Canadian history and identity.

ironaxe

New Member
Jun 7, 2006
23
0
1
Hi folks.

I'm English and love history, my favourite era is the later Anglo-saxon period but I also read about other era's including WWI & II.

I have always wondered how you Canadians feel about several things;

Your country's terrible sacrifice during both world wars, and the British role?

Your relationship with either the UK or the USA, past and present?

Britain and it's role in 18th/19thC America/Canada?

Canada's portrayal in movies, especially in war films?

Thanks.
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
RE: Canadian history and

This'll be long, get a sandwich:

Your country's terrible sacrifice during both world wars, and the British role?

Yes, Canada did pay a hefty price for our involvment during both World Wars (considering the small population we had), however I myself feel that our contributions to both conflicts were justified. During World War I, when Britain declared war on Germany, Canada was automatically at war, however our status as a Dominion meant that we were obligated only to send whatever we felt was needed for the war effort. Many in Canada just wanted us to send logistical support (i.e. blankets, food, ammo), while others wanted us to send every able bodied man to fight on the front lines. Considering at the outbreak of war, the Canadian Army was no more than 3,000 Regular and Militia soldiers, and the Canadian Navy consisted of six (6) warships ( 2x Cruisers, 1x Light Cruiser, 2 x Destroyers, 1x Minesweeper), our work was cut out for us. By the end of the War, our Army consisted of 5 Infantry Divisions (in the neighbourhood of some 225,000 men), our Navy consisted of 129 surface vessels and 4 submarines, and the Royal Canadian Air Force had at its disposal over 100 aircraft. When we entered the War, in the Spring of 1915, at Ypres, we were largely seen as a joke. Poorly trained colonial troops, unfit for anything other than guarding an outhouse. In 1915, for those that do not know, the World saw the first poison gas attack ever. At Ypres, the Germans unleashed 5,000 canisters of poison gas on the Canadian and French lines. Expecting us to run, they then charged head-long at us, where the French broke, but the Canadians stood. Despite the choking mustard gas, the PPCLI fought off every German wave thrown at them. Following Ypres, the value of the Canadian Army was reappraised, and we were given a large task in the War. We became, over time, known for our ability to stand and fight, and defeat insurmountable odds. We fought at Arras, The Somme, The Marne, Verdun, and Flers-Courcelette, and with every victory, or bloody defeat, we began to be seen as elite soldiers that could get the job done, or die trying. The International opinion of us changed on April 9th, 1917, when the 1st Canadian Corps (4 Divisions) fighting together for the first time (before this, Canadian Divisions were split up and put where they were needed), rose from their trenches on a snowy Easter morning and began advancing up the German strongpoint of Vimy Ridge. By noon the Ridge was in Canadian hands, with small pockets of resistance remaining. It should be pointed out that the Germans controlled Vimy from the start over the War and that the British had lost over 200,000 men trying to capture Vimy, and the French 150,000.It's for this reason that many have gone on to say that April 9th, 1917, not July 1st, 1867, was the day Canada truely became a Nation. Our identity of a free and independent Nation was forged on the bloody slopes of Vimy, an identity that came with a heavy price; 3,598 men killed and 10,602 wounded. Post-Vimy the respect for Canadians was extreme on both sides. During the last 100 Days of the War (including Cambrai and the Pursuit to Mons) Canadians spearheaded EVERY offensive. At the close of World War I, Canada had suffered terribly; 66,655 dead, and 172,950 wounded. As a result of our sacrifice, we were given a seat at the fledgling League of Nations.

World War II saw a repeat of the 1st World War. Canada was woefully unprepared. We had around 8,000 men in the Army, and somewhere around a dozen warships, with almost no Air Force to speak of. By the end of the War our Army had ballooned to 4 Infantry Divisions, 2 Armored Divisions, 1 Logistical Division, 2 Independent Armoured Brigades, and an Airborne Battalion, all encompasing around 1.1 million men. Our Navy grew to over 300 warships (3rd largest in the World), and our Air Force peaked at around 780 aircraft (4th largest in the World). The thing many don't realize is that during World War II, we were never obligated to be there, times had changed since WW I. However, we declared war on Germany exactly 1 week after Britain (to show our independence), and never looked back. World War II was a bloody repeat of World War I for Canada. It all sparked off in 1940/41 with the utter defeat of "C" Force defending Hong Kong. The Japanese utterly obliterated the Winnipeg Grenadies and the Royal Rifles of Canada. These two valiant Regiments held off for weeks against the Japanese horde, but in the end were encircled and wiped out, many being forced on the Bataan Death March, in to captivity, where numerous died at the brutal hands of the Japanese. The 2nd Canadian Division landed at Dieppe in an effort to open a second front in Europe, and were utterly massacared due to poor support from Britain and the United States. In Sicily things turned around for us. We helped clear Sicily and moved on to Italy where we fought some fierce engagements; Ortona, The Gothic Line, and the Hindenburg Line. In 1944, we landed in Normandy, comprising over 1/5 of the total Allied Strength. Canada, and Canada alone, liberated the Dutch (something they are thankful for to this day). Our Navy spent the entire course of the War policing over 1/2 of the Atlantic against German U-boats, and our Air Force was instrumental in fighting the Battle of Britain. In all, during World War II, we performed better than we did in World War I. We gained the respect of not only the British and Americans, but the Germans as well. In the end, we went through 6 long bloody years of war at a cost of; 42,042 dead and 53,145 wounded. While it is terrible to look at the numbers and see over 100,000 Canadian men and women killed in less than 50 years, I will never say that we should not have joined the War. We accomplished a lot, the War helped earn Canada much international recognition, and at the end of the day we did our duty and helped prevent two radical German Governments from conquering all of Europe.

Now, as for British involvment. This is somewhat of a sore subject for me. Let me first start off by saying that I have a deep respect for both the past and present day British military. I've worked with Brits several times and they're top notch. In the past, they performed well, better than a lot of other Nations did. At the end of the day though my beef lies not with Britians capabilites during both World Wars, but with the way they treated the colonials (Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, and Pakistani). We were seen, even until late in both wars, as poor excuses for soldiers. Canadians and Australians were notorious for being rowdy and causing much chaos both on and off the battlefield. The British have always been known for their pomp, but in War one should expect that to wither away, sadly with the British Officer class, it did not. There was a deep animosity between the Canadian leadership and their British counterparts (whom the Canadians fell under in the order of battle). One issue that stands out the most is the issue of summary executions conducted on the Western Front from 1914-1918 against Canadian soldiers. Over a four year period 346 British soldiers were tied to a pole and executed by British Command for a wide range of offenses (rape, theft, murder, refusing to fight, shell shock (which later was identified and treated, albeit after some 50 soldiers were executed for it). In addition to the several hundred British executed there were; 25 Canadians, 13 Belgians, and 5 New Zealanders. My issue with this was that while we were indeed serving WITH British forces, our lads should not have been shot on a British whim. If you'll notice, there are no Australians listed, that's because Australia refused to let their troops be shot. Sadly Canada was forced (through politics and military manouvering) in to letting Britain have their way. It's a sad piece of Canadian military history when one looks back and sees the names of 25 men shot at dawn (8 for suffering shellshock). Furthermore, British command during World War I was abhorent. A terrific example is the Battle of the Somme, in which a "fool-proof" British plan to run the Germans out of France resulted in over 50,000 casualties in the first eight hours. The offensive went on for months, with the British literally throwing thousands of men at German machine gun positions. In the end, at a cost of 420,000 British casualties, 200,000 French, 24,029 Canadian, 19,240 Belgian and 7,080 Australian casualties, for a gain of 11 kilometers. As a result of the Somme, Canada refused to remain in British sole command, and this lead to the formation of the 1st Canadian Corps (all 4 Canadian Divisions fighting together), which went in to action at Vimy. During the 2nd World War Canada utterly refused to allow Britian direct control of our Divisions. Yes, we intergrated with the British Army, but at the end of the day, Canadians were commanded by Canadians. In fact, as a result of this, several high profile Canadian Generals came to light. A great example is Lieutenant-General Guy Simonds, who (at 41 years old) commanded the 2nd Canadian Corps in Europe. Some noteable things said about Simonds:

British Field Marshall Bernard Law Montgomery = "only general fit to hold high command in war"
U.S General Omar Bradley. = "the best of the Canadian generals"
British General Sir Miles Dempsey ="the best of my Corps Commanders"
German Field Marshall Erwin Rommel ="a more dangerous man on the Western Front there is not"

Sadly though, due to the fact that Canada was still, in a round about way, under British command, many of our achievements have gone unnoticed for generations. It makes me wonder who here, on these forums knows any of these famous Canadian battles, and what happened there, from World War I;

Ypres*
Arras*
The Somme
The Marne
Verdun
Loos
Flers-Courcelette
Vimy Ridge *
Asine
Passchendaele*
Cambrai *
Le Hamel
Mons*

Or these from World War II:

Dunquerque*
Hong Kong
Tobruk
Dieppe
Sicily
Salerno
Ortona*
The Gothic Line*
The Hindenburg Line*
The Rimini Line*
Rome*
D-Day*
The Scheldt*
THe Hochwald*
Bergen-Belsen

The ones with an asterix denote pivotal Battles during each war. Battles, that if not won, would have set the Allies back largely. I bet no one here even knows that Canadian troops were the first ones to enter Rome, for in movies, and even some history books, it is always credited to the Americans. Does anyone know that if Canada had not liberated Antwerp (The Schedlt) the War would have faltered? No, because Canada is constantly overshadowed by Britian and America.

Ok my fingers are aching from typing and I really need to work. However I will weigh in with additional info on your other questions later tonight. Thanks for reading.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Wow! Mogz! What an excellent little essay. I'm saving that one.

And yes, I know of all those battles and what they were about. Canada's military history is one of my particular interests. One of my uncles was with the First Canadian Parachute Battalion when they met the advancing Red Army at Wismar. 1st Cdn Paras were also the only Canadian unit at the Ardennes, the famous Battle of the Bulge to Americans, but I've never seen any American history that acknowledges that.

Personally, I think we (Canadians) have done a terrible job of teaching our history to our children, but that's another subject.
 

Daz_Hockey

Council Member
Nov 21, 2005
1,927
7
38
RE: Canadian history and

completly agree with Mogz, I think most people in Britain are fully aware of the HUGE role Canada played in securing Britain's freedom, and indeed the freedom of the western world.

I think also (sorry this is a bit of a recurring theme with me) but Mogz once again has it spot on, the british upper class (i.e. the generals in charge) treated Canadians as poor soldiers, and infact it wasnt the common British Cannon fodder that treated them that way, my Great Uncle was in the RAF, he told me a while ago that "Britain would be dead in a matter of days if it wernt for the Canadians, along with some poles and free french" they were largly responsible for gaining the control of our sky's, supplying the convy's and bolstering the Allied army's...is there any more they could have done?...no, Canada in my opinion (more than most other commonwealth nations) have been treated disgustingly by the landed gentry in Britain as well as our leaders, yet they never really lost faith, and yes, I think Britain should have completly allowed for an independant country long before 1984?.

Canada is and was a great country, with a great heritage, and in my personal opinion, those officers that gave the orders to basically genocidally murder British Empire troops should have been Hung after the war, they should be ashamed of themselves.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Excellent reading! WWI especially saw Canadians of British ancestry dominate enlistment. And it was they who suffered the bulk of Canadian casualties. Not to be forgotten too is the bitter conscription crisis of WWII. Canadians who fought in this last world war were volunteers. King tried to bolster the troops in 1944 but met impediment after impediment. It is Canada's shame that the bulk of those who were asked to serve (conscription) refused to do so, and at a time when their fellow countrymen were overtaxed in Europe, and pushed to their physical limits, declined to come to their aid.
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
RE: Canadian history and

And yes, I know of all those battles and what they were about. Canada's military history is one of my particular interests. One of my uncles was with the First Canadian Parachute Battalion when they met the advancing Red Army at Wismar. 1st Cdn Paras were also the only Canadian unit at the Ardennes, the famous Battle of the Bulge to Americans, but I've never seen any American history that acknowledges that.

Personally, I think we (Canadians) have done a terrible job of teaching our history to our children, but that's another subject.

Wismar, yes, the first encounter between Canadian soliders and members of the Red Army, not many know of that. More so, i'm impressed you know about 1 Can Para's Ardennes connection. That fact has never been started outside of history circles, and is something that is completely overlooked by hollywood. I could not agree more that Canadians have done a terrible job informing future generations. Sadly, Canada has never been, nor in my opinion, ever will be, a military focused Nation. We're too focused on the here and now, and utterly refuse to look back on how we got to where we are today, and what it has cost us.

"Britain would be dead in a matter of days if it wernt for the Canadians

How true. One thing I did forget to point out (and your post reminded me daz), is that following the Withdrawl from Dunquerque, the 1st and 2nd Canadian Infantry Divisions (in England) were the only fully equipped and capable land forces availabe to defend England from German invasion, due to the utter chaos of the British Land Forces. If the Germans had managed to win control of the skies, and therefore launch Operation Sealion, I think the war would have turned out much differently.

Excellent reading! WWI especially saw Canadians of British ancestry dominate enlistment. And it was they who suffered the bulk of Canadian casualties. Not to be forgotten too is the bitter conscription crisis of WWII. Canadians who fought in this last world war were volunteers. King tried to bolster the troops in 1944 but met impediment after impediment. It is Canada's shame that the bulk of those who were asked to serve (conscription) refused to do so, and at a time when their fellow countrymen were overtaxed in Europe, and pushed to their physical limits, declined to come to their aid.

How very true. One fact that Canada can be proud of is, during World War II we fielded the ONLY all-volunteer military. No other Nation on Earth can make that claim. It is often claimed that, that is the true reason behind why Canada has always fielded great armys. When a military is purely volunteer, everyone believes in the cause. When the bulk of your manpower are conscripts, quality is bound to decline.

Thanks all for your kind words on the subject and my post. I'll add more to this thread when I get back to work tomorrow (ran out of time today).
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Mogz ol' buddy, my respect and admiration for your knowledge, your attitudes, your commitments, and your erudition, continue to grow. You're clearly one of the good guys, a thoughtful patriot I called you in another thread. We gotta have a beer sometime...
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Great thread. My wife's Great Grandfather died at Vimy. Believe it or not no one in her living family knew about this until she did some serious genealogy. Mindboggling really. She has it 100% confirmed, the feds even sent her numerous documents after she proved it to them.

If this kind of thing isn't being past to the next generation of direct descendants, who the heck else is keeping track? Why on Earth would a parent not tell their kids about a grandparents sacrifice? Some people need to wake up.
 

ironaxe

New Member
Jun 7, 2006
23
0
1
Thanks for your interesting replies, guys.
Or these from World War II:

Dunquerque*
Hong Kong
Tobruk
Dieppe
Sicily
Salerno
Ortona*
The Gothic Line*
The Hindenburg Line*
The Rimini Line*
Rome*
D-Day*
The Scheldt*
THe Hochwald*
Bergen-Belsen

What about the Canadian troop's characteristically courageous role in the long and bloody multi-national 1944 campaign of Monte Cassino- or is that included in the Rimini line?
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Mogzy

I really enjoy your long posts, I have certainly lost patience after 8000 posts. I'm somewhat of a history buff, not so much military history unless battles reach "mythical" proportion which always leads me to believe there is a touch of nationalism involved. Rather than getting off topic, how about we engage in some historical debate in the History Forum? We can start with WWII if you fancy.
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
Mogz ol' buddy, my respect and admiration for your knowledge, your attitudes, your commitments, and your erudition, continue to grow. You're clearly one of the good guys, a thoughtful patriot I called you in another thread. We gotta have a beer sometime...

Well I most certainly appreciate the kind remarks. It's nice to know that my views are appreciated by at least a few. My whole reason for posting here is to spread positive information about Canada and our place in the World. Far too often our way of life is misconstrued to completely overlooked. Hence why I champion certain causes with such vehemence. That all said and done, thanks muchly for the kind words. As for the beer, are you buying? Also note, i'm not putting out. ;)

Great thread. My wife's Great Grandfather died at Vimy. Believe it or not no one in her living family knew about this until she did some serious genealogy. Mindboggling really. She has it 100% confirmed, the feds even sent her numerous documents after she proved it to them.

If this kind of thing isn't being past to the next generation of direct descendants, who the heck else is keeping track? Why on Earth would a parent not tell their kids about a grandparents sacrifice? Some people need to wake up.

Sadly Kreskin, sometimes these things are lost in the shuffle. My Grandfather (on my fathers side), landed on D-Day with the Canadian Scottish and fought for 4 days before being wounded by a German MG42 near Caen. After the War he hung around long enough to father 3 children in rapid succession, then left the family, never to be heard from again. My father grew up knowing NOTHING about the man except he fought in Normandy with the Canadian Scottish and returned wounded in late 1944. For years my father tried to piece together the history, always running in to dead ends. He tried the National War Archives of Canada, and they outright snubbed him. Only this year, in fact last month (June), did my father actually cut through the red-tape of Ottawa and get FULL access to his fathers service record, which all along, was sitting in the National Archives. My point to all this Kreskin is that sometimes things happen along the way that either erase all trace of a person, or delay their deeds from coming to light. I've spent a few hours pouring over my Grandfathers service record, complete with photos of him before and after being wounded (quite sad really, as he was shot in the face) and i've often found myself deeply saddened by the notion that if my father hadn't pushed the issue (and used his military rank) then this mans deeds and accomplishments may never have been dregged up. I will say however Kreskin, that i'm glad to hear your Wife was able to find out about that little bit of history. One thing I would suggest you do, is try to get either the originals (or copies) of her Great Grandfathers wartime medals. Holding on to something like that and passing them down from generation to generation is an excellent way to remember those who served this Nation. It's something my family does, and i'm proud to say that everyone (male and female) in my family knows of the deeds accomplished by those who came before us.

What about the Canadian troop's characteristically courageous role in the long and bloody multi-national 1944 campaign of Monte Cassino- or is that included in the Rimini line?

I'm not sure if you're aware or not, but Canada didn't play a MAJOR role at Monte Cassino itself. The only Canadian unit to actually attack Monte Cassino (the Gustav Line) was the 1st Canadian Armoured Brigade. All other units of the 1st Canadian Corps (5th Canadian Armoured Division and 1st Canadian Infantry Division) near Monte Cassino put in their attacks on the 23rd of May 1944 at the Adolf Hitler Line in the Liri Valley. As a result the only units who fly the battle honour "Monte Cassino" will be those of the 1st Canadian Armoured Brigade (1940-1945). All other units of the 1st Canadian Corps will fly the battle honour entitled "Liri Valley".

I will admit however that when I was firing off that list I mentioned earlier, I was just drawing Battles from the top of my head. I did forget several, including all Naval and Air Battles. The Liri Valley, Bastonge, and many others should be on that list. As I said, I was just spitballing.


I really enjoy your long posts, I have certainly lost patience after 8000 posts. I'm somewhat of a history buff, not so much military history unless battles reach "mythical" proportion which always leads me to believe there is a touch of nationalism involved. Rather than getting off topic, how about we engage in some historical debate in the History Forum? We can start with WWII if you fancy.

Well i'm glad you aren't bloody bored to death bud. If you want dicuss history (not only military I might add), feel free to fire up a thread, you could even call it "come love me Mogz" and i'll show up. Sound like a plan?