum is providing free admission to aboriginals simply to give them free access to a facility that celebrates their culture, then museum officials should have the same policies for other races and cultures, too. But they don’t.

Meanwhile, it’s unclear what happens if an aboriginal person shows up and doesn’t have I.D. to prove his or her ancestral background. After all, not all aboriginals have treaty or Metis cards. I asked museum officials about that, too, but they didn’t have much of an answer.

“We do ask that Indigenous visitors present identification in order to be admitted at no charge,” wrote Fitzhenry. “If people do not have identification, we are open to having conversations with them to explore alternatives.”

What does that mean? So it’s up to a clerk in the ticket booth to determine someone’s ancestry in order to establish whether they should get in for free?

The last time I checked, treating people differently based on their race or culture is called racism.

And it’s pretty sad to see Canada’s “human rights” museum stoop to such a disgraceful low.


CMHR promotes cultural inequality with free entrance policy | Columnists | Opini




anyone. anyone?









anyone?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I'm sure that someone in the mouth-breathing progtard brain trust will have a good explanation for this. :lol:


It’s odd and a bit shocking, considering the museum supposedly exists to promote racial and cultural equality among Canadians.

Museum officials say all aboriginals, including First Nations, Metis and Inuit, can have free access to the museum if they produce identification proving their ancestral background. They can’t really tell us why they have this policy. When asked why one group of people has free access to the facility based solely on their race and culture and not others, museum officials were unable to provide a coherent answer.
anyone?
Pick me, pick me, I'll be ever so good for ever so long. Remember when I said that about Colpy, (almost) the next thing he's posting from the Quran that puts them at Jacobs Well with the Samaritan woman. See, when I said, 'Let me help with that nothing went wrong.' What could possibly go wrong with me taking a closer look at it, with my good eye even? (if I can find the paper with that info on it)
For one, genetic profiling
For two, putting a group behind a fence so the can look at pictures of just how very long they have been behind a fence is actually GITMO kind of entertainment for the ones who run the 'facility' (rather than business for obvious reasons) The only civilized response is for the First Nations to charge these fukers (and all like them) triple to get into an actual smoke house.

It gets better (or worse depending which side of the fence one is on)
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
The admissions policy at the CMHR was developed, in advance of our opening, to align with that of other national museums such as the Canadian Museum of History, where Indigenous Peoples are also admitted at no charge,” museum spokeswoman Maureen Fitzhenry wrote in an email. “It is intended to help ensure Indigenous People have access to expressions of their culture.”
That’s not really an answer.

so why is that not really the answer?
 

skookumchuck

Council Member
Jan 19, 2012
2,467
0
36
Van Isle
so why is that not really the answer?

Simply because making exceptions for Natives because they are Natives is childish and ignorant. Why could they not arrange for persons of low income to have a pass? Would not be near as much work as most Senators do.
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
Simply because making exceptions for Natives because they are Natives is childish and ignorant. Why could they not arrange for persons of low income to have a pass? Would not be near as much work as most Senators do.

That would make the most sense. I'd assumed all museums had free admission or low cost admission for residence with low income.

I remember when the Royal BC museum was free...
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I'm sure that someone in the mouth-breathing progtard brain trust will have a good explanation for this. :lol:


It’s odd and a bit shocking, considering the museum supposedly exists to promote racial and cultural equality among Canadians.

Museum officials say all aboriginals, including First Nations, Metis and Inuit, can have free access to the museum if they produce identification proving their ancestral background. They can’t really tell us why they have this policy. When asked why one group of people has free access to the facility based solely on their race and culture and not others, museum officials were unable to provide a coherent answer.
How hard is to to say they are 'consultants' to the accuracy of the displays and as long as they leave a note in the suggestion box the fee they receive is justified and it is the same as admission price and small enough the (white) tax-man won't get an erection at seeing the amount. If they leave two suggestions they expect the follow-up to get more severe each time.

“The admissions policy at the CMHR was developed, in advance of our opening, to align with that of other national museums such as the Canadian Museum of History, where Indigenous Peoples are also admitted at no charge,” museum spokeswoman Maureen Fitzhenry wrote in an email. “It is intended to help ensure Indigenous People have access to expressions of their culture.”
That’s not really an answer.
It certainly does tell us at their present income level even this added expense means they would have to 'save up for it'.

When I asked for further clarification, Fitzhenry wrote: “This policy is one way that we are striving to foster a respectful relationship between the Museum and Indigenous Peoples that acknowledges Indigenous rights relating to cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions.”
It is meant to impress Muslims enough that they won't puish being the majority because the Indians were at one time also. Notice who owns the display and who is on display. Any quevstionvs?

That’s not much of an answer, either.
Sure it is, once you in a hole it doesn't fill itself in just because you stop shoveling.

How does free admission for anyone foster a respectful relationship? And why would the museum choose only aboriginal people in which to foster a respectful relationship in this way and not others?
Would you prefer they also get charged admission when they go to visit their relatives in prison or back on the Rez?

It makes no sense. I could understand if free admission or a reduced price was available on the basis of ability to pay, regardless of race, culture, gender, religion, etc.
How free if they wear cand-uff while on the property?

If the museum had devised a way to provide easier access to the museum for low-income Canadians through reduced fares or free admission based on need, I would heartily congratulate them. But that’s not what they’re doing here. They have created an admission policy based on race and culture. And they want people to produce I.D. to prove their ancestral background. That doesn’t sound very Canadian to me.
Show proof you aren't an Indian and pay full fare and quit worrying about the Indian behind you stealing something that is actually his in the first place.

If museum officials are doing this because they want to reduce barriers for specific groups of people based on their race and culture, then what they’re doing is creating a negative stereotype.
The Indians don't mind, now this can be the background for the 'Never Surrender, . . . again' posters on the fridge at home. Proof would be watch the reaction of the ones at the booth when you walk right on by. The comment most ofthen heard would be whitey and a 'Fukers are acting like they won the war.'

To assume the price of admission — $15 for adults and $8 for children under 18 — is a barrier to anyone based solely on their ancestral background is inaccurate and patronizing.
Seiing up a data base so the while pedos can look through a catalog now that there are tarffic cams and the BMW don't look out of place at a heritage site.

If the museum is providing free admission to aboriginals because of the human atrocities they or their ancestors have endured, then they would have to give free admission to the many other races and cultures who have also endured human atrocities. But they’re not. So that can’t be the reason.
Do Jews get free admission anywhere? (no need to expand on it unless requests come in)

And if the museum is providing free admission to aboriginals simply to give them free access to a facility that celebrates their culture, then museum officials should have the same policies for other races and cultures, too. But they don’t.
Having a token Indian around is not bad advertising for a museum that wouldn't even exist with their past being a disaster. Doing that is probably a war crime, as are Reservations no matter how much they are paid, or not paid in this case if they can't afford admission. Speaking of which, how many homeless and poor people are expected to go and look at how bad their life could get if they bitch even a little.

Meanwhile, it’s unclear what happens if an aboriginal person shows up and doesn’t have I.D. to prove his or her ancestral background. After all, not all aboriginals have treaty or Metis cards. I asked museum officials about that, too, but they didn’t have much of an answer.
Like ant Indian worth his salt would get in using the frond door to begin with. You only notice that they have been there, you know later when the list shows something is missing. In this case a display about them is probably safe. The newest band is the 'in and out in' one.

“We do ask that Indigenous visitors present identification in order to be admitted at no charge,” wrote Fitzhenry. “If people do not have identification, we are open to having conversations with them to explore alternatives.”
Have it be voice actyated, have the computer spit out a phrase in Indian english and if the person can mimic it in 3 tries the gate buzzes them in. (if it is a human make sure he isn't a white as you could come in on a horse and the button wouldn't get pushed.

What does that mean? So it’s up to a clerk in the ticket booth to determine someone’s ancestry in order to establish whether they should get in for free?
See above and not below.

The last time I checked, treating people differently based on their race or culture is called racism.
The Jews have made it a family business, a very profitable one.

And it’s pretty sad to see Canada’s “human rights” museum stoop to such a disgraceful low.
It's our new norm which is actually a return to the wat we were when Indians first entered the picture. We even created a museum that shows that process.

anyone. anyone?

anyone?
2nd time today I saw a stutter problem.

Just a rough draft so some of it might make you say, 'Wow.' , let me review it and some parys would change to a, 'Whoa' in all likelihood.

Other than the obvious one how am I doing? Mission complete or not?
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
That would make the most sense. I'd assumed all museums had free admission or low cost admission for residence with low income.

I remember when the Royal BC museum was free...

It was never free. Just part of your tax bill. Actually part of the tax bill of all the people that never went there as well.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
It was never free. Just part of your tax bill. Actually part of the tax bill of all the people that never went there as well.
That would mean the Indians get the money collected at the gates, so why take out of your pocket what goes back in later. Who much did they make so far in the building and decorating of that particular place.