One big idea is missing in Physics.


socratus
#1
One big idea is missing in Physics.
===…
“ . . . . . at least one big idea is missing.
How do we find that missing idea? “
/ Book: “ The trouble with Physics” By Lee Smolin, page 308 /

What is “the big missing idea ” ?
The big missing idea in Physics is the endless infinite void – the Vacuum,
the Zero Vacuum: T=0K.

When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum,
that endless infinite void.
Nothingness of Space Could Illuminate the Theory of Everything | DiscoverMagazine.com (external - login to view)
==============…

“ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? “
/ Paul Dirac /
#
"Vacuum -- the very name suggests emptiness and nothingness –
is actually a realm rife with potentiality, courtesy of the laws
of quantum electrodynamics (QED). According to QED,
additional, albeit virtual, particles can be created in the vacuum,
allowing light-light interactions."
www.aip.org/pnu/2006/768.html (external - login to view)
#
“The most fundamental question facing 21st century physics will be:
What is the vacuum? As quantum mechanics teaches us, with
its zero point energy this vacuum is not empty and the word
vacuum is a gross misnomer!”
/ Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg /
#
"Now we know that the vacuum can have all sorts of wonderful effects
over an enormous range of scales, from the microscopic to the cosmic,"
said Peter Milonni
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
#
etc . . . . .
===============…
 
socratus
#2
Sorry, it seems that the “big idea” is not missing in Physics,
it has been banned from Physics.
=.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ . Page 138.
By Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /

====…
 
socratus
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by socratusView Post

Sorry, it seems that the “big idea” is not missing in Physics,
it has been banned from Physics.
=.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ . Page 138.
By Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /

====…

But . . . .
S. Weinberg wrote another book: “The First Three Minutes”
(A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe . . . after big bang)
So, he know very well that in 1973 the temperature of the Universe
as whole was 2,7K and in the time “X” it will come to absolute zero.
But if the “temperatures below absolute zero simple have no meaning”
then . . . “ Big Bang” also doesn’t have meaning.
Someone must decide: “Where is logic in our Alice's Wonderland?”
===============…
 
socratus
#4
Brief characteristic of Vacuum: T=0K.
==================================
1.
It was, it is, it will be forever an infinite /eternal continuum T=0K.
The Material World began its existence and evolution from T=0K.
2.
Today physicists think that the Universe as whole has temperature:
T= 2,7K. They know very well that parameter T=2,7K is not constant.
It is temporal and goes down and in the future it will come to T= 0K.
But they don’t know what to do with infinite T=0K and therefore
banned T=0K from logical thought.
3.
T=0K is not empty / void infinite continuum.
The void/vacuum T=0K gives birth to an infinite numbers of
virtual particles (antiparticles, dark matter , dark energy and “zoo”
of elementary particles) and they exist in this Kingdom of Vacuum.
4.
Question:
Which geometrical form can have virtual particles (antiparticles,
dark matter , dark energy and “zoo” of elementary particles)
in the absolute reference frame T= 0K ?

The answer is: “They must be flat particles.”
Why?
Because absolute endless infinite void - vacuum T=0K obeys the
laws of “Ideal Gas” and therefore . . . according to Charle’s law
(and the consequence of the third law of thermodynamics) as the
thermodynamic temperature of a system approaches absolute zero
the volume of particles approach zero too.
It means the particles at T=0K must have flat forms.
The most ideal flat geometrical form is form of circle: pi= c /d =3,14 . . . .
These circle –particles are without thickness. It means, we cannot reach
the T=0K and we cannot reach the density of these vacuum-particles.
We cannot observe vacuum - particles with tools, but thanks to
mathematics (physical-mathematical laws) we can understand their
real geometrical forms.
#
The “strings particles” is also flat particles and don’t have thickness.
But to be “string” is needed forces in two different sides.
Without forces the “string” will take form of circle.
And in circle all forces in all different directions are equal and
therefore the circle–particle is in an ideal equilibrium (potential) state.
Such equilibrium-potential state can be changed easily with a
thin/weak quantum force.
Once again.
Circle-particle says to string-particles: “I am, circle, the real quantum
particle and my existence is confirmed by physical-mathematical laws
and you, string, don’t have such laws, such confirmation. You are only
private invention of theoretical thought.”
5.
When very small changes appear in absolute void of “Ideal Gas”
( T=0K ) something was happened. Pressures, densities,
temperatures were changed and can be observed.
(Casimir effect, vacuum polarization, Lamb shift, . . ..etc.)
These “very small changes” are Quantum changes.
These very small Quantum changes ( h and h*bar) make great
difference in the Kingdom of Absolute Vacuum and Nature.
====. . .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus.
=============…
Attached Images
absolute zero.jpg (8.3 KB, 0 views)
 
55Mercury
+1
#5  Top Rated Post

(external - login to view)hi Izzy, long time no quantum! nice to see you boggling minds again! lol

Quote:

The “strings particles” is also flat particles and don’t have thickness.
But to be “string” is needed forces in two different sides.
Without forces the “string” will take form of circle.
And in circle all forces in all different directions are equal and
therefore the circle–particle is in an ideal equilibrium (potential) state.

what comes around goes around, eh?
(and everyone knows π r round)
;?)

Quote:

Vacuum -- the very name suggests emptiness and nothingness –
is actually a realm rife with potentiality, courtesy of the laws
of quantum electrodynamics (QED)

Interesting that the acronym matches the Latin phrase quod erat demonstrandum, meaning "which is what had to be proven". Does anyone suppose that's just a coincidence, or is it more likely that those who contemplate such matters are just fvcking with our heads? lol

Quote:

Sorry, it seems that the “big idea” is not missing in Physics,
it has been banned from Physics.
=.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ . Page 138.
By Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979

notwithstanding that the term 'absolute' implies it's as low as it can go, it may be worth considering these experts really aren't sufficiently intelligent enough to find a meaning on the negative side of 0° K

but I think this whole exercise in mental masturbation is about as fruitful as trying to determine the last decimal place of π.
I should think one might get tired of it somewhere beyond the billionth decimal place heh heh

perhaps Weinberg is merely conceding that lower temperatures are meaningless in the sense that they'll permit no life to exist to contemplate them, as I similarly suggested in post #30 of one of your old threads, and that they are therefore quite moot:

forums.canadiancontent.net/sc...t-garbage.html (external - login to view)

post #29

Time , Particles and Consciousness.
=.
We have biological consciousness and
we have consciousness on the quantum level

What is connection between biological consciousness
and the consciousness on the quantum level ?

What is role of time in this connection between biological
consciousness and the consciousness on the quantum level ?

What is happened with time in this connection ?
What can happen with time in this connection ?
1
Can we speak about biological and quantum consciousness
without particles (cells and em waves) ?
The answer is 'no'.
2
Can we talk about time without particles?
a)
According to Newton the answer is
'yes, we can talk about time without particles'
b)
According to Einstein the answer is
'no, without particles we cannot talk about time'

Paradox or puzzle ?
3
Does biological consciousness exist only in time?
Does consciousness on the quantum level exist only in time?
!!??
===..
socratus

Post #30

biological consciousness implies life. life regardless of duration exists from time A to time B. if time stands still, life stands still, biological consciousness stands still. conclusion? biological consciousness cannot exist without time.



I believe Newton is correct, that time can exist without particles (necessary for biology) though Einstein is also right in the context that if there is nothing around(no life)(life) to detect it(time) then what is it, really? a second would equal eternity, and eternity would equal a second. perhaps this is the pressing point of life's beginning?



I wonder how God was doing in that eternal second before life evolved from time? God equals the total energy of the universe. Before matter there was only energy without time (the eternal second). When God transformed Itself in part to matter (the big bang?) the stage was set for time and life to progress/evolve (not but a second ago)



The Holy Trinity: Energy/Time/Life



lol stupid fvcking edit feature Last edited by 55Mercury; Sep 15th, 2012 at 04:57 AM..Reason: God made me do it




Quote:

But . . . . S. Weinberg wrote another book: “The First Three Minutes” (A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe . . . after big bang) So, he know very well that in 1973 the temperature of the Universe as whole was 2,7K and in the time “X” it will come to absolute zero. But if the “temperatures below absolute zero simple have no meaning” then . . . “ Big Bang” also doesn’t have meaning. Someone must decide: “Where is logic in our Alice's Wonderland?”


Well if my eternal second analogy (pre-big-bang) could still apply, I'd say those first 3 minutes could be 30 million years - now extrapolate that to God's 6 days of genisis. where is the logic? I've decided Gracie's dormouse is right - feed your head: these deep thinkers will need to eat a sh!tload more of those polka dot mushrooms to firm up their thinking. lol



httpwwwyoutubecomwatchvWANNqr-vcx0

Last edited by 55Mercury; Jun 27th, 2016 at 05:24 AM..
 
55Mercury
#6
Post #30

biological consciousness implies life.
life regardless of duration exists from time A to time B.
if time stands still, life stands still, biological consciousness stands still.
conclusion? biological consciousness cannot exist without time.
Last edited by 55Mercury; Jun 27th, 2016 at 05:18 AM..
 
55Mercury
#7
**** remove this fu<king edit bug!
 
55Mercury
#8
ffs......................
*throws arms up in the air*


underfvckingbelievalbe!
Last edited by 55Mercury; Jun 27th, 2016 at 05:48 AM..
 
socratus
#9
Does Socratus write an unintelligent garbage?
====.

@55Mercury

If idea was banned then, of course, all followers will be banned too.
===.
 
socratus
#10
Not standard model of physics.
==..
In the study of particle physics, the most powerful tool is
the accelerator. Two most important things need for accelerator:
high energy and deep vacuum.
The higher the energy and the deeper the vacuum levels that
can be reached – and the tinier the structures that can be explored.
#
The picture of modern particle physics is saddled with Standard Model.
The Standard Model embraces a total of 18 particles.
Thanks to accelerators more than 20 Nobel Prizes have been awarded
to scientists who contributed to the Standard Model.
====…
a)
If the accelerator is model of Nature then Nature itself must have
infinite high energy and the deepest vacuum level. Then there isn’t
place for the hot (!) singular point as beginning of existence.
b)
Temperature requires separation and movement of particles.
A singularity is defined as to have no separation, no movement.
Without movement there isn’t temperature.
c)
The high density of singular point is equal to the singular point of deep
vacuum, therefor it is possible that nature started from singular point of
vacuum, it means from singular quantum particle in the point of vacuum.
d)
The deepest vacuum level in Nature is the cosmic vacuum: T=0K.
This deepest vacuum (T=0K) is itself some kind of infinite energy.
This infinite energy gives birth to “virtual particles”: E=Mc^2.
These virtual particles” was called “dark matter and dark energy”.
“Dark masses and energy” of these “virtual particles” are more
than 90% in the nature and they created a few % of visual matter
in Nature.
============…
 
petros
#11
Is the universe just a cavitation? Nature abhors a vaccum and the collapse is more energetic than the expansion.

I'm glad it's in slow motion or I'd miss it.
 
Angstrom
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by socratusView Post

One big idea is missing in Physics.
===…
“ . . . . . at least one big idea is missing.
How do we find that missing idea? “
/ Book: “ The trouble with Physics” By Lee Smolin, page 308 /

What is “the big missing idea ” ?
The big missing idea in Physics is the endless infinite void – the Vacuum,
the Zero Vacuum: T=0K.

When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum,
that endless infinite void.
Nothingness of Space Could Illuminate the Theory of Everything | DiscoverMagazine.com (external - login to view)
==============…

“ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? “
/ Paul Dirac /
#
"Vacuum -- the very name suggests emptiness and nothingness –
is actually a realm rife with potentiality, courtesy of the laws
of quantum electrodynamics (QED). According to QED,
additional, albeit virtual, particles can be created in the vacuum,
allowing light-light interactions."
www.aip.org/pnu/2006/768.html (external - login to view)
#
“The most fundamental question facing 21st century physics will be:
What is the vacuum? As quantum mechanics teaches us, with
its zero point energy this vacuum is not empty and the word
vacuum is a gross misnomer!”
/ Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg /
#
"Now we know that the vacuum can have all sorts of wonderful effects
over an enormous range of scales, from the microscopic to the cosmic,"
said Peter Milonni
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
#
etc . . . . .
===============…

The whole is more then the sum of its parts.
 
socratus
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by socratusView Post

Not standard model of physics.
==..
In the study of particle physics, the most powerful tool is
the accelerator. Two most important things need for accelerator:
high energy and deep vacuum.
The higher the energy and the deeper the vacuum levels that
can be reached – and the tinier the structures that can be explored.
#
The picture of modern particle physics is saddled with Standard Model.
The Standard Model embraces a total of 18 particles.
Thanks to accelerators more than 20 Nobel Prizes have been awarded
to scientists who contributed to the Standard Model.
====…
a)
If the accelerator is model of Nature then Nature itself must have
infinite high energy and the deepest vacuum level. Then there isn’t
place for the hot (!) singular point as beginning of existence.
b)
Temperature requires separation and movement of particles.
A singularity is defined as to have no separation, no movement.
Without movement there isn’t temperature.
c)
The high density of singular point is equal to the singular point of deep
vacuum, therefor it is possible that nature started from singular point of
vacuum, it means from singular quantum particle in the point of vacuum.
d)
The deepest vacuum level in Nature is the cosmic vacuum: T=0K.
This deepest vacuum (T=0K) is itself some kind of infinite energy.
This infinite energy gives birth to “virtual particles”: E=Mc^2.
These virtual particles” was called “dark matter and dark energy”.
“Dark masses and energy” of these “virtual particles” are more
than 90% in the nature and they created a few % of visual matter
in Nature.
============…

Does Socratus write an unintelligent garbage?
forums.canadiancontent.net/sc...t-garbage.html (external - login to view)
 
Curious Cdn
#14
One big idea is missing in Physics.









God.
 
socratus
#15
If the accelerator (for example LHC) is model of the Universe,
doesn’t it mean that the Universe as a whole must have
infinite energy and the deepest vacuum T = 0K?
===.
Attached Images
LHC.jpg (5.4 KB, 0 views)
 
socratus
#16
One Sisyphus project in modern Physics.
=====…
Scientists try to unify four fundamental forces:
electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity.
a)
In 1979 the Nobel Prize was awarded to physicists who
merged electromagnetic and the weak nuclear forces in a single
framework: electroweak theory.
b)
Uniting the strong force with the electroweak picture has not been easy.
However, many physicists believe that at very high energies, the
electroweak and the strong forces would behave as one.
That unification is known as the search for a “grand unified theory”
c)
The theory that may finally include all four fundamental forces as one
(electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity) is known as the search
for a “theory of everything”.
============…
My opinion.
So, on a large macro cosmic scale scientists gathered all masses and
energies into “ singular point” and on a micro scale this picture repeat
itself when scientists try to merge all four forces at very high
energies as one.
I call this scientific plan to understand micro world as a “Sisyphus project”.
Why?
Because behavior of particles at very high energies was explained
by Paul Dirac in 1928. According to Dirac at a “sea of vacuum”
quantum particles (forces) will be changed into virtual particles
with negative energy / mass: -E= Mc^2. (!)
This “sea of vacuum” is infinite continuum and it is some kind of
infinite energy and it is full with infinite numbers of particles: –E=Mc^2.
From these Dirac’s negative particles the creation and evolution of
existence was started. From Dirac’s negative energy / mass -E= Mc^2
“the theory of everything” begins its way.
====…
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
===…
 
socratus
#17
You can test and understand scientific plan to unify all four forces
(electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity) at very high energies
into one singular force in your home conditions:
a) take four eggs ,
b) break them,
c) make omelet with homogeneous structure,
d) try to understand, what chicken is.

Good appetite.
And remember, in our eggs – our forces (more than four).
=====…
 
MHz
#18
Great way to pass the time over the first cup of coffee.

Whatever we consider the vacuum to be at the present it was lower before in the finite universe than it was in the past and as time progresses it will become greater as galaxies implode and the distances between them become greater. The best 'vacuum' at the moment is the 'space' that the universe is expanding into. Since that will end up will all galaxies collapsed and the distances betweem them at it's greatest that would more of a vacuum as long as that trend continued.

As the universe expands the reforming of stars from material from other galaxies will not happen so the number of visible stars will decrease until there are no points of light that can be seen. Light is heat so all the visible light amounts to a certain amount of heat that is added to the temperature of the universe. When no stars are shedding light then they no longer shed heat (for the most part) and that would mean the universe is getting colder at least until that event is completed.

One sugar or two?

Quote: Originally Posted by socratusView Post

d) try to understand, what chicken is.

Pissed is what she is as you just ate her children after torturing them with fire.
 
darkbeaver
#19
The Nobel price is surrendering reason and Cern is a pile of scrap metal.
 
Ludlow
#20
Microwave ovens are destroying the world and ruining good food.
 
MHz
#21
You have been looking at Russian documents haven't you Comrade??
Why Did Russia Ban The Use Of Microwave Ovens? | Soren Dreier (external - login to view)
 
socratus
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by socratusView Post

You can test and understand scientific plan to unify all four forces
(electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity) at very high energies
into one singular force in your home conditions:
a) take four eggs ,
b) break them,
c) make omelet with homogeneous structure,
d) try to understand, what chicken is.

Good appetite.
And remember, in our eggs – our forces (more than four).
=====…

To have an omelet takes an outside energy source to make it happen.
Exactly in this way the physicists work.
They use outside energy and deep vacuum (LHC) to create
new quantum particles.
They don’t think about nature of energy itself.
As Feynman said:
“ It is important to realize that in physics today,
we have no knowledge of what energy is.
We do not have a picture that energy comes in little
blobs of a definite amount.”
============…
Again.
LHC needs deep vacuum and high energy to create new tiny
quantum particles. If LHC is model of the Universe then the
absolute vacuum T= 0K with infinite energy can also create
tiny quantum particles: -E=Mc^2.
And . . . if LHC isn’t model of the Universe (!) . . .
. . then . . . why we need this big machine.
===========…
 
socratus
#23
Scientific logic. / by Socratus /
===…
Part one: macro – cosmic scientific logic.
a)
14 billion years ago the billions and billions of galaxies were
compressed into a “hot singular point”. It means that the four
forces of nature (electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity) also
were compressed into one “singular point”- into one “singular force”.
b)
During the earliest moments following big bang explosion –
- roughly the first 10^-43 seconds – the temperature and density
of the universe had cooled to a balmy 10^15 degrees Celsius
and the four forces of nature went their separate ways.

Part two: micro – quantum scientific logic.

Scientists try to unify four fundamental forces of nature:
a)
In 1979 the Nobel Prize was awarded to physicists who
merged electromagnetic and the weak nuclear forces in a single
framework: electroweak theory.
“The existence of the electroweak interactions was experimentally
established in two stages, the first being the discovery of neutral
currents in neutrino scattering by the Gargamelle collaboration in 1973,
and the second in 1983 by the UA1 and the UA2 collaborations that
involved the discovery of the W and Z gauge bosons in
proton–antiproton collisions at the converted Super Proton Synchrotron.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroweak_interaction (external - login to view)
b)
Physicists believe that at very high energies, the electroweak and
the strong forces would behave as one.
That unification is known as the search for a “grand unified theory”
c)
Physicists believe that at very – very high energies (!) all four
fundamental forces of nature would behave as one. That project
is known as the search for a “theory of everything”.
============…
My conclusion.
At the earth’s conditions we cannot reach the cosmic conditions.
It means we cannot merge all four fundamental forces of nature.
It means we don’t need more powerful LHC (useless machine)
It means the CERN project can be taken in archives.
=============…

“But I don’t want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can’t help that," said the Cat:
"we’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad."
"How do you know I’m mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn’t have come here.”
― Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland

==============…
 
darkbeaver
#24
Quote:

socratus;2335026]Scientific logic. / by Socratus /
c)
Physicists believe that at very – very high energies (!) all four
fundamental forces of nature would behave as one. That project
is known as the search for a “theory of everything”.
============…
My conclusion.
At the earth’s conditions we cannot reach the cosmic conditions.
It means we cannot merge all four fundamental forces of nature.
It means we don’t need more powerful LHC (useless machine)
It means the CERN project can be taken in archives.
=============…

Berkeley Lab Builds a Desktop Particle Accelerator | Popular Science (external - login to view)

www.popsci.com/.../berkeley-lab-building- (external - login to view)desktop-particle-accelerator


Jun 30, 2009 - Giant particle accelerators like the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) have become the poster children for big science. Immense in size, cost, and ...
 
socratus
#25
a) At first scientists compressed all masses and forces
into a “hot singular point”.
b) Then they separated all masses and forces in their ways.
c) Today they want compressed all forces into one single force.
d) Remember: in the Alice’s Wonderland the people in the
cosmology, gravity and particle programs don’t ask question
“Where did the masses and forces (for singularity, big bang
and existence) come from?”
====..
 
socratus
#26
#
Another example of scientific “logic” as logic of science:
What big bang creates black hole takes away . . . (into singular point?)
========…
 
darkbeaver
#27
The biggest idea is the universe. Means everything in the cosmological unit. There is no outside.
 
Ludlow
#28
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaverView Post

The biggest idea is the universe. Means everything in the cosmological unit. There is no outside.

Have a bowl of fruit loops
 
socratus
#29
T=0K and Reality.
==..
a)
We cannot reach the absolute vacuum T=0K by experiments
but this physical fact doesn’t say that the absolute vacuum is
hollow inside.
b)
In absolute vacuum exists infinite numbers of potential “virtual
particles”. We cannot reach the density and other parameters of
“virtual particles” by experiments but this physical fact doesn’t
say that these “virtual particles” are pure abstraction.
The examples:
#
“ Its effects can be observed in various phenomena
(such as spontaneous emission, the Casimir effect, the
van der Waals bonds, or the Lamb shift), and it is thought
to have consequences for the behavior of the Universe
on cosmological scales. “
/ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy (external - login to view)

#
Theoreticians say that leaving our ‘atomistic- matter’
paradigm behind, and taking ‘virtual antiparticles’,
we realized that the Cosmos / Vacuum ‘polarized ‘
itself, and the result of this polarization we know as our world.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_polarization (external - login to view)

#
In quantum field theory, and specifically quantum electrodynamics,
vacuum polarization describes a process in which a background
electromagnetic field produces virtual electron–positron pairs that
change the distribution of charges and currents that generated
the original electromagnetic field. It is also sometimes referred
to as the self energy of the gauge boson (photon).
Vacuum polarization was observed experimentally in 1997 using
the TRISTAN particle accelerator in Japan.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_polarization (external - login to view)
#
Light Created from a Vacuum:
Casimir Effect Observed in Superconducting Circuit
/Science Daily (Nov. 18, 2011) /
www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1118133050.htm (external - login to view)
#
Chalmers scientists create light from vacuum
Chalmers scientists create light from vacuum | Chalmers (external - login to view)

==============…
 
socratus
#30
Can God create a Universe which physicists could not understand?
No.
Why?
Because at the moment when God began to create the material world,
He needed to use physical laws, formulas and equations. Then we can
come to the moment of His creation and grip His hand, look His features
and understand the picture of the Existence.
But here is one problem.
The problem is, that at the moment when we grip His hand,
He disappears (according to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle)
in His an infinite unseen house: T=0K.
So, we see the beginning of creation (quantum vacuum’s polarization /
fluctuation / transformation) but cannot understand the essence
of what is happened because physicists banned T=0K from Physics.
=======…
 

Similar Threads

15
Physics and Tautology.
by socratus | Aug 3rd, 2012
22
Laws Of Cat Physics
by Twila | Aug 5th, 2007
20
no new posts