Philosophy of Physics / Science ?

[socratus]

Philosophy of Physics / Science ?

What photon is, what electron is, what proton is, what "ordinary particle" is.
1)
Poor Einstein had problem to understand " what photon is".
" All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer
to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken.'‘
/ Einstein. 1954. /
2)
There are many - many theories about what electron is.
All of them are problematical.
3)
Does proton really have many quarks and their brother antiquarks ?
4)
Where did mass of "ordinary particles" come from ?
=..
Hmm.
Say now: " we have philosophy of Physics / Science"
==.

 

[socratus]

Socratus philosophy.
=
It was, is, it will be forever an infinite, eternal, absolute reference frame T=0K.
On this infinite scene there are located gravity systems
on which human try to understand the reality.
==

 

[socratus]

Vacuum and his models.
=
Kirchhoff's black body - light go in and don't come back.
Black holes - light go in and don't come back.
Zero Vacuum - light go in and don't come back.
===
Black - holes have temperature about absolute zero
(60 nanokelvin - 60 billionths of a kelvin).
" Ideal Gas" has temperature T=0K.
The Cosmos as whole has temperature T=0K.
===
My conclusion.
a)
Kirchhoff's black body, black holes , "ideal gas" are models of zero vacuum.
b)
It seems that in the future heat death of the universe can come.
But thanks to Planck's and Hawking radiations ( vacuum fluctuation, tunneling barrier )
the Universe can escape heat death.
c)
All laws of an "ideal gas" and "quantum theory" can be used
to explain the primary conditions of the Existance.
====

 

[55Mercury]

It was, is, it will be forever an infinite, eternal, absolute reference frame T=0K.

all I know is 'C' is for 'cookie', and that's OK with me.

 

[socratus]

Mathematics and Physics.
=
It is said: Mathematics is a Queen of Science.
And this is correct.
But Physics is a King of Science.
The ideal situation is when King is married with Queen and they happily live in harmony.
=
King without Queen is a blind / uneducated man.
But without King all Queen's orders remain only theoretical possibilities / theories
on the paper. It is dangerous situation. It is crazy situation.
If King and Queen are pragmatic and rational beings then
to complete each other they must marry . . . on the one common basis.
The basis is:
a) there is an infinite, eternal, absolute reference frame T=0K.
b) the negative / imaginary quantum particles are as real particles
as positive Newtonian ones.
==
T=0K - zero vacuum and its models.
=
Kirchhoff's black body - light go in and don't come back.
Black holes - light go in and don't come back.
Zero Vacuum - light go in and don't come back.
===
Black - holes have temperature about absolute zero
(60 nanokelvin - 60 billionths of a kelvin).
" Ideal Gas" has temperature T=0K.
The Cosmos as whole has temperature T=0K.
===
My conclusion.
a)
Kirchhoff's black body, black holes , "ideal gas" are models of zero vacuum.
b)
It seems that in the future heat death of the universe can come.
But thanks to Planck's and Hawking radiations
( vacuum fluctuation, tunneling barrier )
the Universe can escape a heat death.
c)
All laws of an "ideal gas" and "quantum theory" can be used
to explain the primary / initial conditions of the Existence.
====

 

[socratus]

[FONT=&quot] Infinity: fact, fiction, solution.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]=.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Humans did not create physical laws.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Physical laws are independent from humans.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The physical laws were existed before the first physicist was born.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] Fact .[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The critical density of all mass in the Universe is so low that[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] it cannot “close” the Universe into sphere and therefore the[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] Universe as whole is “open” / “flat” , endless, infinite.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] Fiction .[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]This fact is dismissed / ignored by scientific community.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]They say: “ if in theory infinity appears – the theory is wrong.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Why physicists don’t adopt the “infinity” as a fact?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Because they don’t know that to do with “infinity”.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Infinity” means no borders. So, the problem is: [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“ how infinity can be limited ”[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] Solution. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]In my opinion, if “infinity” has concrete physical parameter (s)[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]then it is no problem to understand its function, its ability.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]=.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Zero vacuum is an infinite continuum in the condition T=0K.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Ideal gas” has the same condition : T=0K.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]According to the “Quantum theory” vacuum is some kind[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] of energetic / energy space. It is possible to use these two theories[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] in order to understand “the limits and abilities of infinity” and [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]the initial conditions of Existence.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]=====…[/FONT]

 

[MHz]

Philosophy of Physics / Science ?

What photon is, what electron is, what proton is, what "ordinary particle" is.
1)
Poor Einstein had problem to understand " what photon is".
" All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer
to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken.'‘
/ Einstein. 1954. /
2)
There are many - many theories about what electron is.
All of them are problematical.
3)
Does proton really have many quarks and their brother antiquarks ?
4)
Where did mass of "ordinary particles" come from ?
=..
Hmm.
Say now: " we have philosophy of Physics / Science"
==.

1. No Monsanto in their diet.

2. So are today's elections

3. Some wandered off after that cloud of smoke hit them. What was the question again?

4. The void started to gathere the some 40B years ago. (rounded off but it was a Thursday at 3:15

5. I also know why your post got so few replies. THE QUESTIONS ARE TOO HARD.

 

[socratus]

[FONT=&quot] About quantum impulse h and h*.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]1) [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Quantum particle has two (2) kinds of different impulses: (h) and (h*).[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2)[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] Quantum of light having impulse (h) travelling in a straight line with[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] constant speed c=1 has infinite wavelength it means its frequencies[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] aren’t limited.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]3) [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Quantum of light having impulse ( h*= h / 2pi ) will go in a curved path [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]( rotate around its axle / diameter ) and its speed will be more than constant (c >1) . [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]In this movement quantum of light has limited specific frequencies.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]4) [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]From the point of Earth gravity reference frame c=1 is maximal. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]From the point of Vacuum's reference frame c=1 is minimal. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] ( Tachyon theory )[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]5)[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] Frequency belongs to quantum particle with some geometrical form. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Maybe: point, string, loop, triangle , cone , cube, . . . . . . .[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]6)[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]To know what quantum of light is ( and its h and h* ) we need to know[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] its geometrical form. Quantum particle without geometrical form [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]is an abstract creation.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]7)[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]In 1900 Planck's wrote quantum of action as: [/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]h=E/t
(it means: there must be (phenomenologically must be ) some quantum action)
In 1905 Einstein wrote quantum of action as: [/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]h=kb.
(it means: there is (exactly there is ) quantum of action)
===[/FONT][FONT=&quot].[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Planck's constant (h, h*) belongs to the smallest and fundamental[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] particle of Nature: quantum of light. And Einstein wrote:[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“[/FONT][FONT=&quot]All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?' [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it,[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] but he is mistaken.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]”[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] ([/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT]Albert Einstein[FONT=&quot], [/FONT][FONT=&quot]1954[/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot])[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]===..[/FONT]

By the “theory” we were educated:
“ if we cannot observe physical phenomenon then it doesn't exist.
We can ignore this phenomenon. “
=.
There are two fundamental constants in nature: T=0K and
constant speed of photon: c-1.
1)
We cannot reach constant speed of photon c=1 but photon can
and ( thanks to Michelson ) it was observed and therefore it was accepted.
2)
We cannot reach T=0K, we cannot straight observe phenomena in T=0K.
Any instrument does not fit.
But this doesn’t mean that this continuum is abstract.
The “vacuum fluctuations / transformations” show that T=0K isn’t abstraction
and “virtual particles” exist there and they can change situation for observation.
3)
One fundamental constant ( c-1) after many years of doubt was adopted.
Sooner or later another fundamental constant of Nature: T=0K would be adopted too.
=======..

 

[socratus]

The idea "God" never will be disappearing.
=..
The ancient " Veda" or " Hermeticism " or . . .
Plato's "ideas", Kant's " thing- in- itself ", Leibniz's "monades" . . .:
" There is nothing new under the Sun." Old time - old ideas.
#
Today we have Quantum Mechanic.
On the basis of Quantum Mechanic we have genius scientific
technology but wrong / abstract philosophy of Quantum Theory.
Why?
First.
Quantum Mechanic has no Reference Frame.
Second.
Quantum Mechanic has one Hero –
- it is Quantum of light / Photon / Electron.
And Einstein wrote about quantum of light / photon :
" All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta? '
Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken."
Third.
The simple quantum particle - electron has six ( 6 ) formulas:
+E=Mc^2 and -E=Mc^2 , E=h*f , e^2=ah*c,
E=-me^4/2h*^2= -13,6eV and E= ∞.
Nobody knows "why?"
Nobody knows their correlation, how to unite them together.
=.
So, we have a wide field for speculations and it is possible to say:
The secret of God, Soul and Existence is hidden
in two (2) theories:
a) " Quantum theory of Vacuum " and
b) " The theory of Quantum of Light / Photon / Electron ".
But of course this speculative opinion must be tested by physicists
and the test is not simple.
==..
P.S.
“ One thing I have learned in a long life:
that all our science, measured against reality,
is primitive and childlike –
and yet it is the most precious thing we have.”
/ Einstein /
==========.

 

[socratus]

Long time ago Plato wrote:
" Mathematics is the language in which the gods speak to people."
/ Plato /
It means that religion without mathematical / physical background
can be fiction. It means that all different religions must have one
common mathematical / physical basis.
It means that Brahman, YHWH , God, Allah, . . . Supreme Creator,
the Supreme Being . . . and so on . . . . must know physical laws and
formulas to create Existence. Brahman, YHWH , God, Allah as the ONE (!)
cannot create Universe without physical laws and formulas.
#
Charles de Montesquieu wrote:
" Everybody creates his God according to his own image and spirit.
If triangles made a God they would give him three sides."
/ Charles de Montesquieu . Persian Letters, 1721 /
But if physicists make a God, they would give Him concrete
mathematical / physical parameters.
#
Eddington wrote:
The Reasons of a modern science give, maybe
the opportunity to make the conclusion
that the religion became acceptable
for sensible scientific mind, since 1927.
/A. S. Eddington /.
It means that from 1927 the modern science ( quantum theory )
can explain "religion" by math / physical laws and formulas.
It means that Quantum theory can explain not only the earthly
matters but the heavenly matters too and unite them together,
#
" Realistically, . . . . Physically. . . . "
“ Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.
If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you,
you haven't understood it yet.”
/ ― Niels Bohr /
If my idea hasn't shocked you, you haven't understood it yet.
=====.. .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
====.

 

[socratus]

P.S.
" The mathematics of QM is straightforward, but making the
connection between the mathematics and an intuitive picture
of the physical world is very hard"
/ Claude N. Cohen-Tannoudji . Nobel Prize in Physics 1997 /
Why? Because:
a) we don't know the reference frame of quantum theory
b) we don't know what quantum of light is.
The reference frame and quantum of light are the basis of
quantum theory all the rest is secondary.
And if the basis is wrong the philosophy of physics is vague.
==…

 

[socratus]

QM is very universal theory.
#
Some claim that QM has something to do with consciousness:
Quantum mind.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mind
#
Quantum brain dynamics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_brain_dynamics
#
Some tried to make parallels between the eastern mystic / spiritual
opinion and quantum physics.
( Fritjof Capra, David Bohm, John Polkinghorne . .. . )
#
Some believe that God exist only if . . . .
" If He understands Maths and Physics then He exists."
/ Frank Tipler. /
==…
So, in the way to understand QM we can meet many surprising things.
===…

 

[Twila]

QM is very universal theory.
#
Some claim that QM has something to do with consciousness:
Quantum mind.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mind
#
Quantum brain dynamics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_brain_dynamics
#
Some tried to make parallels between the eastern mystic / spiritual
opinion and quantum physics.
( Fritjof Capra, David Bohm, John Polkinghorne . .. . )
#
Some believe that God exist only if . . . .
" If He understands Maths and Physics then He exists."
/ Frank Tipler. /
==…
So, in the way to understand QM we can meet many surprising things.
===…

Can they prove that unicorns also exist with maths then? Cause if this is the case, somebodies learning the maths wrong.

 

[socratus]

Black holes mathematically impossible: Study
/ Sep 29, 2014 /
However, in her new work, Mersini-Houghton showed that
by giving off this radiation, the star also sheds mass.
So much so that as it shrinks it no longer has the density
to become a black hole.

Before a black hole can form, the dying star swells one last time and then explodes.
A singularity never forms and neither does an event horizon.

The take home message of the work is clear:
there is no such thing as a black hole, researchers said.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com//articleshow/43821528.cms
==…

 

[socratus]

Newton, Leibniz, Kant . . . were deists.
Is "Deism" dead ?
===