Hello. I found this article which relates to Canada and I'm a little concerned about what Canada's future will bring to the people who were here for generations and the cultural makeup of the country.
This is what is happening in the UK and Canada's on the exact same road.
Will Canada be predominately moslem/african/asian and foreign in the next decades? Living in Toronto, the city has become progressively worse in terms of crime, urban decay, disappearance of good neighbourhoods being replaced by less desirable areas and the list goes on. With the exception of an odd trip to cottage country, it already feels unsafe and unfamiliar to me. Not to talk about that due to mass immigration, driving on city streets is nearly impossible.
If the United Kingdom becomes non-white in the upcoming decades, and the chaces of that are very high, where will the millions of Canadians who call their ancestry British call their homeland? Canada and the UK as we known them would have been wiped out.
If Canada and the UK both become 'foreign countries', have we already sealed our culture/race/history's fate?
If multiculturalism can only exist in liberal western societies, how will it survive when the new majority of the population is still essentially keeping to their old cultures which Canada encourages? It's not a immature guesstimate to assume that when Canada's multi-cultures outpace the mainstream, that they will want autonomy from what used to be the mainstream.
What will be the future of Canada and our way of life? I can't see anything good coming from it and UK, Canada will no longer be what we know them to be; British and Canadian.
This is what is happening in the UK and Canada's on the exact same road.
Whites will be an ethnic minority in Britain by the end of the century. Analysis of official figures indicate that, at current fertility rates and levels of immigration, there will be more non-whites than whites by 2100.
It would be the first time in history that a major indigenous population has voluntarily become a minority, rather than through war, famine or disease. Whites will be a minority in London by 2010.
In the early 1950s there were only a few tens of thousands of non-whites in the UK. By 1991 that had risen to 3 million - 6 per cent of the population. The population of ethnic minorities has been growing at between 2 and 4 per cent a year. Net immigration has been running at record levels, with 185,000 newcomers last year.
Government forecasts suggest that immigration on its own will be responsible for half the growth of the British population over the next couple of decades.
New immigrants, who are on average younger than the population at large, also tend to have higher fertility rates. In contrast, the population of white British citizens is static. Their fertility rate is very low - at under 2 children per woman - and there is overall emigration of British citizens.
The analysis of the figures showed that if the population of ethnic minorities grows at 4 per cent a year, whites will become a minority before 2100. The demographer who made the calculation wished to remain anonymous for fear of accusations of racism.
guardian.co.uk
Will Canada be predominately moslem/african/asian and foreign in the next decades? Living in Toronto, the city has become progressively worse in terms of crime, urban decay, disappearance of good neighbourhoods being replaced by less desirable areas and the list goes on. With the exception of an odd trip to cottage country, it already feels unsafe and unfamiliar to me. Not to talk about that due to mass immigration, driving on city streets is nearly impossible.
If the United Kingdom becomes non-white in the upcoming decades, and the chaces of that are very high, where will the millions of Canadians who call their ancestry British call their homeland? Canada and the UK as we known them would have been wiped out.
If Canada and the UK both become 'foreign countries', have we already sealed our culture/race/history's fate?
Another more recent and conservative criticism, based largely upon the Nordic and Canadian experience, is presented by the administrative scientist Gunnar K. A. Njalsson, who views multiculturalism as a utopian ideology with a simplistic and overly optimistic view of human nature, the same weakness he attributes to communism, anarchism, and many strains of liberalism. According to Njalsson, multiculturalism is particular to a western urban environment and cannot survive as an ideology outside it. Some variants of multiculturalism, he believes, may equip non-egalitarian cultural groups with power and influence. This, in turn, may alter the value system of the larger society. This realist criticism of multiculturalism maintains that in Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the US, multiculturalism may aggravate a situation where old-stock families are not permitted by the countries of their forebearers to consider themselves English, French, Scandinavian, etc., while newer arrivals can claim two or more national identities.
from wikipedia
If multiculturalism can only exist in liberal western societies, how will it survive when the new majority of the population is still essentially keeping to their old cultures which Canada encourages? It's not a immature guesstimate to assume that when Canada's multi-cultures outpace the mainstream, that they will want autonomy from what used to be the mainstream.
What will be the future of Canada and our way of life? I can't see anything good coming from it and UK, Canada will no longer be what we know them to be; British and Canadian.