God particles - without Nobel Prize. / by Socratus/

[socratus]

God particles - without Nobel Prize. / by Socratus/
==..
To discover so-called God - particle ( Nobel Prize in 2013)
was needed two conditions : deep vacuum and high energy.
But if the vacuum were deeperand energy were higher then
it would be possible to discoversome kind of a new God – particles.
Question: what is the deepestvacuum in the Universe?
My answer:
the deepest vacuum in the Universe is the cosmic zerovacuum T=0K.
Question: what can be thehighest energy?
My answer:
the cosmic zero vacuum T=0K continuum is itself some kind
of infinite energy continuum.
Using these parameters, I saythat the cosmic zero vacuum T=0K
can create primary God – particles and their names are
"potential molar –masses (k)particles."
==..
Question:
Why potential molar – masses (k)particles are primary God particles?
Because:
a)
Heat is result of some kind ofchaotic movements of particles.
In thermodynamics the heat isexplained by the formula: E=kT (logW)
It means that chaotic movementsof molar-mass (k) particles create heat.
b)
In 1905 Einstein wrote "quantum ofaction" as: h=kb
It means that molar-mass (k) particles knowsome kind of another
movement which can create "quantum of action" with energy E=(kb)*f.
My conclusion.
Without heat the Universe is anAbsolute Cold Kingdom.
Without "quantum ofaction" the Universe is dead continuum.
The molar-mass (k) particles cantake part in these two phenomenons:
E=kT (logW) and E= (kb)*f. And therefore the molar-mass (k)
particles are primary elements fromthe First Instant (T=0K) of the
Universe’s creation. Not " the famous Higgs Boson" (withthe low
energy and prestige Prize) but the old andmodest well-known
molar-mass k-particles are real "God particles"
#
k-particles have two forms ofmodifications: as a heat E=kT (logW)
and as an energy E=(kb)*f . The interaction between energy andheat
created everything in theUniverse but . . . . but until today nobody
explained the interaction between E= (kb)*f and E=kT (logW).
=====….
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
========….

 

[socratus]

Isn’t it amassing that theprimary and general principle of correlation
between heat and energy is basis for creation everythingin the Universe?
==..

 

[socratus]

Why the interaction between E= (kb)*f and E=kT (logW) wasn’t explained?
These k-particles belong to “ the theory ofideal gas” and this theory was
not enough seriously accepted by theoretical physicsbecause from the school
we studied that “ The theory of Ideal gas” is an abstract theory.
Andin my opinion “ The theory of Ideal gas” (with the temperature T=0K)
is an ideal model for Zero Vacuum and it is possible to use all laws and
formulasof “ideal gas” to understand processesin the zero vacuum: T=0K.
(ofcourse with the help of QT / SRT / QED )
===…

 

[socratus]

What result do I have using “ideal gas” to thezero vacuum?
One result (from many) is:
I can know the real geometricalform of quantum particles.
===…
Today the theoretical physics thinks aboutquantum particles
as a “point” or as a “ball” or as a “string”without to pay attention
on the reference frame where they exist. Butevery reference frame
creates its own form of existence. (RF of seacreates – fish and RF
of savanna creates another kindof living beings and conditions of existence)
a)
The geometrical form ofparticles as a “point” is a necessary and useful
mathematical model . . . but .. . not a real physical objects.
b)
The geometrical form of particles as a “ball” depends on specific
reference frame and specific forcesto create the “ball”.
c)
Because the quantum particleshave frequencies, it means that they
must somehow vibrate as a“string” theorists decided to try
to understand nature by using “string – particles”
(1-D line with Planck's length but withoutthickness) in a . . . .
mathematical 11-D. “String –particle” is only theoretical invitation:
there isn’t a physical law thatsays: “ . . . because . . . so . . .and so . . . .
particle must be string”.
Geometrical form of particlesas a “string” has many problems
as it is written in the book"The trouble with Physics" by Lee Smolin.
d)
Of many laws of “ideal gas” I will take one: Charles's law from
the1780s ( also known as the lawof volumes) and use it to zero
vacuum T=0K in order to understand the geometrical form of
quantum particle.
According to Jacques Charles’law (and the consequence of the
third lawof thermodynamics ) as the thermodynamictemperature
of a system approaches absolute zero the volume of particles
approach zero too. It means that theseparticles must have flat forms.
From all geometrical forms theform of a circle is most ideal and
symmetrical and it is written bythe formula: pi= c /d =3,14 . . . . .
In such condition the quantum k-molarparticles are ”virtual particles”
in . .. a virtual state, . . .in an equilibrium state . . . . in a relax state . .in a potential state .
To change this equilibrium stateneeds forces, quantum forces.
Without forces every flatquantum k-molar particle in T=0K must be
in a symmetrical equilibrium micro - circle state: c/d=pi=3,14 . . . . .
#
Once more.
Physicists don’t say that accordingto the law “X” or “Y” or “Z”
particles must be or “ball”, or“string” or “triangle”.
And I show concrete, specific law (s) that says which
concrete geometrical form quantum particles must have.
==========…
Israel Sadovnik Socratus