I often hear the term 'neocon' thrown around. What exactly does it mean? What does it imply? How often is it misused to polarize or offend?
Anyone want to throw their 2 cents into this before I have a chance to google it?
The term neoconservative was initially employed as a criticism against
proponents of American
modern liberalism who had "moved to the right".[3][4] Socialist Michael
Harrington coined the current sense of the term
neoconservative in a 1973 article concerning welfare policy.[5]
According to E. J. Dionne,
the nascent neoconservatives were driven by "the notion that liberalism" had
failed and "no longer knew what it was talking about."[6]
The term "neoconservative" was the subject of increased media coverage during
the presidency of George W.
Bush.[7][8] with particular focus on
a perceived neoconservative influence on American foreign policy, as part of the
Bush Doctrine.[9]
The term neocon is often used as pejorative in this context.
The first major intellectual to embrace the term, Irving
Kristol, is often dubbed the 'godfather' of neoconservatism. Kristol
wrote of his neoconservative views in the 1979 article "Confessions of a True,
Self-Confessed 'Neoconservative.'"[3]
His ideas have been influential since the 1950s, when he co-founded and edited
Encounter
magazine.[10] Another source was Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary magazine from 1960 to
1995. By 1982 Podhoretz was calling himself a neoconservative, in a New York
Times Magazine article titled "The Neoconservative Anguish over
Reagan's Foreign Policy".[11][12] Kristol's son, William
Kristol, founded the neoconservative Project
for the New American Century.
Obviously you got here before I did but I was nearly literally thinking the exact same things as what you've posted as soon as I saw the thread title.It's always used to polarize. People don't pigeon hole others into left or right unless they're looking to polarize, or lashing out. neocon has many implications, the predominant usage of which I see on these boards is to link young conservatives to the neonazi movement. It's right up there with leftard, bleeding heart liberal, religious nutbar, etc....
What do you say fellow cons? We should have a Pride parade or something.
duck!!!!!i like the idea but i think we would just be attacked by "peace activists"!
I think a Neocon is more often a branding by somebody on an online discussion like this one. I believe I was branded as one rather recently for agreeing that Obama is s failure on another thread, or was that as a Nazi? I digress. It usually doesn't mean one is a neocon, but rather somebody who disagrees with the point of another and an insult disguised as a label thrown around liberally by one from a certain side of the political spectrum who doesn't agree with anothers point of view. As karrie mentioned, a libtard is also similar, but IMO, not used as often.
As you know, I've been called FAR worse on this forum.
"Come over to the Dark Side Luke!"If you would just embrace your neo-con side and come out of the closet you would realize the benefits. After being outed you will be able to b1tch about taxes, pave over bums in the gutter, call bums bums instead homeless people.
But best of will be able to drive Gerryh absolutely nuts!
Muhahahahahahahaha!
I am in fact a moderate
You are definitely an extremist, black and white sort of guy, so ya, far right suits you.If your willing to accept the Neocon label from your adversaries, don't you also have to let them decide if you're at the same time "moderate"? I'd call myself moderate too, but if I examine my positions on all the major hot topics, there is no way I could escape the label "far-right" from everyone. Basically the only way I think the left would be willing to label you moderate, would be if you were an economic conservative, but liberal on social issues.