Veterans win disability clawback challenge

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Veterans win disability clawback challenge

A federal court has sided with a group of veterans who sued the government over the way it handles disability group insurance.

About 4,500 veterans across Canada joined a class-action lawsuit, claiming the government was unfairly clawing back money paid out for pain and suffering.

The case hinged on the meaning of the word "income."

The government claimed the long-term disability benefits are only meant to be a top-up to make sure members receive 75 per cent of the income they were making before they were released from the military.

The veterans, led by Nova Scotian Dennis Manuge, argued that the pension was not income but rather recognition for the service and sacrifice of members of the Canadian Forces.

In a decision released today, a federal court in Halifax ruled that the government's actions amounted to a breach of policy.

Veterans win disability clawback challenge - Politics - CBC News
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
I'm surprised it was resolved this quickly.

Props to our legal system.
 

bill barilko

Senate Member
Mar 4, 2009
5,865
491
83
Vancouver-by-the-Sea
Why is it that Govt treats military veterans so poorly?

Is it just the mindset of the kind of low life bureaucrat scum who work in those places or something more odious?
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Why is it that Govt treats military veterans so poorly?

Is it just the mindset of the kind of low life bureaucrat scum who work in those places or something more odious?

All Govts have. Look at the New Veterans Charter - Not 1 Vets org has said they agree with it - why - it screws the vet- UK brought in a similar charter before Canada did - It was screwed but they attempted to fix it. Still has problems but nothing compared to what we have with our so called Charter for Vets.
 

The Old Medic

Council Member
May 16, 2010
1,330
2
38
The World
Needless to say, this is NOT done yet. The Government will appeal, and if necessary, take it to the Supreme Court of Canada. If they lose there, they will just pass a law, allowing themselves the same rights.
 

9969

New Member
Dec 29, 2015
18
0
1
It's long overdue for these people, but lets not forget othrr Canadians.Those out there paying into a registered pension plan, anfd then get sick and disabled with a disease or injury, will have every dollar of PP disability deducted from their paid for pensions. Some people say that you shouldn't be able to stack your benefits and pensions but wait until they're 60, they can recieve their work pension and CPP? As statedearlier get sick, and the CPPD amount will be deducted. It wasn't right for the military, and it isn't right for those of us Canadians working who o get ill. Section 62.2 of the Bill of RIGHTS says those who pay ino registred pensions have no rights to seek equity. The miltary is a differenr schedual employee.
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
Veterans win disability clawback challenge

A federal court has sided with a group of veterans who sued the government over the way it handles disability group insurance.

About 4,500 veterans across Canada joined a class-action lawsuit, claiming the government was unfairly clawing back money paid out for pain and suffering.

The case hinged on the meaning of the word "income."

The government claimed the long-term disability benefits are only meant to be a top-up to make sure members receive 75 per cent of the income they were making before they were released from the military.

The veterans, led by Nova Scotian Dennis Manuge, argued that the pension was not income but rather recognition for the service and sacrifice of members of the Canadian Forces.

In a decision released today, a federal court in Halifax ruled that the government's actions amounted to a breach of policy.

Veterans win disability clawback challenge - Politics - CBC News

So, if I managed a pension plan for the private section, I could give my recipients a tax free status by writing "Your pension is intended to be recognition for the service and sacrifice that you made for your employer".
 

9969

New Member
Dec 29, 2015
18
0
1
If you have paid the premoiums, then you have expectations. If the government and/or the insurance companies take your money, then it's implied that the income stream will be there for you. Otherwise it is called fraud. The implication is clear, if they demand you pay the premiums, then they deduct from the income those monies you have paie the premiums for, it fraud.The argument for double dipping is moot, and is the notion of entitlements. If they don't want you to collect, then don't take the premiums.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
If you have paid the premoiums, then you have expectations. If the government and/or the insurance companies take your money, then it's implied that the income stream will be there for you. Otherwise it is called fraud. The implication is clear, if they demand you pay the premiums, then they deduct from the income those monies you have paie the premiums for, it fraud.The argument for double dipping is moot, and is the notion of entitlements. If they don't want you to collect, then don't take the premiums.

As told to me by a claims adjuster: Insurance companies are not in business to pay out claims. They are in business to make profits for their shareholders.
 

9969

New Member
Dec 29, 2015
18
0
1
Amen to taxslave, the profits are the incomes of disabled employees insurance companies and the PSSA are parasites. Read/sign e535 petitions canada
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
I JUST CHANGED MY MIND. I now support this decision.

This thread is deceiving because it doesn't mention that manuge's case was won on the fact that in divorce and child support cases, the veterans affairs disability pension was already being treated as NOT income.

If the CBC journalist had stated this in their article, I might have - much earlier - been more supportive of this ruling.
 

9969

New Member
Dec 29, 2015
18
0
1
Every single Canadian out there working, should be equal under te laws of the land, but they are not. This was identified during the debate N/50 , in the 41st sitting of Parliament, 1st Session. It was during this debate, which incidently laid the ground work for the Manuge, and the White vs cases. The average joe/jane who developes cancer, has a stroke, whatever and has to provide for a family, has absolutely no rights like the members of the military and RCMP nkw have. This isn't right, we are all Canadians, and should enjoy the prorections we have all paid or. Read e-petition e-535.

There isn't a normal peron out thrre who would sacrafice for their employer, country yes, otherwise..
 

9969

New Member
Dec 29, 2015
18
0
1
I agree, work place injuries are a form of sacrifice, but the real sacrifice comes 2 years after getting injured. Then everh dollar that youneed for expenses is taken away from the handicapped/disabled.