Where will it all end?

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
72
Ottawa ,Canada
This printing is dedicated to Joe Thauberger of Regina, Saskatchewan. This material is just one small example from the researcher and visionary who educated his fellow Canadians about the wicked monetary system and international finance. We owe a great gratitude to a man who so selflessly spent over 60 years of his adult life dedicated to this cause. Let his work live on until we meet again. Mr. Thauberger passed away in 1998
_______________________________________

Where will it all end?
It will end with less and less welfare, health care, pensions, etc., and finally end with riots in the streets and a tyrant running our government. You may say it can't happen here. It is happening in every country in the world where debt and interest becomes unpayable.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH CANADA? In 1867 the Fathers of Confederation gave the federal government (under Section 91 of the British North America Act) the right to create Canada's money supply. However, our federal government has given this right to the private chartered banks. Instead of getting our money supply for the cost of printing, our federal government now borrows the money from the chartered banks and pays over $40 billion per year interest. Payment of this interest took 33% of all the taxes collected in the last fiscal year. This means all businesses, farmers and individuals also have to borrow our money supply. Because money to pay this interest is never issued, we have to borrow the money to pay the interest. Thus borrowing drives all of us, including our governments, deeper and deeper into debt.
The Good Book says, that the borrower is the servant of the lender. So, most of us, including our governments, are servants of the lender, namely, the private banks.
HERE IS WHAT THIS SYSTEM HAS ALREADY DONE TO US.

(NOTE: The "progress" shown between 1990 and 1993 has come at the expense of billions of dollars in new taxes like the G.S.T. and billions more in important program cuts. The results? A reduction in the per person debt load by a mere $71! Besides, this "per person" cost is only lower because of a growth in the population from 27 million to 29 million).
Our interest payments on the federal debt alone have increased a thousand times in the last 80 years. It is only a matter of time now until the International Monetary Fund and their fellow bankers refuse more credit. Canada will then be in the same situation as the third world countries.
 
Last edited:

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
72
Ottawa ,Canada
There are three main reasons why people love money:

  1. Money will buy nearly every desire.
  2. Money makes money, without work, namely through charging interest.
  3. Money is POWER and prestige - power over the lives of your fellow men.
CANADA'S TOTAL DEBT - BOTH PUBLIC & PRIVATE Federal 1979 $98,461,000,000 1994 $519,845,000,000 *1 Provincial and Local Gov't. 1978 $46,875,000,000 1993 $375,852,000,000 *2 Corporation 1978 $421,293,000,000 1992 $1,554,248,000,000 *3 SUBTOTAL $566,629,000,000 $2,449,945,000,000 Consumers Credit 1979 $ 37,661,000,000 1993 $100,350,000,000 *4 Residential Mortgages 1980 $57,950,000,000 1992 $288,644,000,000 *5 TOTAL $662,240,000,000 $2,838,939,000,000 What do these figures mean to you? You may have your house, farm, or business paid for and have no consumer loan. But, your share of the $519,845,000,000 federal, and $375,852,000,000 provincial and local government debt, plus the $1,554,248,000,000 corporation debt (on which you pay the interest when you buy their production), comes to a total debt of $2,449,945,000,000 or $84,292 per capita or an interest payment at 10% of $8,429 per person and $33,716 for a family of four. You say: "IMPOSSIBLE!!! - we could not afford to pay this amount of interest!!!" You are so right. We borrow the money to pay it - and this further increases the debt! DEFICITS! DEFICITS! DEFICITS!
* source - *1 Doomsday Clock, 1994 *2 Fraser Institute, 1994
*3 Fraser Institute, 1994 *4 Bank of Canada Review
*5 Bank of Canada Review

What Do The Experts Say?

______________________ THERE IS AN ANSWER ______________________ Toward a Sustainable Financial System for Canada
by John H. Hotson - Professor of Economics, Waterloo University
The most thorough going, and most beneficial, reform of Canadian banking would be for the Bank of Canada to buy back from the Chartered Banks all federal debt they hold, plus sufficient other assets to equal 100% of their demand deposits (M1a) liabilities, and then require them hence forth to maintain 100% reserves against all deposits transferable by cheque. At one stroke this reform would end our present fractional reserve or "private mints system" by which the banks create 95% of the money we use as they make loans. The Bank of Canada, or the Department of Finance, if this were desired, would then become the sole creator of money and the private banks would be reduced to their role of re-lending savings deposited with them without money creation.
[FONT=arial,helvetica]There is only one answer to calamity
and that is MONETARY REFORM.
[/FONT]
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
We are about to be plunged into overt total global war to avoid precisely that type of reform and any banking reform that does not emanate from the bank itself. BIS, the front and frontmen for Satan and the Lizard Kings. Knowledge is power, money is a medium of exchange.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
72
Ottawa ,Canada
BILLIONS for the BANKERS
DEBTS for the PEOPLE



Canadians living in what is called one of the richest countries in natural resources per capita on earth, seem to be short of money. Families require two wage earners just to survive as wives are working in unprecedented numbers, husbands hope for overtime hours to earn more, or either take extra part-time jobs evenings and weekends; children look for odd jobs for spending money; the family debt climbs higher; and, psychologists say one of the biggest causes of family quarrels and breakups is "arguments over money." Much of this trouble can be traced to our present "debt-money" system.
Few Canadians realize why the Fathers of Confederation wrote into the British North America Act (under Section 91, Clause 14 and 15), that Legislative Authority of Parliament shall have the power to issue "Currency and Coinage" and "Banking, Incorporation of Banks, and the Issue of Paper Money". They did this, in prayerful hope that it would prevent the love of money from destroying the democratic government they had founded.

MONEY IS MAN'S ONLY "CREATION"

Economists use the word "create" when speaking of the process by which money comes into existence. New creation means making something that did not exist before. Lumbermen make boards from trees; workers build houses from lumber; and, factories manufacture automobiles from metal, glass and other materials. But in all these they did not "create" - they only changed existing materials into a more usable and therefore more valuable form. This is not so with money. Here and here alone, man actually "creates" something out of nothing. A piece of paper of little value is printed so that it is worth a piece of lumber. With different figures it can buy the automobile or even the house. Its value has been "created" in the true meaning of the word.
MONEY "CREATING" IS VERY PROFITABLE As is seen by the above, money is very cheap to make, and whoever does the "creating" of money in a nation can make a tremendous profit! Builders work hard to make a profit of 5% above their cost to build a house.
Auto makers sell their cars for 1% to 2% above the cost of manufacture and it is considered good business. But money "manufacturers" have no limit on their profits, since a few cents will print either a $1 bill or a $10,000 bill.
That profit is part of this story.


AN ADEQUATE MONEY SUPPLY IS NEEDED An adequate supply of money is indispensable to civilized society. We could forego many other things, but without money industry would grind to a halt, farms would become only self-sustaining units, surplus food would disappear, jobs requiring the work of more than one man or one family would remain undone, shipping and large movements of goods would cease, hungry people would plunder and kill to remain alive, and all government except family or tribe would cease to function. An overstatement, you say? Not at all. Money is the blood of civilized society, the means of all commercial trade except simple barter. It is the measure and the instrument by which one product is sold and another purchased. Remove money or even reduce the supply below that which is necessary to carry on at current levels of trade, and the results are catastrophic. For an example, we need only look at the Great Depression of the early 1930s.
THE BANKERS DEPRESSION OF THE 1930's In 1930 Canada did not lack industrial capacity, fertile farmland, skilled and willing workers or industrious farm families. It had an extensive and highly efficient transportation system in railroads, road networks, and inland and ocean waterways. Communications between regions and localities were the best in the world, utilizing telephone, teletype, radio and a well-operated government mail system. No war had ravaged the cities or the countryside, no pestilence weakened the population, nor had famine stalked the land. The Canadian economy in 1930 lacked only one thing: an adequate supply of money to carry on trade and commerce. Bankers, the source of Canada's money and credit, had deliberately withheld millions from circulation by refusing loans to stable and growing industries, stores and farmers. At the same time they demanded payment on existing loans so that money was rapidly taken out of circulation and was not replaced. Canada was put in a "depression" and in deep trouble. Goods were available to be purchased, jobs waiting to be done, but little money. Twenty-five percent of the workers were laid off. Banks took possession of tens of thousands of farms and businesses on foreclosure. Gloom settled over Canada and we can only visualize the results if this had continued 20 years instead of 10.

WAR ENDED "DEPRESSION"
Our "depression" lasted until 1939, when the Canadian Government began to spend large amounts of money into circulation for military preparedness for ourselves and future allies in Europe. As soon as the money supply went up people were hired back to work, farms sold their produce instead of plowing it under, mines reopened, factories began to hum and both industrial and residential construction began anew. The "Great Depression" was over. Some politicians were blamed for it and others took credit for ending it. The truth was that lack of money caused it and adequate supply ended it. The people were never told the simple truth and in this article we will endeavor to show how those who "manufacture" and "control" our money have used its profits to "buy" our politicians, and now control our Government. POWER TO COIN AND REGULATE MONEY When we can see the disastrous results of an artificially created shortage of money, we can better understand why our Founding Fathers, who understood both money and God's Laws, insisted on placing the power to "create" money and the power to control it ONLY in the hands of the Federal Government. They believed that ALL citizens should share in the profits of its "creation" and therefore the national government must be the ONLY creator of money. They further believed that ALL Canadian citizens, regardless of station in life, would benefit by an adequate and stable currency and therefore the national government must also be, by law, the ONLY controller of the value of money. Since the Federal Government was the only legislative body subject to all the citizens at the ballot box, it was, to their minds, the only safe depository of so much profit and so much power. They wrote it in simple language, "The Federal Government shall have the Power to Coin Money and Regulate the Value Thereof."

HOW THE PEOPLE LOST CONTROL
Instead of the Constitutional method of creating our money and putting it into circulation, we now have an entirely unconstitutional system. This has resulted in almost disastrous conditions, as we shall see. A historical sketch of currency and banking in Canada, tracing certain features of the central banking system that have finally led up to the establishment of the Bank of Canada appears on pages 900-905 of the 1938 Canada Year Book. In chronological order these are:

  1. Central Note Issue, permanently established with the issue of Dominion Notes under legislation of 1868.
  2. The Canadian Bankers' Association, established in 1900 and designed to effect greater co-operation amongst the banks in the issue of notes, in credit control and in various aspects of bank activities.
  3. The Central Gold Reserves, established by the Bank Act of 1913.
  4. Rediscount Facilities, originated as a war measure by the Finance Act of 1914, and made a permanent feature of this system by the Finance Act of 1923. This Act empowers the Minister of Finance to issue Dominion Notes to the banks on the deposit by them of approved securities, thus providing the banks with a means of increasing their legal tender cash reserve at will.

I would like, at this point, to emphasize the last line of the above quotation: "THUS PROVIDING THE BANKS WITH THE MEANS OF INCREASING THEIR LEGAL TENDER CASH RESERVE AT WILL." This is a most astounding statement. What it says is that the banks can create their own reserves, and then issue BANK CREDIT MONEY against these reserves that they themselves have created. In other words, they now need no gold, no silver, not even paper money, but all they need are government securities (bonds) as reserve for CREDIT MONEY and furthermore, they can buy these reserves (bonds) with the CREDIT MONEY that they have created. Did someone once say you can't get something for nothing? Let him investigate our monetary system and I am sure he will change his mind!
WE BORROW IT AND PAY THEM INTEREST We shall start with the need for money. The Federal Government, having spent more than it has taken from its citizens in taxes, needs, for the sake of illustration, $1,000,000,000 (1 BILLION DOLLARS). Since it does not have the money, because it has given away its authority to "create" it, the Government must go to the "creators" for the $1 billion. But, a private banking corporation doesn't just give its money away! The Bankers are willing to deliver $1,000,000,000 in money or credit to the Federal Government in exchange for the Government's agreement to pay it back - with interest! The government authorizes the Treasury Department to print $1,000,000,000 in Canadian bonds which are then delivered to the BANK OF CANADA. The BANK OF CANADA sells the BONDS to the privately owned banks. The privately owned banks pay for the bonds by creating a bank deposit of $1 billion on behalf of the federal government. This means that the private banks have created a billion dollars that did not exist before. This creation cost the private banks nothing except the cost of cancelling out the government cheques as the government spends the deposit by writing cheques against it. The private banks now own the billion dollars worth of bonds and at the present rate of 10 1/2% the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TAXES THE PEOPLE OF CANADA year after year to pay the interest. The federal government has to date piled up a mountainous debt of $519,845,000,000 and the interest on this debt this year is $44,000,000,000+ or a per capita debt of $1,513. This means a family of four is taxed $6,052 a year just to pay the interest.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
72
Ottawa ,Canada
BUT THAT IS NOT ALL!!!
THERE IS ALSO THE FRACTIONAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Under the fractional reserve system, the private banks can now take the GOVERNMENT BOND that they have bought by creating a deposit and use it as reserve to create more bank deposits. HOW MUCH CAN THEY CREATE? Under the 1967 Bank Act they could create 16 times the amount of their reserve. On page 10 of the book called "HOW THE CANADIAN MONEY SUPPLY IS AFFECTED BY VARIOUS BANKING AND FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS", published by the Royal Bank of. Canada, they themselves show how this is done. Imagine what this means. It means that with one dollar of reserve with the BANK OF CANADA, the private banks can loan out $15 of cheque book money and collect 15% interest. This gives them $2.25 of interest on every dollar held in reserve.

THIS IS STILL NOT ALL On November 19, 1980, Bill C-6 was passed in the Canadian House of Commons, which gave a further concession to the private banks. WHEREAS, the 1967 BANK ACT required a reserve of $4 on notice deposits and 12% on demand deposits, Bill C-6 reads as follows:
  • 208. (1) A bank shall maintain a primary reserve in the form of:

  1. coins with a face value of two dollars or less that are current under the Currency and Exchange Act,
  2. Bank of Canada notes, or
  3. deposits in Canadian currency with the Bank of Canada, and such reserve shall not be less on the average during the month than an amount equal to the aggregate of
  4. ten percent of such of its deposit liabilities as are Canadian currency demand deposit liabilities,
  5. two per cent of such of its deposit liabilities as are Canadian currency notice deposit liabilities.
This reduction in reserves will enable the private banks to issue from 20 to 25 times their reserves rather than 16 times - the amount they could issue under the 1967 BANK ACT. This lowering of the reserves will mean that the banks can issue at least 25% more money than they were able to issue under the 1967 BANK ACT. This increase will be needed to replace the money withdrawn by ever-increasing interest, repayment of loans, and to make up for the extra money needed because of inflation. This of course will increase bank profits.
Bankers and their government supporters will say that many of these criticisms of the reserve system are no longer valid because of 1991 changes to the Bank Act. However, the changes are for the worse! Perhaps the greatest tragedy that has happened to our country since the fourth edition of Billions for the Bankers - Debts for the People is the change in the new Bank Act. The private chartered banks have won a major battle. Under the 1967 Bank Act, the Minister of Finance had the power over the governor of the Bank of Canada to reduce or increase the fractional reserve of the private chartered banks, thereby increasing or reducing the money supply. Under Sec. 457 of December 1991, the Minister of Finance has lost this power by the elimination of the fractional reserve system. This is not all. Under Sec. 410 and Sec. 434 the private chartered banks are given the following additional powers:

  • Sec. 410

  1. act as a custodian of property; and
  2. act as receiver, liquidator or sequestrator

  • Sec. 434 (2) Nothing in any charter, Act or law shall be construed as ever having been intended to prevent or as preventing a bank from acquiring and holding an absolute title to and in any mortgaged or hypothecated real property, whatever the value thereof, or from exercising or acting on any power of sale contained in any mortgage given to or held by the bank, authorizing or enabling it to sell or convey any property so mortgaged. These changes in the Bank Act have given the banks a complete right over our money supply. And, unless this power is restored to Parliament and the Banks put on 100% reserve, all talk of democracy and sovereignty of Parliament is truly idle and futile. You may ask why the banks do not show more profits if it is such a lucrative business. Of course they do show tremendous profits year after year. They have been showing an increase of profits of anywhere from 20 to 35% for a number of years. But not all the profits of banks are reported.

AS FAR BACK AS 1934 BANKS WERE HIDING RESERVES. The following excerpt is from the BANK AND COMMERCE COMMITTEE, APRIL 19. 1934. (BEFORE THEY WERE ON THEIR GUARD...) Evidence of Mr. Jackson Dodds (of the Bank of Montreal and President of the Bankers' Association at that time), before the Banking and Commerce Committee on April 19, 1934:
QUESTION: What other controlled companies are there?
ANSWER: We have the St. James Land Company Limited with a capital of $200,000, owned entirely by the Bank of Montreal and carried at $1.00. The officers are officers of the bank. The company was incorporated by the Molsons Bank, which deeded over to it that portion of their property known as Lot "B", corner of St. Peter and Notre Dame Streets, Montreal.
THE CHAIRMAN: The Bank owned the stock?
ANSWER: Yes
QUESTION: (By Mr. Power) I suppose the Molsons Bank had a controlled company to look after its real estate?
ANSWER: Yes, the property being the head office of the bank.
QUESTION: They only had one property?
ANSWER: Yes.
QUESTION: That is now owned and controlled by the Bank of Montreal?
ANSWER: Owned and controlled by the Bank of Montreal.
QUESTION: The directors are the directors of the bank?
ANSWER: No. The directors are officers of the bank. The secretary of the bank is the president.
QUESTION: Who has the stock?
ANSWER: The bank owns the whole of the stock, which is only $200,000 and is carried on the books at $1.00.

In years gone by, when someone advocated monetary reform, he was immediately ridiculed and branded as a crackpot or "funny money" advocate. However, those days are gone. Most people today know that there is something wrong with our monetary system. When they see the value of money fluctuating - going up and down like a yo yo - they know there is something wrong. They may not know the nature of the problem, but they know that there is no stability in our money.
Most people look upon money as a medium of exchange. But, money is more than a medium of exchange. It is also a measure of values, a standard of deferred payment, as well as a store of values. Therefore, if money is to be a true measure of value, it must have stability.
You can imagine what would happen if the pound was 16 ounces one day and 12 or 14 ounces the next day; or if the foot had 12 inches one day and 10 inches the next day. The same applies to the gallon measure. If this was done, chaos would follow. The same applies to money. Saving, borrowing and repayment become a highly risky business when money is unstable. We see what confusion was caused by changing to metric, although at least this was one stable method to another and there was no fluctuation in either system. No, there is no doubt we must bring back stability into our monetary system.
But at last news is coming from an increasing number of economists who are advocating a sound and stable monetary system. The governments made a bad decision back in 1936 when two systems were offered to them. One was by John Maynard Keynes, the other by Irving Fisher. Keynes wrote a book called The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money in which he advocated that the government should borrow huge sums of money and then spend this money on a public works program. He called it priming of the economic pump to get the economy rolling again.
Irving Fisher, an economics professor at Yale University, also wrote a book about the same time called 100% Money. In this book he advocated that the government should issue our money rather than let the banks create the money and have the government borrow it and pay interest on it as Keynes proposed. This is so important, let me repeat it. Fisher advocated that the government should issue the money, thereby creating neither debt nor the burdensome interest which must be paid through taxation. Had we followed Fisher rather than Keynes, Canadians would be in clover today.
Irving Fisher was not the only one at the time advocating that the government issue our money supply. Government issuance of the money supply was also advocated by the Chicago Group of economists. This group was comprised of Professors Harvey Simons, Lloyd Mints, A.G. Hart, Frank Knight, Garfield Cox, Henry Schultz and Paul H. Douglas. There are so many economists, businessmen and even former bankers in the U.S.A. now supporting this view that space does not permit the publishing of all their names.
There is one more outstanding economist who has backed monetary reform. It is Nobel Prize winner Milton Friedman. He wrote a book in 1960 called, A Program for Monetary Stability. On page 65 he stated that he was in favor of what Henry Simons and Lloyd Mints were advocating, that is, 100% reserve. In other words, he advocated that governments, rather than private banks, issue the money supply.
We also have some outstanding Canadians advocating the same. John Hotson, Professor of Economics, University of Waterloo, Professor Gordon Borham of the University of Ottawa, (Economic Thinking in a Canadian Context, page 589), and Professor Warren Blackman of Calgary University.

WHAT CAN YOU DO

Pray for Canada's release from the wicked money control, which is at the root of our debts and wars.
Buy ten or more Billions for Bankers - Debts for the People. Sell or distribute them to others and tell them to do the same. Soon all Canadians will be informed of why we have ever greater deficits, inflation, increased taxes, unemployment and bankruptcies.
For extra copies of this booklet, write or call:
Freedom Foundations Inc.
Box 19, Site4, RRl
Christopher Lake SK
Canada SOJ ONO
(306) 982-3035

Price: $3.00 each /10 for $2.50 each / 50 or more for $2.00 each
Shipping: $ .50 each /10 for $5.00 pkg. / 50 for $10.00 pkg.
NOW HOW DO YOU EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE SO THAT YOU CAN
FIX YOUR FINANCIAL HOUSE SINCE THEY WON'T FIX THEIRS?

You must empower yourself with further reading and research so that you truly know WHY you must regain your personal JUSTICE and FREEDOM or you will get more of the same. Remember one definition of INSANITY is: The belief that you will get different results by doing the same thing.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
72
Ottawa ,Canada
Our present banking system was born in fraud, deceit and treachery. It has been perpetrated in the same manner as the goldsmith buying the favor of the king. Now the bankers, through their political donations, are buying the favor of the government. Here are a few statistics:
LIBERALS
CONSERVATIVES
1989 $237,609.59 $231,188.46 1990 $256,202.44 $234,997.33 1991 $237,797.17 $236,686.52 1992 $244,301.54 $242,093.04 1993 $450,424.60 $469,147.45 TOTAL $1,426,335.34 $1,414,112.80
We have all heard about the concentration of wealth in Canada where so very few people own and control most of the assets of the country. The above statistics only show the donations made by the Chartered Banks to the two political parties. This is only a fraction of the donations which come from the corporate sector - many corporations, of course, have interlocking directorships whereby the same officials serve on the Board of both corporations and the banks. Together with the political donations of these corporations and the individual donations of those who serve on them, these funds make up the majority of the election "war chests" these parties use to gain and maintain power. It is little wonder then that each successive government manages to protect the interests of the bankers who got them elected. Before we allow cuts to any more important programs shouldn't we ask why our way of life is being sacrificed for the sake of compound interest agreements between bankers and their friendly politicians?


http://www.somagardens.com/billions/b-p31.htm
 

2AdEPT

New Member
Dec 28, 2010
1
0
1
CHina,

I found your message owing to searching my Grandfather's name on google, as it appears his citations on Google increase even though he has passed for some time now. We always thought he was a little scattered with his approach, but more and more people are listening today with the recession on the horizon and no real reason for it.

HIs "what to do about it" is a little out dated.....

check out :

zeitgeistaddendum.com
venusproject.com