Thank you for letting me know your views on it s_lone.
Personally I found it to be fairly boring. While it holds some value as living tableau art... watching a moving painting essentially... the artist's descriptions of his own work (ie, fierce, funny, pitch black), don't come anywhere near to accurate from what my eye sees. His intent gets lost in his props and makeup, as his intent to show soldiers as toys and puppets, gets completely overshadowed by his makeup and expression (which are what people look most closely at in acting), which quite clearly present them instead as clowns. Thus his attempt at an 'hommage' instead comes across quite plainly to this particular 'redneck' as a mockery of their deaths. Hearing your words of what he's trying to portray, seeing his attempts with his props, it looks to me s_lone like a mark he missed by quite a ways.
And one further recommendation... when presenting synopses of one's works, you might want to tell him to avoid using the style of a reviewer. It is not to him or those close to him to say it's fierce, funny, wonderful, etc. The artist merely is to state what they are presenting and leave it to the audience and the reviewers to decide its attributes. Reviewers and the theatres which hire out for these festivals, tend to look poorly on artists who attempt to form their opinion for them on a piece, and even on the internet it's no different.
All that being said... he has more courage than I, and no performer I know (and I do know quite a few), has won them all. Pieces can be wrong for the audience, wrong for the time, or just plain wrong. One never knows, and never learns, until they are out there trying.