Punk spoke up for angry kids. Why won't today's bands follow suit?

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Interesting article up on Guardian about the Clash and recent London Riots, etc..

Punk spoke up for angry kids. Why won't today's bands follow suit?

Last Tuesday, copies of the latest NME magazine hit the shelves of any central London newsagent that was still open for trade following the previous night's unrest. On the cover was a 1976 image of the Clash, to mark the 35th anniversary of punk's explosion in London. Inside was a reprint of Barry Miles's first interview with the band: "They talk of the boredom of living in the council high-rise blocks, of living at home with parents, of dole queues, of the mind-destroying jobs offered to unemployed school-leavers. They talk […] of how there is nothing to do."

Later, as London smouldered, the irony of the Clash – a band forever associated with riot and protest – being on the cover of NME again was all too obvious. But while it would have been satisfying to draw parallels between the Clash's revolutionary tub-thumping of 1976 and the incendiary events of the week, the reality wasn't so neat. The basic facts of being young, broke and bored in London and beyond might not have changed much since those days, but everything else Mick Jones and Joe Strummer described has.

"I think people ought to know that we're anti-fascist, we're anti-violence, we're anti-racist and we're procreative. We're against ignorance," said Strummer, when asked how his band was offering a solution to their boredom and frustration. "I don't have to get drunk every night and go around kicking people and smashing up phone boxes […] We're dealing with subjects we really believe to matter. We're hoping to educate any kid who comes to listen to us."

If that was punk's manifesto in 1976, then here's the closest thing music has to one in 2011: "Kill People. Burn ****. **** School." It's a song by Odd Future Wolf Gang Kill Them All, whose apathetic anarchy is perhaps a more fitting, if unwitting, soundtrack to the riots of last week than the Clash's. Odd Future, for the uninitiated, are a controversial LA rap collective led by Tyler the Creator – a middle-class drop-out and pop culture anti-hero beloved of hipsters and indie-rock fans. I'm not dissing Tyler: unlike Strummer, he didn't ask to be a mouthpiece for a generation. And like the kids torching and looting family-run shops in their own neighbourhoods, he's the first to concede he doesn't have anything much to say. He just likes causing a disturbance, however pointless.

This, though, is apparently what rebellion sounds like in 2011: dead-eyed, mob-like and opportunistic. There's certainly no one else currently trying to articulate anything more meaningful in pop culture. Time was when rock stars, and not just the Clash, used to have lots to say about lots of very big, important things. Or so I'm told. The truth is that in my eight years as a music journalist, I've never found one.

Let's look at some of the likely candidates. Alex Turner: lyricist of a generation, everyday commentator extraordinaire, brilliant on chip shops, less so on council spending cuts. Here's what he told me last time I interviewed him, at the time of the student protests and trade-union marches: "Even though [some of our songs] are about 'what's going on' in, like, one part of town, it's not about 'WHAT'S GOING ON', is it? It's not like I'm showing an opinion on what's going on. I just don't know what that would achieve." Or Eton-educated folkie and former Black Bloc anarchist Frank Turner: "I'm uncomfortable being called 'political'. I don't want to be divisive."

Meanwhile, Dizzee Rascal long ago discovered that it was far more commercially rewarding to write about his bonkers showbiz lifestyle than the east London estate he grew up on, and chronicled so extraordinarily on his early albums.

None of these artists are stupid. In fact, they're among the most intelligent we've got. And I don't really believe they haven't got opinions about the big, important things, as well. But I do think there is a stigma attached to caring about those things enough to be outspoken, challenging and – yes – occasionally wrong about them. Just listen to the guffaws the once-credible MIA now incites after one-too-many politically misguided Twitter controversies ("I'm going down to the riot," she tweeted last week, "to hand out tea and Mars bars"). So now no one says anything at all. And then we all wake up and wonder where the art of genuine protest has gone.

Of course, we didn't need last week's riots to tell us there is a huge gulf between what musicians today are writing about and the realities of the streets. But they did throw the problem into even sharper relief than ever. The Clash may have spoken for a highly politicised UK in 1976, but they don't have anything to say to the disenfranchised and desensitised youth of 2011. Unless someone is prepared to stand up in their place and start screaming soon, this generation is in danger of losing its voice altogether – or, worse still, ending up with Tyler the Creator and his blank nihilism as its legacy. And not even he wants that.

Punk spoke up for angry kids. Why won't today's bands follow suit | Music | The Guardian
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Today it's all corporate. Big difference between the old grass roots development of bands.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
While punk music had much to say about socio-political conditions in the UK at that time and what lies in the future, I would go back to the movie ''Look Back In Anger'' as the true beginning of this type of artistic expression:

IMDb - Look Back in Anger (1959)

from wiki:

''Look Back in Anger (1956) is a John Osborne play—made into films in 1959, 1980, and 1989 -- about a love triangle involving an intelligent but disaffected young man (Jimmy Porter), his upper-middle-class, impassive wife (Alison), and her haughty best friend (Helena Charles). Cliff, an amiable Welsh lodger, attempts to keep the peace. The play was a success on the London stage, and spawned the term "angry young men" to describe Osborne and those of his generation who employed harshness and realism in the theatre in contrast to the more escapist fare previously seen.''

Unlike Americans, the British are not quite as inhibited in making expressions of this kind out in the open. As for what they actually did about these conditions, well, that's quite another story.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
With today's headlines dealing with social protests over the many injustices going on, I thought about this thread and how we are not seeing a punk music revival to answer some of those issues. Looks like no such revival is in sight. Indeed, the genre had undergone a tremendous 'cleanup' (if you will) without the social commentary it once had.


The 5 great eras of pop-punk, from the ’70s to today - Alternative Press
 

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
Meh, if you're judging today's music by what you hear on the radio, you are missing a lot of rgeat music. There was some fantastic music in the early 70s. But if you switched on the radio you were more likely to hear "Candy Man" or 'Popcorn."

Billy Talent has some pretty cool revolution rock. Good Candian kids too. Take a listen to Viking Death March, or Surprise Surprise.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,367
11,433
113
Low Earth Orbit
"They talk of the boredom of living in the council high-rise blocks, of living at home with parents, of dole queues, of the mind-destroying jobs offered to unemployed school-leavers. They talk […] of how there is nothing to do.
"Wow man. That's heavy. He soooo nailed it."
 

eh1eh

Blah Blah Blah
Aug 31, 2006
10,749
103
48
Under a Lone Palm
Today it's all corporate. Big difference between the old grass roots development of bands.

That is being turned on it's head big time now. The corporate sh1t is on the wane.
Peruse youtube. Music development at the grass roots is alive and well Some are saying no to record companies.
The fragmentation of the market makes finding what you like more difficult but once you tap into something
it usually leads to another and another.
The days of 'record exec-u-jive' are done. Artists are selling their music themselves.
Promoting tours and selling their own merchandise. Many are even making a living at it.
So really today's young bands are too busy doing business to fuk around whining about the
Queen's Fanny, the tax man, and society's failings in general.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
That is being turned on it's head big time now. The corporate sh1t is on the wane.
Peruse youtube. Music development at the grass roots is alive and well Some are saying no to record companies.
The fragmentation of the market makes finding what you like more difficult but once you tap into something
it usually leads to another and another.
The days of 'record exec-u-jive' are done. Artists are selling their music themselves.
Promoting tours and selling their own merchandise. Many are even making a living at it.
So really today's young bands are too busy doing business to fuk around whining about the
Queen's Fanny, the tax man, and society's failings in general.
Youtube is all garageband and basement stuff. Everyone playing for basically nothing. The music scene is completely dead except for managed acts.