MacKay and Prostitution /MacKay wants us to at least date people for sex


Count_Lothian
#1
For Peter MacKay to tell me that only if I date, and go through various courtship procedures acceptable by Peter MacKay can I have sex, is jerkwater, archaic,and just wrong.



I realize he is not alone but he is the front man.What exactly is he fronting?
He wants to perma ban prostitution. Calls it exploitative.

The supreme court's decision and tone on this subject is being completely ignored.
Are the conservatives just pandering to their rural vote? The Canadian Bible Belt as well?

Long time laws against prostitution have made it exploitative. Anyone in the industry will attest to that.

Making it legal is not just a Charter of Rights issue. It addresses the very fabric of one's concept of what sex is.
Who you may or not have it with, even if it is adult consensual practices. What you do in order to engage in the act.

The gay marriage issue is now part and parcel to our culture and we can now accept it in our families and schools and all facets of societies.
Like any bigotry it has become something of a shunning to not accept this.

For the government to tell me that only if I date, and go through various courtship procedures acceptable by Peter MacKay can I have sex, is jerkwater, archaic,and just wrong.

It is not immoral to meet someone in a coffee shop and through them just liking you ,you end up having sex with them .
It is not immoral to meet someone in a coffee shop and through buying them coffee and donuts they see you as some sort of provider and you end up having sex with them .
It is not immoral to meet someone in a coffee shop and after finding they will have sex with you for actual money ,you end up having sex with them . They can ask you for the dosh if you give it to them you end up in the courts.

So donuts and a coffee is ok For MacKay , straight out cash is a no no.


MacKay's morals are immoral to a thinking society. His concept of exploitation is completely off the mark.

If someone wants to have sex with people as a job , in a society that allows for that sort of thing, it is not exploitative.
If someone wants to have sex with people as a job , in a society whose government deems it immoral and exploitative, it still is not immoral or exploitative .

Who is to decide what is moral when it comes to the procurement of sex, between two consenting adults.

This concept of it's dirty if you actually pay for it and it's fine if you date for it is a political tactic .
It addresses and panders to a certain person in society with certain views. No one is telling them they should partake in an act with a sex worker.

Even Jesus Christ had a prostitute as a friend. No one knows if she stopped working after he saved her from the public stoning.

He accepted her.

MacKay seems to not understand there is a place for brothels in all societies.
A sexually satisfied person is a healthy person.
I would not take up a job washing men's urinals and emptying tampon receptacles, but some one does it. I deem this exploatative that someone has to do that to live.
I would not also want to engage in sex as a job , but someone does it.

It's not exploitative unless you deem it exploitative.

when I was 17 , and horny as hell and was basically only concerned with getting laid, I met a prostitute who did for me what I deemed a kindness in exchange for money.
Next morning I awoke and wasn't troubled for a few days. (LOL)

Dental hygienists have to go into filthy mouths and scrape tartar and bad hygiene off the mouths of people. For me that is more exploitative than having sex with people.

My doctor has to put his fingers up me bum by law every now and then. That is far more exploitative than consensual sex for money.

The law forces my doctor to do this act if he wishes to get paid by Health Canada and retain his job.


MacKay and these conservatives are using the ignorance of the rural vote and Bible punchers to exploit prostitution.

Who exactly are the Conservatives pandering to. We just found out and they admitted in Ontario that pandering to the mean isn't such a good idea. What are the federal conservatives doing if not the same or worse on this issue.

Having sex with two consenting adults is not dirty outside of marriage or dating.
Paying for sex is not exploitative , it is a necessity of a healthy society.

The government efforts should be a matter of education and keeping it out of the hands of criminals.
 
petros
+1
#2
Remeron. Why did you stop taking it?
 
Count_Lothian
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

Remeron. Why did you stop taking it?

I recall some sort of internet bravado you posted about going after the dreaded doc dred.
Have fun with that. Enjoy the most foolish of folly , the internet circle jerk. It makes one look small but hey who cares what those outside the circle think.

obviously this topic is way over your head so you do this BS.
 
captain morgan
Bloc Québécois
+2
#4
There's absolutely nothing stopping you right now from wandering-out this minute and picking up as many hookers as you want.

Really, what exactly are you bitching about?
 
Machjo
+1
#5
Another option is to learn self-restraint. Saves you money, protects you from dreaded viruses, prevents unwanted pregnancies, puts an end to exploitation, and puts you in a better position in the next world.

Just a thought.
 
petros
+1
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by Count_LothianView Post

I recall some sort of internet bravado you posted about going after the dreaded doc dred.
Have fun with that. Enjoy the most foolish of folly , the internet circle jerk. It makes one look small but hey who cares what those outside the circle think.

obviously this topic is way over your head so you do this BS.

Doc who? Long before my time.

Quote: Originally Posted by captain morganView Post

There's absolutely nothing stopping you right now from wandering-out this minute and picking up as many hookers as you want.

Really, what exactly are you bitching about?

Maybe it's Maybelline?
 
lone wolf
Free Thinker
+5
#7
MacKay was a male trollop before he married then suddenly developed morals? Belinda crossing the floor must really have screwed with his mind
 
Sal
No Party Affiliation
+6
#8  Top Rated Post
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolfView Post

MacKay was a male trollop before he married then suddenly developed morals? Belinda crossing the floor must really have screwed with his mind

but hey, he dated her secretly before she blew him
 
SLM
No Party Affiliation
+6
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by SalView Post

but hey, he dated her secretly before she blew him

off????

Lol
 
Sal
No Party Affiliation
+1
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

off????

Lol

baaaaaaahahah...that was good...
 
SLM
No Party Affiliation
+3
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by SalView Post

baaaaaaahahah...that was good...

What happens on Parliament Hill should stay on Parliament Hill, lol. Some things anyway.
 
captain morgan
Bloc Québécois
+4
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

What happens on Parliament Hill should stay on Parliament Hill, lol. Some things anyway.

Sometimes what happens on Parliament Hill stays on a blue dress.

Just sayin
 
SLM
No Party Affiliation
+3
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by captain morganView Post

Sometimes what happens on Parliament Hill stays on a blue dress.

Just sayin

That's Capital Hill dear.

We don't get 'scandals' like that. We're Canadian.
 
captain morgan
Bloc Québécois
+1
#14
I doubt that it's the case that it doesn't happen..... They just are smart enough to throw on a sweater before they go in front of the cameras
 
Locutus
-1
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by captain morganView Post

Sometimes what happens on Parliament Hill stays on a blue dress.

Just sayin

I think hildebeast could 'shout out' any stain.

 
Corduroy
+5
#16
Prostitutes should incorporate and donate to the Conservative party. That's the only way the Conservatives will see them as persons.
 
petros
+1
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by CorduroyView Post

Prostitutes should incorporate and donate to the Conservative party. That's the only way the Conservatives will see them as persons.

Or pay taxes like the rest of us persons.
 
Corduroy
+1
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

Or pay taxes like the rest of us persons.

I don't think DC will approve your monument to taxpayers.
 
DaSleeper
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

Doc who? Long before my time.

BTW He was at the time quite appropriately renamed Dreadful Nonsense....... lolydo!
 
Count_Lothian
+1
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

Or pay taxes like the rest of us persons.

They have been paying taxes for years. The smart ones anyway ,in order to invest and get mortgages and such.

As for the rest of us persons, this is exactly the point.
The life style and occupation of a prostitute brings a subtlety to the perspective.

You might not realize it but you did an us and them thing just now.

I tried to show that we as humans do all sorts of services to one another . I can't think of anything grosser than putting a finger up some guy's **** to see how his prostate is . So I label it exploitation. It actually isn't at all . but it is the same with MacKay's lack of intelligent observation on the matter.

Why does paying for sex with money become some tawdry affair as opposed to spending money for days on end on a person with the hopes of just getting laid.

The biggest gaffe of it all, is pay as you go sex is a total different experience than any other sex.

For those of us who do at times, we understand it in a different manner.
In all my years of using prostitutes not once did I feel dirty or did they feel exploited.

If there was an exploitative feel to it I suppose I would just give her the money and educate her on the fact this truly in not for her.

But in all my years never encountered anything like it.

MacKay is just using the situation to pander to the uninformed and those who William Blake would deem desire less.

Only those with little desire can make rules for those of us who have lots of desire.
 
WLDB
No Party Affiliation
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

What happens on Parliament Hill should stay on Parliament Hill, lol. Some things anyway.

It is a pretty fun location if you know it well.
 
petros
+2 / -1
#22
Since this is a crazy thread...

Ya know what? If I were Morty I'd have pushed Lee of the stool years ago. Swiff this, Bitch!


As you were...
 
gerryh
-1
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by Count_LothianView Post

In all my years of using prostitutes not once did I feel dirty or did they feel exploited.


So, what do you prefer, over 21 or under 18?
 
Walter
-1
#24
What reason, besides sex, is there for dating?
 
gerryh
-1
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by WalterView Post

What reason, besides sex, is there for dating?


Ya see Walter, for the true misogynists like lothian, women are only good for sex.
 
Count_Lothian
+1 / -1
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

So, what do you prefer, over 21 or under 18?

Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

Ya see Walter, for the true misogynists like lothian, women are only good for sex.

I'm going to to use this idiot to make a few points.
don't even think of flattering yourself moron , I'm using you for a better good is all.

The idiot mentioned in another thread that myself and a few friends who give money and care for a 17 year old were doing so to an under age person.

The consensual age of sex in Canada is 16. This girl we dote over intrigues us, not for her body or the sex we are teaching her to be able to share with people in the future, but for her love of life . Little things like a night out at The Rose Water Supper Club , dressed and made up to kill , is just something to behold. watching her learn how to order for herself is a joy. We dress her, and we teach her because she is willing to learn. she loves life and we will make sure she is a person of substance and knowledge.
Is this exploitation Mr. MacKay?



There is a woman who has caught my eye, and as luck would have it i am entering into a relationship of sorts with her.
She is thirty and a single mom. Her boy is 12. I've talked to her about our little project and she said she would have given anything for this to have happened to her. I'm thinking of caring for her financially and making her life more livable.
Would I be exploiting this person. She has done everything but come out and ask me.





As to my preference sexually.
Believe it or not women over 50 and around 65 turn me on the most. I won't say why , but they do. the idiot will have to get his jollies else where, this is for adults.
 
Count_Lothian
#27
Tonight I shall not be around much , due to a B'Day party for our little dove.
She turns 19 at mid night and an all nighter is in order. Yes she lied, but it was in order to stave off alcohol . She doesn't like it and she wanted us not to offer her any.
We all find it cute as hell.
 
captain morgan
Bloc Québécois
#28
Exactly how old are you Count?
 
Count_Lothian
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by captain morganView Post

Exactly how old are you Count?

The Count is well above the 50 mark and well below the 70 mark.

As a child I had a most beautiful maid in the house who was elderly. She lent herself to me when I was very young and left me something I can only describe as imprinting me with the desire for older women. The well endowed thigh , with a touch of cellulite.
The labia with that older aspect to them. the lower part of her belly , where child birthing is somewhat obvious.

It all was a challenge to have as a young man after she passed away. But now i've grown into a society of my fantasy.
 
captain morgan
Bloc Québécois
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by Count_LothianView Post

The Count is well above the 50 mark and well below the 70 mark.

Stepping out with a 19 y/o is a little creepy after understanding the logic behind the motivation
 

Similar Threads

28
MacKay blunders again....
by #juan | Dec 16th, 2011
8
Another one by MacKay
by Nuggler | Sep 24th, 2011
2
Time to lose MacKay
by BitWhys | Aug 3rd, 2007
2
No debate : Mackay, Hillier fall guy?
by Jersay | Mar 6th, 2006
no new posts