Tories accused of CBC 'witch hunt' by opposition

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Demanding CBC documents an abuse of power, MPs say

OTTAWA—A battle over access to internal documents at the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. has come to a head with opposition MPs accusing the Conservative government abusing their parliamentary powers to interfere with the court.

“This is not a partisan issue,” New Democrat MP Charlie Angus (Timmins—James Bay) said Thursday. “This is about the fundamental workings of Parliament.”


Conservative MPs on the Commons ethics committee passed a motion during a special closed-door meeting late Wednesday ordering the CBC/Radio-Canada to give them both the censored and uncensored versions of documents at the heart of a judicial dispute over access-to-information requests.

Heritage Minister James Moore gave the move a resounding endorsement.

“The truth is the CBC receives a lot of money. Our government has been clear: if it is going to receive that money then it needs to be accountable for it,” Moore said during question period in the Commons on Thursday.


New Democrat and Liberal MPs on the ethics committee boycotted the Wednesday meeting in protest.

The requests filed by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation and media outlets owned by Quebecor Inc. — whose QMI Agency and Sun News Network have been running an ongoing series of stories about the spending habits of what they call the “state broadcaster” — were for details about employee income, a fleet of vehicles, financing of any programs or films about the erstwhile Quebec Nordiques hockey team and the planning budget for the CBC/Radio-Canada 75th anniversary celebration.

A spokesman for CBC/Radio-Canada said the Crown corporation received a letter from the ethics committee clerk requesting the documents by Nov. 14.

“We are analyzing the motion and are looking for ways to satisfy the legitimate desire of the Committee to understand better our transparency and accountability, while protecting our journalistic independence,” Marco Dubé wrote in an email Thursday.


The CBC has exemptions under the federal Access to Information and Privacy Act that allows it to prevent the disclosure of records related to its journalistic, creative and programming activities — a power the federal information commissioner told the committee last month she believes is being applied too broadly, leading to what appears to be the arbitrary rejection of requests.


The CBC headed to the Federal Court of Appeals to argue that only a judge — rather than the information commissioner — should be able to see material the public broadcaster deems to fall under the exemption.

That is why opposition MPs are upset that Conservative MP Dean Del Mastro (Peterborough) went ahead with his motion ordering the CBC to allow committee members to secretly examine the uncensored documents.

They argue that it goes against what is called the sub judice convention — the tradition of Parliament reigning in its own powers a bit in order to avoid preventing someone from having a fair trial.

“Will the Minister of Justice explain our Constitution to (Del Mastro) and how it mandates a strict separation between the courts and Parliament, or is he part of this abuse of power as well?” Liberal MP Scott Andrews asked during question period on Thursday, which prompted the aforementioned response from Moore.


The NDP and the Liberals are awaiting independent legal counsel from parliamentary law clerk Rob Walsh before they participate in any more committee meetings.

Del Mastro argues the point of demanding the CBC produce the documents is to help Parliament review — and then perhaps redefine — the exemption without having to wait for the distant outcome of the Federal Court of Appeals case.

“Parliament wrote this exemption. Parliament may want to consider better defining it (before) this long and protracted battle that could go on for years and years with taxpayers footing the bill so that we could in fact see operations that are in fact consistent with the spirit of the Access to Information Act moving forward and we can just put all this behind us,” Del Mastro said in an interview Thursday.


The Conservative Party of Canada recently surveyed its grassroots on whether taxpayers receive a good value or bad value for the money going to the public broadcaster and Angus argued the committee tactics are part of a larger Conservative campaign against the CBC.

“They decided to create a sense of enmity with the CBC and they are using their power at committee to engage in the witch hunt,” said Angus.

Del Mastro disagreed.

“I think our government has been consistent with its support of the CBC,” Del Mastro said.
The CBC receives $1.6 billion from federal coffers this year and is facing a 5 to 10 per cent budget reduction as part of the government-wide spending cuts.

Del Mastro said CBC President Hubert Lacroix is scheduled to appear before the committee Nov. 17.

Canada News: Demanding CBC documents an abuse of power, MPs say - thestar.com



Tories put CBC in the crosshairs

It was the CBC’s 75th birthday Wednesday, but at the weekly Conservative caucus meeting there was no cake.

There were no Conservative tributes to the public broadcaster in the House of Commons, no press releases, not even a wink, just an icy silence as the CBC filled the airwaves with vintage images of everything from Barbara Frum to Mr. Dressup.

In fact, as it enters its 76th year, the public broadcaster again finds itself under daily assault.
It may seem like it was always thus.

Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chrétien regularly feuded with the broadcaster and it has run afoul of federal governments for at least half a century.

But it has never been under siege like this.

The animosity toward the CBC from the government of the day is no longer whispered at cocktail parties or kept behind closed doors, but has bubbled up to the surface in strangely obsessive and mean-spirited ways.

The drip, drip, drip, assault has made the CBC a popular Conservative target, sitting up there with big union bosses or anyone who does not espouse fealty to the Royal Family.

Exhibit A would be the Parliamentary committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics.
Its existence may be a mystery to most Canadians, but it has been turned into the personal playpen of Conservatives who now appear to be usurping the role of the country’s courts in its zeal to force the CBC to release documents.

Both opposition parties have boycotted the committee, crying “abuse of power” because government members are demanding the CBC hand over documents while the broadcaster is still before the Federal Court of Appeal on the matter.

It is lost on no one in Ottawa that the charge is being led by Peterborough MP Dean Del Mastro, the parliamentary secretary to Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Thursday, Heritage Minister James Moore praised Del Mastro for his relentless pursuit of transparency and his demand that CBC be accountable for the money it receives.

But this phony war is not being fought in a committee room vacuum.

The Conservatives and the Sun News Network, a CBC competitor much friendlier to the government, appear to be working hand in glove.

Meanwhile, the “privatize’’ crowd within the Conservative caucus has not only been emboldened, its ranks have swelled.

They argue there are no conservative voices on the network, they point to its dwindling influence as evidenced by its declining viewership and they argue that its $1.1 billion in government funding gives it an unfair advantage over its private competitors.

“Your sense of news is one-sided,’’ New Brunswick MP John Williamson told CBC CEO Hubert Lacroix last week.

“Viewers are looking for a good debate and they are not getting it from The National.’’

But the privatize gang is, so far, largely talking to itself.

No one has properly thought through the consequences or the fierce pushback that would come with such a move, and it has never been hinted at by Moore.

The Conservatives ignore the fact that it was CBC technology that allowed the Prime Minister’s final visit to Afghanistan in May to be broadcast from Kandahar and it is CBC technology that allows him to beam his message to the rest of the country from the far North.

The CBC, to be sure, has done itself no favours with its prolonged battle with the information commissioner over the release of documents.

The scalpel is coming.

Lacroix says a budget cut would not deter the CBC from its goal of providing more national, regional and digital coverage going forward.

He says he might be slowed, so he should probably expect to move 10 per cent slower.
Moore might be the best friend the CBC has on the government side, but he has made it clear that the broadcaster will be cut like any other department.

His challenge might be holding it to 10 per cent.

Canada News: Tim Harper: Tories put CBC in the crosshairs
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,543
6,923
113
B.C.
Demanding CBC documents an abuse of power, MPs say

OTTAWA—A battle over access to internal documents at the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. has come to a head with opposition MPs accusing the Conservative government abusing their parliamentary powers to interfere with the court.

“This is not a partisan issue,” New Democrat MP Charlie Angus (Timmins—James Bay) said Thursday. “This is about the fundamental workings of Parliament.”

Conservative MPs on the Commons ethics committee passed a motion during a special closed-door meeting late Wednesday ordering the CBC/Radio-Canada to give them both the censored and uncensored versions of documents at the heart of a judicial dispute over access-to-information requests.

Heritage Minister James Moore gave the move a resounding endorsement.

“The truth is the CBC receives a lot of money. Our government has been clear: if it is going to receive that money then it needs to be accountable for it,” Moore said during question period in the Commons on Thursday.

New Democrat and Liberal MPs on the ethics committee boycotted the Wednesday meeting in protest.

The requests filed by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation and media outlets owned by Quebecor Inc. — whose QMI Agency and Sun News Network have been running an ongoing series of stories about the spending habits of what they call the “state broadcaster” — were for details about employee income, a fleet of vehicles, financing of any programs or films about the erstwhile Quebec Nordiques hockey team and the planning budget for the CBC/Radio-Canada 75th anniversary celebration.

A spokesman for CBC/Radio-Canada said the Crown corporation received a letter from the ethics committee clerk requesting the documents by Nov. 14.

“We are analyzing the motion and are looking for ways to satisfy the legitimate desire of the Committee to understand better our transparency and accountability, while protecting our journalistic independence,” Marco Dubé wrote in an email Thursday.

The CBC has exemptions under the federal Access to Information and Privacy Act that allows it to prevent the disclosure of records related to its journalistic, creative and programming activities — a power the federal information commissioner told the committee last month she believes is being applied too broadly, leading to what appears to be the arbitrary rejection of requests.

The CBC headed to the Federal Court of Appeals to argue that only a judge — rather than the information commissioner — should be able to see material the public broadcaster deems to fall under the exemption.

That is why opposition MPs are upset that Conservative MP Dean Del Mastro (Peterborough) went ahead with his motion ordering the CBC to allow committee members to secretly examine the uncensored documents.

They argue that it goes against what is called the sub judice convention — the tradition of Parliament reigning in its own powers a bit in order to avoid preventing someone from having a fair trial.

“Will the Minister of Justice explain our Constitution to (Del Mastro) and how it mandates a strict separation between the courts and Parliament, or is he part of this abuse of power as well?” Liberal MP Scott Andrews asked during question period on Thursday, which prompted the aforementioned response from Moore.

The NDP and the Liberals are awaiting independent legal counsel from parliamentary law clerk Rob Walsh before they participate in any more committee meetings.

Del Mastro argues the point of demanding the CBC produce the documents is to help Parliament review — and then perhaps redefine — the exemption without having to wait for the distant outcome of the Federal Court of Appeals case.

“Parliament wrote this exemption. Parliament may want to consider better defining it (before) this long and protracted battle that could go on for years and years with taxpayers footing the bill so that we could in fact see operations that are in fact consistent with the spirit of the Access to Information Act moving forward and we can just put all this behind us,” Del Mastro said in an interview Thursday.

The Conservative Party of Canada recently surveyed its grassroots on whether taxpayers receive a good value or bad value for the money going to the public broadcaster and Angus argued the committee tactics are part of a larger Conservative campaign against the CBC.

“They decided to create a sense of enmity with the CBC and they are using their power at committee to engage in the witch hunt,” said Angus.

Del Mastro disagreed.

“I think our government has been consistent with its support of the CBC,” Del Mastro said.
The CBC receives $1.6 billion from federal coffers this year and is facing a 5 to 10 per cent budget reduction as part of the government-wide spending cuts.

Del Mastro said CBC President Hubert Lacroix is scheduled to appear before the committee Nov. 17.

Canada News: Demanding CBC documents an abuse of power, MPs say - thestar.com



Tories put CBC in the crosshairs

It was the CBC’s 75th birthday Wednesday, but at the weekly Conservative caucus meeting there was no cake.

There were no Conservative tributes to the public broadcaster in the House of Commons, no press releases, not even a wink, just an icy silence as the CBC filled the airwaves with vintage images of everything from Barbara Frum to Mr. Dressup.

In fact, as it enters its 76th year, the public broadcaster again finds itself under daily assault.
It may seem like it was always thus.

Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chrétien regularly feuded with the broadcaster and it has run afoul of federal governments for at least half a century.

But it has never been under siege like this.

The animosity toward the CBC from the government of the day is no longer whispered at cocktail parties or kept behind closed doors, but has bubbled up to the surface in strangely obsessive and mean-spirited ways.

The drip, drip, drip, assault has made the CBC a popular Conservative target, sitting up there with big union bosses or anyone who does not espouse fealty to the Royal Family.

Exhibit A would be the Parliamentary committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics.
Its existence may be a mystery to most Canadians, but it has been turned into the personal playpen of Conservatives who now appear to be usurping the role of the country’s courts in its zeal to force the CBC to release documents.

Both opposition parties have boycotted the committee, crying “abuse of power” because government members are demanding the CBC hand over documents while the broadcaster is still before the Federal Court of Appeal on the matter.

It is lost on no one in Ottawa that the charge is being led by Peterborough MP Dean Del Mastro, the parliamentary secretary to Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Thursday, Heritage Minister James Moore praised Del Mastro for his relentless pursuit of transparency and his demand that CBC be accountable for the money it receives.

But this phony war is not being fought in a committee room vacuum.

The Conservatives and the Sun News Network, a CBC competitor much friendlier to the government, appear to be working hand in glove.

Meanwhile, the “privatize’’ crowd within the Conservative caucus has not only been emboldened, its ranks have swelled.

They argue there are no conservative voices on the network, they point to its dwindling influence as evidenced by its declining viewership and they argue that its $1.1 billion in government funding gives it an unfair advantage over its private competitors.

“Your sense of news is one-sided,’’ New Brunswick MP John Williamson told CBC CEO Hubert Lacroix last week.

“Viewers are looking for a good debate and they are not getting it from The National.’’

But the privatize gang is, so far, largely talking to itself.

No one has properly thought through the consequences or the fierce pushback that would come with such a move, and it has never been hinted at by Moore.

The Conservatives ignore the fact that it was CBC technology that allowed the Prime Minister’s final visit to Afghanistan in May to be broadcast from Kandahar and it is CBC technology that allows him to beam his message to the rest of the country from the far North.

The CBC, to be sure, has done itself no favours with its prolonged battle with the information commissioner over the release of documents.

The scalpel is coming.

Lacroix says a budget cut would not deter the CBC from its goal of providing more national, regional and digital coverage going forward.

He says he might be slowed, so he should probably expect to move 10 per cent slower.
Moore might be the best friend the CBC has on the government side, but he has made it clear that the broadcaster will be cut like any other department.

His challenge might be holding it to 10 per cent.

Canada News: Tim Harper: Tories put CBC in the crosshairs
Privitize it and let them swim or sink on its own.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
108,912
11,193
113
Low Earth Orbit
Why? I can name oodles of things that NEED to be axed to save you $5 a year (as if you'd ever see it).
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Accountability? Sure, just change the law that gives CBC the exemption from disclosing information pertaining to their programming in competitive markets. While we're at it, let's see those documents for the G20 spending in Muskoka-Perry Sound...oh wait, there are none. lol
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,591
2,336
113
Toronto, ON
If you removed the government funding and let them earn money on their own, then there would be no need for government interference.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,285
480
83
59
Alberta
My God! I did not think my position through thoroughly! How can we survive without those shows?

And what of Coronation..



Street, how will we live without this staple of Canadian programming.
 

The Old Medic

Council Member
May 16, 2010
1,330
2
38
The World
No agency that is financed largely, or completely, by the government should be allowed to keep ANY documents from being seen by that government.

I can't help but wonder what the CBC has to hide? Why don't they wish these documents to be seen by Parliament? Could it possibly be that there is some "unusual" spending going on that they simply could not justify if it became public?
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
If there is anything 'partisan' about this nonsense, it's the self-righteous and arrogant defiance by the CBC concerning who is requesting the access to information.

I would privitize the entire operation in a second. The ego deflation and reality of having to climb down from the ivory tower would sure cause those pricks to rapidly pursue an attitude adjustment.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
If there is anything 'partisan' about this nonsense, it's the self-righteous and arrogant defiance by the CBC concerning who is requesting the access to information.

So you're saying the CBC would reveal this information if the NDP or Liberals were requesting it?

I can't help but wonder what the CBC has to hide? Why don't they wish these documents to be seen by Parliament? Could it possibly be that there is some "unusual" spending going on that they simply could not justify if it became public?

I'm sure the CBC has their reservations about what they choose to reveal, but you do have to at least give them credit for having a legislative leg to stand on.

Accountability? Sure, just change the law that gives CBC the exemption from disclosing information pertaining to their programming in competitive markets. While we're at it, let's see those documents for the G20 spending in Muskoka-Perry Sound...oh wait, there are none. lol

Didn't you hear?

It's okay for Conservatives to destroy gun registration records without conflicting any law, but CBC needs to be privatized right away for their self-righteous defiance!

No.. I certainly don't see any partisan ideologies at work here. :lol:
 
Last edited:

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,285
480
83
59
Alberta
It is beyond obvious why the CBC does not want to reveal its records and it's not because we might find out the secret of their programming genius, but because it is a bloated bureaucracy.
 

relic

Council Member
Nov 29, 2009
1,408
3
38
Nova Scotia
The gov't wastes billions of dollars on stupid shyte,and you goomers bitch about the CBC.Don't fn watch it or listen to it and shut the hell up.Try bitching about crap subs,or jets we don't need or fake lakes,stuff that any sane person would see as useless,some{read lots} of people like the CBC.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,336
113
Vancouver Island
The only reason I can see for mother corp to want to hide its spending is that if other bureaucracies found out how much waste cbc can get away with without a public uprising they would all be clamoring for more money.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
22,847
7,790
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The gov't wastes billions of dollars on stupid shyte,and you goomers bitch about the CBC.Don't fn watch it or listen to it and shut the hell up.Try bitching about crap subs,or jets we don't need or fake lakes,stuff that any sane person would see as useless,some{read lots} of people like the CBC.


If the CBC became a public broadcast system (like PBS in the U.S.), then they'd
be self funded, and could tell the gov't to stuff their request where the sun doesn't
shine, and avoid the whole critic of their recieving gov't funding. That currently isn't
the case though.

The time of analog antenea broadcasting is closing, and satalite digital broadcasting
is upon us and has been for quite some time....so the arguement of "but who would
broadcast to the sparcely populated regions of the country?" is out the window, and
the same can be said with respect to satalite radio, etc...
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
108,912
11,193
113
Low Earth Orbit
Ron. You have to separate TV from radio. Currently CBC is investing heavily into FM and The CBC owns 20.2% of Sirius Satellite. That is a damn good thing.

When it comes to TV, CBC does have the right as a corporation, public or not to withhold some of it's financials from the public eye. It's none of Bell or Roger's biz what the CBC and it's customers have negotiated for advertising rates.

If you want to know how much they took in on Degrassi re-runs or Dragon's Den syndication then sure that is fine.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
22,847
7,790
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Ron. You have to separate TV from radio. Currently CBC is investing heavily into FM and The CBC owns 20.2% of Sirius Satellite. That is a damn good thing.

When it comes to TV, CBC does have the right as a corporation, public or not to withhold some of it's financials from the public eye. It's none of Bell or Roger's biz what the CBC and it's customers have negotiated for advertising rates.

If you want to know how much they took in on Degrassi re-runs or Dragon's Den syndication then sure that is fine.


So the current Gov't is going to request this info, and then release it to other
media outlets? I didn't get that from the O.P., but maybe I missed it. Guess
I'd best reread through the O.P.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
108,912
11,193
113
Low Earth Orbit
The Govt is the public. We're still some what of a Democracy aren't we?

So why did Harper appoint such schmucks to run the CBC in the first place?

Management

As a crown corporation, the CBC operates at arm’s length (autonomously) from the government in its day-to-day business. The corporation is governed by the Broadcasting Act of 1991, under a Board of Directors and is directly responsible to Parliament through the Department of Canadian Heritage. General management of the organization is in the hands of a president, who is appointed by the Governor General of Canada in Council, on the advice of the prime minister.
Is this guy asleep at the wheel?

Home