#31
Re: The Big Bang Theory....Simplified?
Feb 21st, 2011
requires
serious attention.
Herein, it is important to give a clarification of Crothers’
solution from the viewpoint of a theoretical physicist whose
professional field is the General Theory of Relativity. The
historical aspect of the black hole problem will not be discussed
as this has been suciently addressed in the scientific
literature and, especially, in a historical review [3]. The
technical details of Crothers’ solution will also not be reanalyzed:
his calculations were reviewed by many professional
relativists prior to publication in Progress in Physics. These
reviewers had a combined forty years of professional employment
in this field and it is thus extremely unlikely that a formal
error exists within Crothers’ work. Rather, our attention
will be focused only upon clarification of the new result in
comparison to the classical solution in Schwarzschild space.
In other words, the main objective is to answer the question:
what have Abrams and Crothers achieved?
In this letter,--
Gravitational collapse
as the ultimate condition in Scwarzschild space leads to black
holes outside a real physical space, with the consequence that
the black hole solution in Schwarzschild space has no real
meaning (despite the fact that it can be formally obtained).
Mathematical curiosities are always interesting, but if these
things have no real meaning, then one must make it clear in
the end. Consequently, the current mathematical treatment
of black holes in Schwarzschild space does not have physical
validity in nature, as Crothers explains.
(so there are no black holes in physical space which in my thinking also eliminates the singularity of the Big Bang)DB
--
the myth of the big bang with pictures
“It seems likely that red-shift may not be
due to an expanding Universe, and much
of the speculations on the structure of the
universe may require reexamination.”
Edwin Hubble 1947
(the big bang is science fraud taught as reality) DB
serious attention.
Herein, it is important to give a clarification of Crothers’
solution from the viewpoint of a theoretical physicist whose
professional field is the General Theory of Relativity. The
historical aspect of the black hole problem will not be discussed
as this has been suciently addressed in the scientific
literature and, especially, in a historical review [3]. The
technical details of Crothers’ solution will also not be reanalyzed:
his calculations were reviewed by many professional
relativists prior to publication in Progress in Physics. These
reviewers had a combined forty years of professional employment
in this field and it is thus extremely unlikely that a formal
error exists within Crothers’ work. Rather, our attention
will be focused only upon clarification of the new result in
comparison to the classical solution in Schwarzschild space.
In other words, the main objective is to answer the question:
what have Abrams and Crothers achieved?
In this letter,--
Gravitational collapse
as the ultimate condition in Scwarzschild space leads to black
holes outside a real physical space, with the consequence that
the black hole solution in Schwarzschild space has no real
meaning (despite the fact that it can be formally obtained).
Mathematical curiosities are always interesting, but if these
things have no real meaning, then one must make it clear in
the end. Consequently, the current mathematical treatment
of black holes in Schwarzschild space does not have physical
validity in nature, as Crothers explains.
(so there are no black holes in physical space which in my thinking also eliminates the singularity of the Big Bang)DB
--
the myth of the big bang with pictures
“It seems likely that red-shift may not be
due to an expanding Universe, and much
of the speculations on the structure of the
universe may require reexamination.”
Edwin Hubble 1947
(the big bang is science fraud taught as reality) DB
Last edited by darkbeaver; Feb 21st, 2011 at 07:17 PM..
Halton Arp received his bachelors degree from Harvard College in 1949 and his Ph.D. from the California Institute of Technology in 1953, both cum laude. For 29 years he was a staff astronomer at the Observatories known originally as the Mt. Wilson and Palomar Observatories.